Advertisement

Local Criteria for Medicinal Plant Selection

  • Patrícia Muniz de MedeirosEmail author
  • Ana Haydée Ladio
  • Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
Chapter

Abstract

Some of the factors that influence the entrance of plants in a pharmacopoeia (inclusion) and the degree of importance of these plants to a human population (differential use) are described in this chapter. Certain variables, such as “chemical efficiency,” “cultural aspects,” and “organoleptic properties,” are highlighted. We show evidence that the concentration of certain compounds can determine a plant’s entrance and local importance. Recent studies have also shown that a plant’s taste and smell can influence its inclusion in local pharmacopoeias, so that taste and smell can be indicators of medicinal × non-medicinal species. We also show some studies that point out the role of taste and smell in influencing the therapeutic indications that are trated by a given species. We also discuss why some species are present in local medical systems even without chemical efficiency. The genetic and cultural nature of medicinal plant selection is also discussed.

Keywords

Evolutionary ethnobiology Human ecology Local ecological knowledge Plant resource use 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all members of the Laboratory of Theoretical and Applied Ethnobiology (LEA) for the important discussions that influenced this chapter. This work was supported by funding from the National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq—Proc. 471989/2012-6).

References

  1. Albuquerque UP (2006) Re-examining hypotheses concerning the use and knowledge of medicinal plants: a study in the Caatinga vegetation of NE Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM, Ramos MA, Ferreira-Júnior WS, Nascimento ALB, Torres-Avilez WM, Melo JG (2014) Are ethnopharmacological surveys useful for the discovery and development of drugs from medicinal plants? Rev Bras Farmacogn 24:110–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ankli A, Sticher O, Heinrich M (1999) Yucatec Maya medicinal plants versus non medicinal plants: indigenous characterization and selection. Hum Ecol 27:557–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Araújo TAS, Alencar NL, Amorim ELC, Albuquerque UP (2008) A new approach to study medicinal plants with tannins and flavonoids contents from the local knowledge. J Ethnopharmacol 120:72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett BC (2007) Doctrine of signatures: an explanation of medicinal plant discovery or dissemination of knowledge? Econ Bot 61:246–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brett JA, Heinrich M (1998) Culture, perception and the environment: the role of chemosensory perception. J Appl Bot Food Qual 72:67–69Google Scholar
  7. Casagrande DG (2000) Human taste and cognition in Tzeltal Maya medicinal plant use. J Ecol Anthropol 4:57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clayton DH, Wolfe ND (1993) The adaptative significance of self-medication. Trends Ecol Evol 8:60–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham AB (1993) African medicinal plants: setting priorities at the interface between conservation and primary healthcare. People and plants working paper 1. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. Dow J (1986) Universal aspects of symbolic healing: a theoretical synthesis. Am Anthropol 88:56–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Estomba D, Ladio A, Lozada M (2006) Medicinal wild plant knowledge and gathering patterns in a Mapuche community from North-western Patagonia. J Ethnopharmacol 103:109–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferreira Júnior WS, Cruz MP, Veira FJ, Albuquerque UP (2010) Are hallucinogenic plants efficacious in curing diseases? Bol Latinoam Caribe Plant Med 9:292–301Google Scholar
  13. Glendinning JI (1994) Is the bitter rejection response always adaptive? Physiol Behav 56:1217–1227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gobbo-Neto L, Lopes NP (2007) Plantas medicinais: fatores de influência no conteúdo de metabólitos secundários. Quim Nova 30:374–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Halberstein RA (2005) Medicinal plants: historical and cross-cultural usage patterns. Ann Epidemiol 15:686–699CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hart BL (2005) The evolution of herbal medicine: behavioural perspectives. Anim Behav 70:975–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heinrich M (2003) Ethnobotany and natural products: the search for new molecules, new treatments of old diseases or a better understanding of indigenous cultures? Curr Top Med Chem 3:141–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Heinrich M (2008) Ethnopharmacy and natural product research – multidisciplinary opportunities for research in the metabolomic age. Phytochem Lett 1:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khafagi IK, Dewedar A (2000) The efficiency of random versus ethno-directed research in the evaluation of Sinai medicinal plants for bioactive compounds. J Ethnopharmacol 71:365–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kleinman A (1978) Concepts and a model for the comparison of medical systems as cultural systems. Soc Sci Med 12:85–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Krief S, Hladik CM, Haxaire C (2005) Ethnomedicinal and bioactive properties of plants ingested by wild chimpanzees in Uganda. J Ethnopharmacol 101:1–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kurihara K, Katsuragi Y, Matsuoka I, Kashiwayanagi M, Kumazawa T, Shoji T (1994) Receptor mechanisms of bitter substances. Physiol Behav 56:1125–1132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Leonti M, Sticher O, Heinrich M (2002) Medicinal plants of the Popoluca, México: organoleptic properties as indigenous selection criteria. J Ethnopharmacol 81:307–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lumsden CJ, Wilson EO (1980) Translation of epigenetic rules of individual behavior into ethnographic patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77:4382–4386PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Medeiros PM, Pinto BLS, Nascimento VT (2015) Can organoleptic properties explain the differential use of medicinal plants? Evidence from Northeastern Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol 159:43–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Moerman DE, Jonas WB (2002) Deconstructing the placebo effect and finding the meaning response. Ann Intern Med 136:471–476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Molares S, Ladio A (2008) Plantas medicinales en una comunidad Mapuche del NO de la Patagonia Argentina: clasificación y percepciones organolépticas relacionadas con su valoración. Bol Latinoam Caribe Plant Med 7:149–155Google Scholar
  28. Molares S, Ladio A (2009) Chemosensory perception and medicinal plants for digestive ailments in a Mapuche community in NW Patagonia, Argentina. J Ethnopharmacol 123:397–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Molares S, Ladio A (2015) Medicinal plants in the cultural landscape of a Mapuche-Tehuelche community in arid Argentine Patagonia: an eco-sensorial approach. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 10:61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mollik AH, Hossan S, Paul AK, Taufiq-Ur-Rahman M, Jahan R, Rahmatullah M (2010) A comparative analysis of medicinal plants used by folk medicinal healers in three districts of Bangladesh and Inquiry as to mode of selection of medicinal plants. Ethnobot Res Appl 8:195–218Google Scholar
  31. Mutheeswaran S, Pandikumar P, Chellappandian M, Ignacimuthu S (2011) Documentation and quantitative analysis of the local knowledge on medicinal plants among traditional Siddha healers in Virudhunagar district of Tamil Nadu, India. J Ethnopharmacol 137:523–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Omar S, Lemmonier B, Jones N, Ficker C, Smith ML, Neema C, Towers GHN, Goel K, Arnason JT (2000) Antimicrobial activity of extracts of eastern North American hardwood trees and relation to traditional medicine. J Ethnopharmacol 73:161–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pinto EPP, Amorozo MCM, Furlan A (2006) Conhecimento popular sobre plantas medicinais em comunidades rurais de mata atlântica – Itacaré, BA, Brasil. Acta Bot Bras 20:751–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Quiroz D, van Andel T (2015) Evidence of a link between taboos and sacrifices and resource scarcity of ritual plants. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 11:5PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramos MA, Medeiros PM, Almeida ALS, Feliciano ALP, Albuquerque UP (2008a) Use and knowledge of fuelwood in na area of Caatinga vegetation in NE Brazil. Biomass Bioenerg 32:510–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ramos MA, Medeiros PM, Almeida ALS, Feliciano ALP, Albuquerque UP (2008b) Can wood quality justify local preferences for firewood in na area of caatinga (dryland) vegetation? Biomass Bioenerg 32:503–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reyes-Garcia V, Vadez V, Huanca T, Leonard W, Wilkie D (2005) Knowledge and consumption of wild plants: a comparative study in two Tsiname’ villages in the Bolivian Amazon. Ethnobot Res Appl 3:204–207Google Scholar
  38. Rodrigues E, Carlini EA (2006) A comparison of plants utilized in ritual healing by two Brazilian cultures: Quilombolas and Kraho Indians. J Psychoactive Drugs 38:285–295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sá e Silva IMM, Marangon LC, Hanazaki N, Albuquerque UP (2009) Use and knowledge of fuelwood in three rural caatinga (dryland) communities in NE Brazil. Environ Dev Sustain 11:833–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shephard GH Jr (2004) A sensory ecology of medicinal plant therapy in two amazonian societies. Am Anthropol 106:252–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Slish DF, Ueda H, Arvigo R, Balick MJ (1999) Ethnobotany in the search for vasoactive herbal medicines. J Ethnopharmacol 66:159–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilson EO (2012) The social conquest of earth. Liveright, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Winkelman M (2008) Cure and health: applying medical anthropology. Jossey-Bass, New York, NYGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrícia Muniz de Medeiros
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana Haydée Ladio
    • 2
  • Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
    • 3
  1. 1.Ethnobiology and Human Ecology Group, Center of Biological and Health SciencesUniversidade Federal do Oeste da BahiaMorada Nobre, BarreirasBrazil
  2. 2.Laboratorio Ecotono (Ecotono Laboratory), INIBIOMA—Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medio Ambiente (Biodiversity and Environmental Research Institute), CONICET-Universidad Nacional del Comahue (National University of Comahue)Centro Regional Universitario BarilocheQuintral, San Carlos de Bariloche-Río NegroArgentina
  3. 3.Laboratory of Applied and Theoretical Ethnobiology, Biology DepartmentUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoDois Irmãos, RecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations