Skip to main content

Maintenance System Performance, Productivity, and Continuous Improvement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 3349 Accesses

Abstract

Productivity and continues improvement of maintenance systems is the subject of this chapter. Continuous improvement of maintenance systems may be achieved using three approaches. The first approach is to use performance measures and the second approach is to conduct periodic auditing of the maintenance system. The third approach is to combine both approaches. In the first approach performance measures for the maintenance system are defined and computed on periodic basis. Targets are set and based on the system performance and the targets improvement programs are developed and implemented. In the second approach the regular audits are used to identify areas to improve the system. In this chapter a set of input, output and within the system measures together with the balanced scorecard are presented. Maintenance indices for administration, effectiveness, and cost followed by metric comparisons are provided. Then the chapter focuses on maintenance auditing and root causes analysis for developing corrective and preventive actions that is expected to result in continuous improvement. The chapter is concluded by a case study on maintenance, followed by benchmarking techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Campbell JD (1995) Uptime strategies for excellence in maintenance management. Productivity Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ishikawa K (1990) Guide to quality control. In: Quality resources. White Plains, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly A (1989) Maintenance and the management. Conference communication, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mann L (1983) Maintenance management, 2nd edn. Lexington Books, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moody P (1983) Decision making. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Niebel BW (1994) Engineering maintenance management, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas S, Vargas LG (1981) The logic of priorities. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  1. Duffuaa SO, Raouf A (1996) Continuous maintenance productivity improvement using structured audit. Int J Ind Eng Appl Pract 3(3):151–160

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duffuaa SO, Shuaib AN, Raouf A, Budair MO (1990) Evaluation of maintenance management systems. J King Saud University, vol 4 (Eng Sci) (Special issue on maintenance), pp 29–42

    Google Scholar 

  3. Westerkamp TA (1987) Using computer to audit maintenance productivity. In: Hartman (ed) Maintenance management. Institute of Industrial Engineering, Industrial Engineering and Management Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson PF, Dell H, Anderson GF (1993) Root cause analysis tool for total quality management. ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wireman T (1990) World class maintenance management. Industrial Press Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salih O. Duffuaa .

Exercises

Exercises

  1. 1.

    Define the term mean time between failures (MTBF) and suggest two ways of computing it.

  2. 2.

    A steel plant was scheduled to operate for 330 days last year. It had 8 unscheduled breakdowns that resulted in 240 h of downtime. The plant had 96 h of preventive maintenance during these 330 days. The plant was shutdown for 120 h due to lack of feed. Process was slow for 60 h at 80 % rate and wet feed slowed the process also for 48 h at 50 % rate.

    The production rate at 100 % capacity is 1000 tons per 24 h. In this period, 3000 tons was rejected and 5000 tons was classified as a second-quality product and sold at 50 % value.

    1. (a)

      Compute the plant availability , A.

    2. (b)

      Compute the process rate, PR.

    3. (c)

      Compute the quality rate, QR.

    4. (d)

      Compute overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) .

    5. (e)

      Compute the productivity capacity.

    In order to improve the productivity capacity which factor should management focus on and why?

  3. 3.

    List the factors that constitute the maintenance scheme .

  4. 4.

    List the most important three factors in the audit scheme. Justify your answer.

  5. 5.

    Use the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to estimate the weight of each factor listed in Question 1.

  6. 6.

    Why ABC analysis is needed in the continuous improvement program?

  7. 7.

    List possible corrective actions for the factor engineering and condition monitoring, if found deficient from the audit program.

  8. 8.

    Locate an organization nearby, conduct a detailed audit program, and use the approach suggested in the plan given in this chapter to suggest improvements.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duffuaa, S.O., Raouf, A. (2015). Maintenance System Performance, Productivity, and Continuous Improvement. In: Planning and Control of Maintenance Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19803-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19803-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19802-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19803-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics