Advertisement

Towards the Development of the Invention Coach: a Naturalistic Study of Teacher Guidance for an Exploratory Learning Task

  • Catherine C. Chase
  • Jenna MarksEmail author
  • Deena Bernett
  • Melissa Bradley
  • Vincent Aleven
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9112)

Abstract

We describe a study of naturalistic teacher guidance for an exploratory learning activity called Invention. Our study illustrates a specific pedagogical style, whereby the teacher offers little feedback and few explanations, but largely poses questions, to help students identify and remedy their own errors. These findings have informed the design of a computerized Invention Coach and may apply more broadly to other exploratory learning environments.

Keywords

Exploratory learning environments Intelligent learning environments Human tutoring Exploratory learning Intelligent tutors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schwartz, D.L., Martin, T.: Inventing to Prepare for Future Learning: The Hidden Efficiency of Encouraging Original Student Production in Statistics Instruction. Cognition and Instruction 22(2), 129–184 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwartz, D.L., Bransford, J.D.: A Time for Telling. Cognition and Instruction 16(4), 475–522 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwartz, D.L., Chase, C.C., Oppezzo, M.A., Chin, D.B.: Practicing Versus Inventing with Contrasting Cases: The Effects of Telling First on Learning and Transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology 103(4), 759 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shemwell, J.T., Chase, C.C., Schwartz, D.L.: Seeking the General Explanation: A Test of Inductive Activities for Learning and Transfer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52(1), 58–83 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chi, M.T., Siler, S.A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., Hausmann, R.G.: Learning from Human Tutoring. Cognitive Science 25(4), 471–533 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K., Magliano, J.P.: Collaborative Dialogue Patterns in Naturalistic One-to-one Tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9(6), 495–522 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McArthur, D., Stasz, C., Zmuidzinas, M.: Tutoring Techniques in Algebra. Cognition and Instruction 7(3), 197–244 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., Baggett, W.B.: Why Do Only Some Events Cause Learning During Human Tutoring? Cognition and Instruction 21(3), 209–249 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Collins, A., Stevens, A.L.: Goals and Strategies of Inquiry Teachers. Advances in instructional psychology 2, 65–119 (1982)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kapur, M.: Productive Failure. Cognition and Instruction 26(3), 379–424 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine C. Chase
    • 1
  • Jenna Marks
    • 1
    Email author
  • Deena Bernett
    • 1
  • Melissa Bradley
    • 1
  • Vincent Aleven
    • 2
  1. 1.Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Human-Computer Interaction InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations