Advertisement

MC-PSO/DE Hybrid with Repulsive Strategy – Initial Study

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9121)

Abstract

In this initial study it is described the possible hybridization of advanced Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) modification called MC-PSO and the Differential evolution (DE) algorithm. The advantage of hybridization of various evolutionary techniques is the shared benefit from various advantages of these methods. The motivation came from previous studies of the MC-PSO performance and behavior. The performance of the proposed method is tested on IEEE CEC 2013 benchmark set and compared with both PSO and DE.

Keywords

Particle swarm optimization PSO Differential evolution DE 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Grant Agency of the Czech Republic - GACR P103/15/06700S, further by financial support of research project NPU I No. MSMT-7778/2014 by the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic. Also by the European Regional Development Fund under the Project CEBIA-Tech No. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0089, partially supported by Grant of SGS No. SP2015/142 and SP2015/141, VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic and by Internal Grant Agency of Tomas Bata University under the project No. IGA/FAI/2015/057.

References

  1. 1.
    Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shi, Y., Eberhart, R.: A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence), pp. 69–73 I. S (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kennedy, J.: The particle swarm: social adaptation of knowledge. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 303–308 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nickabadi, A., Ebadzadeh, M.M., Safabakhsh, R.: A novel particle swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive inertia weight. Appl. Soft Comput. 11(4), 3658–3670 (2011). ISSN 1568-4946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Price, K.V.: An introduction to differential evolution. In: Corne, D., Dorigo, M., Glover, F. (eds.) New Ideas in Optimization, pp. 79–108. McGraw-Hill Ltd., Maidenhead (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Price, K.V., Storn, R.M., Lampinen, J.A.: Differential Evolution - A Practical Approach to Global Optimization. Natural Computing Series. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dorigo, M., Gambardella, L.M., Birattari, M., Martinoli, A., Poli, R., Stützle, T.: ANTS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4150. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zelinka, I.: SOMA — Self-Organizing Migrating Algorithm. New Optimization Techniques in Engineering. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 141, pp. 167–217. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pant, M., Thangaraj, R., Grosan, C., Abraham, A.: Hybrid differential evolution - Particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving global optimization problems. In: Third International Conference on Digital Information Management, ICDIM 2008, pp. 18-24 13–16 Nov 2008Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu, X., Cao, J., Shan, H., Zhu, L., Guo, J.: An adaptive hybrid algorithm based on particle swarm optimization and differential evolution for global optimization. The Scientific World Journal 2014, 16 (2014). doi: 10.1155/2014/215472. Article ID 215472Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pluhacek, M., Senkerik, R., Zelinka, I.: Multiple choice strategy – a novel approach for particle swarm optimization – preliminary study. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7895, pp. 36–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pluhacek, M., Senkerik, R., Zelinka, I.: Investigation on the performance of a new multiple choice strategy for PSO Algorithm in the task of large scale optimization problems. In: 2013 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 2007-2011 20–23 June 2013Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Riget, J., Vestterstrom, J.S.: A diversity-guided particle swarm optimizer - the ARPSO. Technical report, EVAlife, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, Denmark (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liang, J.J., Qu, B.-Y., Suganthan, P.N., Hernández-Díaz, A.G.: Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the cec 2013 special session and competition on real-parameter optimization. Technical Report 201212, Computational Intelligence Laboratory, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China and Technical Report, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Applied InformaticsTomas Bata University in ZlinZlinCzech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceTechnical University of OstravaOstrava, PorubaCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations