Advertisement

Creating the Pneumoperitoneum

  • Levent AvtanEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.4k Downloads

Abstract

This chapter focuses on starting the pneumoperitoneum and is a guide to prevention and management of access and exposure-related risk factors and complications; it also deals with pneumoperitoneum-associated alterations and complications. Main subtitles of this chapter are as below:
  • Access to Peritoneal Cavity and Exposure
    • Noninsufflated entry method
      • Trocar placement without prior pneumoperitoneum

      • Open method

    • Pre-insufflated entry method with Veress needle
      • Visual entry method (with or without pre-insufflation)

  • Access and Exposure-Related Risk Factors
    • Improper placement of Veress needle

    • Sudden uncontrolled entry into the peritoneal cavity

    • High-pressure reading

    • Poor visualisation

    • Risks related with port location

    • Uncontrolled entry

    • Removal of cannulas (Video 1.1)

  • Access and Exposure-Related Complications
    • Preperitoneal insufflation (Video 1.2)

    • Piercing the greater omentum with Veress needle

    • Puncture of a hollow organ with Veress needle

    • Complications of Potential Space Exposure

  • Complications of Trocar Placement
    • Abdominal wall haemorrhage

    • Major vascular injury

    • Bowel injury

    • Bladder injury

    • Trauma related with the type of port (Video 1.3)

  • Pneumoperitoneum-Associated Complications
    • Cardiopulmonary trouble

    • Gas embolisation

    • Deep vein thrombosis

    • Postoperative shoulder or subphrenic pain

  • Pneumoperitoneum-Associated Physiologic Alterations
    • Mechanical effects of increased intra-abdominal pressure

    • Direct systemic effects of absorbed CO2

  • Pneumoperitoneum and Abdominal Sepsis

Keywords

Veress Needle Peptic Ulcer Perforation Trocar Placement Carbon Dioxide Insufflation Major Vascular Injury 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

Video 1.1

Trocar site bleeding 90 s (MP4 106182 kb)

Video 1.2

Preperitoneal insufflation 54 s (MP4 61313 kb)

334927_1_En_1_MOESM3_ESM.mp4 (98.9 mb)
Video 1.3 Injury risk related with the type of port 60 s (thanks to Prof. Selman Uranüs for this video) (MP4 101247 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Lam A, Khong SY, Bignardi T (2010) Principles and strategies for dealing with complications in laparoscopy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 22:315–319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sesti F, Pietropolli A, Sesti FF, Piccione E (2013) Gasless laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy: evaluation of its role and usefulness. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 170:8–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li SH, Deng J, Huang FT, Gan XW, Cao YG (2014) Impact of gasless laparoscopy on circulation, respiration, stress response, other complications in gynecological geriatrics. Int J Clin Exp Med 15:2877–2882Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng Y, Lu J, Xiong X, Wu S, Lin Y, Wu T, Cheng N. Gases for establishing pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;31:1-CD009569Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gurusamy KS, Vaughan J, Davidson BR. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;18:3-CD006930Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Soper NJ, Scott-Corner CEH (eds) (2012) Basic laparoscopy and endoscopy. The SAGES Manual, 3rd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ulker K, Anuk T, Bozkurt M, Karasu Y (2014) Large bowel injuries during gynecological laparoscopy. World J Clin Cases 16:846–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Otsuka Y, Katagiri T, Ishii J, Maeda T, Kubota Y, Tamura A, Tsuchiya M, Kaneko H (2013) Gas embolism in laparoscopic hepatectomy: what is the optimal pneumoperitoneal pressure for laparoscopic major hepatectomy? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:137–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kashtan J, Green JF, Parsons EQ, Holcroft JW (1981) Hemodynamic effects of increased abdominal pressure. J Surg Res 30:249–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Motew M, Ivankovich AD, Bieniarz J, Albrecht RF, Zahed B, Sommegna A (1973) Cardiovascular effects, acid–base and blood gas changes during laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 115:1002–1012PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fox LG, Hein H, Gawey B (1993) Physiologic alterations during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology 79:A55 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Safran D, Sganbti S, Orlando R (1993) Laparoscopy in high risk cardiac patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176:548–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knolmayr TJ, Bowyer MW, Egan JC, Asburn HJ (1998) The effect of pneumoperitoneum on gastric blood flow and traditional hemodynamic measurements. Surg Endosc 12:115–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ho HS, Gunther RA, Wolfe BM (1992) Intraperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation and cardiopulmonary functions. Arch Surg 127:928–932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marshall RL, Jebson PJR, Davie IT, Scott DB (1972) Circulatory effects of carbon dioxide insufflation of the peritoneal cavity for laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 44:680–684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bloechle C, Kluth D, Holstein AF, Emmermann A, Strate T, Zornig C, Izbicki JR (1999) A pneumoperitoneum perpetuates severe damage of the ultrastructural integrity of parietal peritoneum in gastric perforation and induced peritonitis in rats. Surg Endosc 13:683–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mouret P, Francois Y, Vignal J, Barth X, Lombard-Platet R (1990) Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 77:1006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Safran D, Orlando R (1994) Physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum. Am Surg 167:281–286Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Okeson GC, Symmonds RE, Synder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW (1991) Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of postoperative pulmonary function. Ann Surg 213:651–653PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Evasovich MR, Clark TC, Horattas MC, Holda S, Treen L (1996) Does pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy increase bacterial translocation? Surg Endosc 10:1176–1179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gurtner GC, Robertson CS, Chung SC, Ling TK, lp SM, Li AK (1995) Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on bacteraemia and endotoxaemia in an animal model of peritonitis. Br J Surg 82:844–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsilibary EC, Wissig SL (1983) Lymphatic absorption from the peritoneal cavity: regulation of patency of mesothelial stomata. Microvasc Res 25:22–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leak LV, Rahil K (1978) Permeability of the diaphragmatic mesothelium: the ultra-structural basis for “stomata”. Am J Anat 151:557–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brokelman WJ, Lensvelt M, Borel Rinkes IH, Klinkenbijl JH, Reijnen MM (2011) Peritoneal changes due to laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 25:1–9PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sammour T, Mittal A, Loveday BP, Kahokehr A, Phillips AR, Windsor JA, Hill AG (2009) Systematic review of oxidative stress associated with pneumoperitoneum. Br J Surg 96:836–850CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Istanbul School of Medicineİstanbul University Continuing Medical Education and Research Centre, Turkish National Association for Endoscopic Laparoscopic SurgeryIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations