Advertisement

A Conceptual Approach for Relational IR: Application to Legal Collections

  • Nada Mimouni
  • Adeline Nazarenko
  • Sylvie Salotti
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9113)

Abstract

Everyone who works in the legal field is faced with the complexity of documentary sources of law, that are highly interrelated and interdependent of each others. It is essential for legal practitioners to rely on systems that retrieve all the sources related to the legal cases they are working on and not only the most relevant ones. The challenge for legal IR is to achieve exhaustivity and handle this complexity by retrieving documents on the basis of the semantic content and the intertextual relationships. This work proposes an IR approach for legal sources that goes beyond existing systems. It is based on Formal and Relational Concept Analysis to structure, query and browse collections of legal documents.

Keywords

Legal information retrieval Intertextuality Relational queries Exploration Formal concept analysis Relational concept analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially funded by the Légilocal project (French Single Inter-Ministry Fund, FUI-9, 2010–2013) and is supported by Labex EFL (French National Research Agency, ANR-10-LABX-0083).

References

  1. 1.
    Azmeh, Z., Rouane, M-H., Huchard, M., Napoli, A., Valtchev, P.: Querying relational concept lattices. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Concept Lattices and their Applications (CLA 2011), Nancy, France, pp. 377–392, October 2011Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bourcier, D.: Sciences juridiques et complexitë. Un nouveau modéle d’analyse. Droit et Cultures 61(1), 37–53 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brin, S., Page, L.: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW7), pp. 107–117 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carpineto, C., Romano, G.: Using concept lattices for text retrieval and mining. In: Ganter, B., Stumme, G., Wille, R. (eds.) Formal Concept Analysis. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3626, pp. 161–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Codocedo, V., Lykourentzou, I., Napoli, A.: A semantic approach to concept lattice-based information retrieval. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 72(1–2), 169–195 (2014)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferré, S.: Camelis: a logical information system to organise and browse a collection of documents. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 38(4), 379–403 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fowler, J.H., Johnson, T.R., Spriggs, J.F., Jeon, S., Wahlbeck, P.J.: Network analysis and the law: measuring the legal importance of precedents at the u.s. supreme court. Polit. Anal. 15, 324–346 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ganter, B., Stumme, G., Wille, R. (eds.): Formal Concept Analysis, Foundations and Applications. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3626. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Godin, R., Missaoui, R., Alaoui, H.: Incremental concept formation algorithms based on galois (concept) lattices. Comput. Intell. 11, 246–267 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huchard, M., Hacene, M.R., Roume, C., Valtchev, P.: Relational concept discovery in structured datasets. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 49, 39–76 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kotters, J.: Object configuration browsing in relational databases. In: Jäschke, R. (ed.) ICFCA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6628, pp. 151–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Messai, N., Devignes, M.-D., Napoli, A., Smaïl-Tabbone, M.: Querying a bioinformatic data sources registry with concept lattices. In: Dau, F., Mugnier, M.-L., Stumme, G. (eds.) ICCS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3596, pp. 323–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mimouni, N., Fernàndez, M., Nazarenko, A., Bourcier, D., Salotti, S.: A relational approach for information retrieval on XML legal sources. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, (ICAIL), Rome, Italy, pp. 212–216 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation. Electron. Trans. Artif. Intell. 4(C), 21–33 (2000)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Romain, B., Mazzega, P., Bourcier, D.: A network approach to the french system of legal codes- part i: analysis of a dense network. J. Artif. Intell. Law 19, 333–355 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rouane, M.H., Huchard, M., Napoli, A., Valtchev, P.: Relational concept analysis: mining concept lattices from multi-relational data. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 67(1), 81–108 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Valtchev, P., Grosser, D., Roume, C., Hacene, M.R.: Galicia: an open platform for lattices. In: Using Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2003), pp. 241–254. Shaker Verlag (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Winkels, R., de Ruyter, J.: Survival of the fittest: network analysis of dutch supreme court cases. In: Palmirani, M., Pagallo, U., Casanovas, P., Sartor, G. (eds.) AICOL-III 2011. LNCS, vol. 7639, pp. 106–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wray, T., Eklund, P.W.: Exploring the information space of cultural collections using formal concept analysis. In: Jäschke, R. (ed.) ICFCA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6628, pp. 251–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nada Mimouni
    • 1
  • Adeline Nazarenko
    • 1
  • Sylvie Salotti
    • 1
  1. 1.LIPN (UMR 7030)Université Paris 13 - Sorbonne Paris Cité and CNRSVilletaneuseFrance

Personalised recommendations