Skip to main content

Adequacy of Soil Information Resulting from Geopedology-Based Predictive Soil Mapping for Assessing Land Degradation: Case Studies in Thailand

  • Chapter
Geopedology

Abstract

Soil is a natural body which delivers important ecosystem services apart from being a medium for plant growth. Soil mapping can be time consuming and expensive. During the 1960s and 1970s, introduction of air photo-interpretation in soil survey through element analysis, physiognomic and physiographic analysis, helped increase mapping efficiency. In the late 1980s, the geopedologic approach to soil mapping amplified the role of geomorphology. It helps understand soil variation in the landscape which increases mapping efficiency. In the present study, the adequacy of soil data resulting from geopedology-based predictive soil mapping for assessing land degradation in three locations in Thailand is assessed. The result shows that the geopedologic approach helps map soil in inaccessible mountain areas. However, for application in land degradation studies all the required soil properties may not be available in a soil map. The effect of land cover and land use management practices on soil properties, such as porosity and compaction having effect on hydraulic conductivity, a parameter used in modelling rainfall-runoff-soil erosion, is usually not reported in soil survey. These data have to be collected separately. For mapping areas susceptible to frequent flood, the geomorphic understanding of the river valley and soil characterization (Fluventic and Aquic) help identify susceptible areas. Similarly, the study shows how the geopedologic approach in combination with digital image processing helps in mapping soil salinity hazard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Behrens T, Förster H, Scholten T, Steinrücken U, Spies ED, Goldschmitt M (2005) Digital soil mapping using artificial neural networks. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 168(1):21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennema J, Gelens HF (1969) Aerial photo-interpretation for soil surveys, ITC lecture notes. ITC, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  • Buringh P (1960) The application of aerial photographs in soil surveys. In: Colwell RN (ed) Manual of photographic interpretation. American Society of Photogrammetry, Washington, DC, pp 633–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesworth W (ed) (2008) Encyclopedia of soil science. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Esfandiarpoor BI, Mohammadi J, Salehi MH, Toomanian N, Poch RM (2010) Assessing geopedological soil mapping approach by statistical and geostatistical methods: a case study in the Borujen region, Central Iran. Catena 82(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1998) World reference base for soil resources. World soil resources report 84, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Farshad A, Shrestha DP, Moonjun R (2013) Do the emerging methods of digital soil mapping have anything to learn from the geopedologic approach to soil mapping and vice verse? In: Shahid SA, Taha FK, Abdelfattah MA (eds) Developments in soil classification, land use planning and policy implications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 109–131

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frost RE (1960) Photo interpretation of soils. In: Colwell RN (ed) Manual of photographic interpretation. American Society of Photogrammetry, Washington, DC, pp 343–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Goosen D (1967) Aerial photo interpretation in soil survey. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Soils bulletin 6. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm R, Behrens T, Marker M, Elsenbeer H (2008) Soil organic carbon concentrations and stocks on Barro Colorado Island: digital soil mapping using random forests analysis. Geoderma 146:102–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansakdi E (1998) Soil pattern analysis and the effect of soil variability on land use in the upper Pa Sak area, Petchabun, Thailand. Unpublished MSc thesis, ITC, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  • Imaizumi K, Sukchan S, Wichaidit P. Srisuk K, Kaneko F (2002) Hydrological and geochemical behavior of saline groundwater in Phra Yun, Khon Kaen, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagacherie P (2008) Digital soil mapping: a state of the art. In: Hartemink AE, McBratney A, Mendonca-Santos ML (eds) A state of the art: digital soil mapping with limited data. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lagacherie P, McBratney AB, Voltz M (eds) (2007) Digital soil mapping: an introductory perspective. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • McBratney AB, Odeh IOA, Bishop TFA, Dunbar MS, Shatar TM (2000) An overview of pedometric techniques for use in soil survey. Geoderma 97(3–4):293–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC (2001) A simple approach to soil loss prediction: a revised Morgan-Morgan-Finney model. Catena 44:305–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine D, Kiser J (2012) Aerial photography and image interpretation, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha DP, Farshad A (2008) Mapping salinity hazard: an integrated application of remote sensing and modeling-based techniques. In: Metternicht G, Zinck JA (eds) Remote sensing of soil salinization: impact on land management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 257–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha DP, Soliman AS, Farshad A, Yadav RD (2005) Salinity mapping using geopedologic and soil line approach. Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha DP, Suriyaprasit M, Prachansri S (2014) Assessing soil erosion in inaccessible mountainous areas in the tropics: the use of land cover and topographic parameters in a case study in Thailand. Catena 121:40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for mapping and interpreting soil surveys. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Soliman AS (2004) Detecting salinity in early stages using electromagnetic survey and multivariate geostatistical techniques: a case study of Nong Sung district, Nakhon Ratchasima province, Thailand. Unpublished MSc thesis, ITC, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon H (2005) GIS-based surface runoff modeling and analysis of contributing factors: a case study of the Nam Chun Watershed, Thailand. Unpublished MSc thesis, ITC, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinck JA (1989) Physiography and soils, ITC lecture notes. ITC, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Materials used in the case studies were derived from a joint research project of ITC, Enschede, the Netherlands, with the Land Development Department (LDD), Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok, Thailand. Contribution of ITC course participants, especially Anukul Suchinai, Ekanit Hansakdi, Harssema Solomon, and Aiman Soliman, is duly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. P. Shrestha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shrestha, D.P., Moonjun, R., Farshad, A., Udomsri, S. (2016). Adequacy of Soil Information Resulting from Geopedology-Based Predictive Soil Mapping for Assessing Land Degradation: Case Studies in Thailand. In: Zinck, J.A., Metternicht, G., Bocco, G., Del Valle, H.F. (eds) Geopedology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19159-1_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics