Advertisement

Autonomic Transport Management Systems—Enabler for Smart Cities, Personalized Medicine, Participation and Industry Grid/Industry 4.0

  • Jörn Schlingensiepen
  • Florin Nemtanu
  • Rashid Mehmood
  • Lee McCluskey
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 32)

Abstract

Today’s societies are facing great challenges in transforming living environments in a way better serving people’s demands of the future. A key point in this transformation is reinventing cities as smart cities, where the core services are integrated in a way that ensures a high quality of life while minimizing the usage of resources [Smart cities in Europe. Serie Research Memoranda 0048, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics 1]. Setting up smart cities resp. transforming cities to smart cities includes the development of smart transport systems as a main service all other services rely on. Thinking about current mega trends like Individualization of Products (Mass Customization) in so called Industry grid also known as Industry 4.0 [Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0 2] (Industrie 4.0 describes the industry in the 4th industrial revolution to customized mass production after mechanization, mass production, digitalization [Map ‘n’ tag. Thinking highways 3]), Personalized Medicine or the need of better support for disabled and older people in an aging society, the interconnection of involved bodies is a premise. In virtual world this means integration of data networks and ICTs in the physical world this means establishing individual and personalized transport services that cover individual mobility and individual distribution of goods. To ensure the best utilization of infrastructure while having less employable people in an aging society a high grade of automation and information integration is needed. We call this a smart transport system as the next step in development of today’s intelligent transport systems (ITS) and propose establishing this ITS of the future as an autonomic system to meet all the different requirements and ensure a high reliability of the overall system. Reliability is essential since most other services of the living environment smart city, will rely on transport systems. This chapter gives an overview on state of research based on current literature and recent publications of the authors (see references) and focus on the ICT system needed to manage transportation the autonomic transport management system.

Keywords

Personalized mobility Logistics for industry grid/industry 4.0 Smart cities Individual/personalized transport Personalized medicine Individual products/mass customization Networked information systems Sensors as a service autonomic computing Participation of disabled 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors are members of COST ARTS founded by EU commission (www.cost-arts.org).

References

  1. 1.
    Caragliu A, Del Bo C, Nijkamp P (2009) Smart cities in Europe. Serie Research Memoranda 0048, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics. http://ideas.repec.org/p/dgr/vuarem/2009-48.html
  2. 2.
    Kagermann H, Wahlster W, Helbig J (2013) Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0 - Abschlussbericht des Arbeitskreises Industrie 4.0. Tech. rep., acatech - Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften e. V., Hofgartenstrasse 2, 80539 MünchenGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koesling S (2014) Map ‘n’ tag. Thinking highways 9(1)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Commission (2007) Green paper. Towards a new culture for urban mobility, Sept 2007, p 24Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    European Commission (2010) Communication from The Commission—Europe 2020—a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    United Nations Conference on Road Traffic (1969) United Nations Conference on Road Traffic, Vienna, 7. Final act, convention on road traffic, convention on road signs and signals, 8 Oct 1968. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Accenture (2011) Building and managing an intelligent city. Tech. rep. http://www.accenture.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/PDF/Accenture-Building-Managing-Intelligent-City.pdf
  8. 8.
    European Commission (2006) Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament on thematic strategy on the urban environment. Tech. rep., European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/urban/pdf/com_2005_0718_en.pdf
  9. 9.
    PublicPolicyEx (2014, Apr) Smart cities, smart Europe. www.publicpolicyexchange.co.uk
  10. 10.
    My Way Project Team (2014) Multi-modal journey planning made easy to encourage the use of sustainable modes of transport. http://www.myway-project.eu/
  11. 11.
    Heng S (2014, Apr) Industry 4.0—upgrading of Germany’s industrial capabilities on the horizon. Current issues—sector research, Deutsche Bank Research, Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Research, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smart Manufacturing Leadership Coalition (2014) Web page. Smart manufacturing leadership coalition, Los Angeles, USA. https://smartmanufacturingcoalition.org/
  13. 13.
    German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (2014) Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0. web site, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    MyMuesli (2014) My müsli - dein persönliches Lieblingsmüsli. web site, mymuesli GmbH, Sailerwöhr 16, D-94032 PassauGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flyfact (2014) Industrie 4.0 - Grundlagenwissen, Expertenwissen und Pioniere. Tech. rep., Flyfacts GmbH, Jena, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hartbrich I (2014) Industrie 4.0 - in der Zukunftsfabrik. Die Zeit 5 (01 2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Personalized Medicine Coalition (2011, Sept) The case for personalized medicine, 3rd edn. Technical report, 1225 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 450, Washington, DC 20005Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U. S. Food and Drug Administration (2013) Paving the way for personalized medicine—FDA’s role in a new era of medical product development. Technical report 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Apple Inc. (2014) Apple health in IOS 8. web site, 1 Infinite Loop Cupertino, CA 95014. https://www.apple.com/ios/whats-new/health/
  20. 20.
    Microsoft Corporation (2014) Healthvault. One Microsoft Way, Redmond, Washington 98052 USA. https://www.healthvault.com
  21. 21.
    Samsung Electronics Co. (2014) Samsung s health. Maetandong 416 Suwon, Gyeonggi-do Samsung Medison Bldg., 42, Teheran-ro 108 gil. http://contentsamsung.com/us/contents/aboutn/sHealthIntro.do
  22. 22.
    Schlingensiepen J, Naroska E, Stockmanns G, Christen O, Bolten T (2014) Using overlay descriptions to utilize personalized travel planning in public transport. In: Nemtanu F, Vasile I, Lopez VRT (eds) Proceedings of the 15th ITS Romania Congress 2014. ITS RomaniaGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fluidtime Data Services GmbH (2014) Trafficcheck - Verkehrsteilnehmerinnen können den Verkehr regeln. web site, Neubaugasse 12-14/25, A-1070 WienGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mobile Team, Hochschule Niederrhein (2014) Forschungsprojekt mobile—mobil im leben. http://www.hs-niederrhein.de/mobile/
  25. 25.
    United Nations (2006) Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schlingensiepen J, Mehmood R, Nemtanu R, Niculescu M (2014) Increasing sustainability of road transport in European cities and metropolitan areas by facilitating autonomic road transport systems (ARTS). In: Proceedings on sustainable automotive technologies 2013, pp 201–210. Springer International Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01884-3
  27. 27.
    The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2010) Directive 2010/40/eu of the European parliament and of the council of 7 July 2010 on the framework for the deployment of intelligent transport systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other modes of transport. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32010L0040
  28. 28.
    TUD COST ACTION TU1102 (2013) Autonomic road transport systems (ARTS). http://helios.hud.ac.uk/cost/
  29. 29.
    Group, U.I.E. (2013) Guidelines for its deployment in urban areas—multimodal information. Technical report. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/its/road/action/plan/doc/2013-urban-its-expert group-guidelines-on-multimodal-information.pdf
  30. 30.
    Wang P, Hunter T, Bayen AM, Schechtner K, Gonzalez MC (2012) Understanding road usage patterns in urban areas. Scientific Reports 2(1001) (12 2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep01001,  10.1038/srep01001
  31. 31.
    Ricardo UK Ltd (2014) The SARTRE project. http://www.sartreproject.eu/en/Sidor/default.aspx
  32. 32.
    Davila A, Aramburu E, Freixas A (2013) Making the best out of aerodynamics: platoons. Technical Paper 2013–01-0767, SAE, Detroit, USA. http://papers.sae.org/2013-01-0767/
  33. 33.
    Chan E, Gilhead P, Jelinek P, Krejci P, Robinson T (2012) Cooperative control of SARTRE automated platoon vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 19th ITS World Congress, Vienna. http://www.sartre-project.eu/en/publications/Documents/ITSWC 2012 control.pdf
  34. 34.
    Risto M, van Berkum E (2013, May) Connected cruise control (CCC). Technical report. http://www.utwente.nl/ctw/vvr/projects/projects/Connected%20Cruise%20 Control%2028CCC%29/
  35. 35.
    Kephart J, Chess D (2003) The vision of autonomic computing. Computer 36(1):41–50MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Balbo F, Pinson S (2010) Using intelligent agents for transportation regulation support system design. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 18(1):140–156. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X09000539
  37. 37.
    Dusparic I, Cahill V (2009) Distributed W-learning: multi-policy optimization in selforganizing systems. In: Proceedings of the third IEEE international conference on self-adaptive and self-organizing systems, SASO 2009, pp 20–29Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bazzan AL (2005) A distributed approach for coordination of traffic signal agents. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 10(1):131–164. doi: 10.1007/s10458-004-6975-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bhouri N, Balbo F, Pinson S (2010) A multi-agent system to regulate bimodal urban traffic. In: Proceedings of the European workshop on multi-agent systems, EUMAS 2010. Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    McCluskey T, West M (2001) The automated refinement of a requirements domain theory. Autom Softw Eng 8(2):195–218MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Branke J, Mnif M, Muller-Schloer C, Prothmann H (2006, Nov) Organic computing—addressing complexity by controlled self-organization. In: Proceedings of second international symposium on leveraging applications of formal methods, verification and validation, ISoLA 2006, pp 185–191Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Prothmann H, Branke J, Schmeck H, Tomforde S, Rochner F, Hahner J, Muller-Schloer C (2009) Organic traffic light control for urban road networks. Int J Auton Adapt Commun Syst 2(3):203–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (2011) Förderrichtlinie “von Tür zu Tür” eine mobilitätsinitiative für den Öffentlichen Personenverkehr der Zukunft. Tech. rep, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und TechnologieGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    United Nations (2014) Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Technical report. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mobil im Leben (2014) Projektseite. http://mobil-im-leben.org/
  46. 46.
    Nemtanu FC, Moise IM, Beldescu MG, Iordache V (2013) Model of cloudified traveller information system based on petri nets. In: Peoceedings of the 36th international spring seminar on electronics technology—automotive electronicsGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    VRR (2014) VRR - Zahlen und Daten. http://www.vrr.de/de/vrr/verbund/zahlen/
  48. 48.
    Stockmanns G, Koch F (2014) Gut versorgt bedeutet Lebensqualität für alle: Innovative Ansätze zur Versorgung von Menschen mit Einschränkungen. In: REHACare Congress 2014Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Linde H, Naroska E, Stromberg G (2005) Low cost resolution enhancement in hyperbolic localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE joint 2nd workshop on positioning, navigation and communication (WPNC) and 1st ultra-wideband expert talk (UET), Hannover, Germany, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Linde H, Naroska E, Stromberg G, Sturm T (2004) TDOA localization of unsynchronized nodes. In: Proceedings of the 13th IST mobile and wireless communications summit 2004Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ressel C, Ziegler J, Naroska E (2006) An approach towards personalized user interfaces for ambient intelligent home environments. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IET international conference on intelligent environments, IE 06. vol 1, pp 247–255Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ressel C (2008) Modellbasierte Generierung von personalisierten und adaptiven Benutzungsschnittstellen für integrierte Wohnumgebungen. Schriften zu Kooperations und Mediensystemen, Eul, Lohmar [u.a.], 1. au. ednGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Costa C, Almeida J (2007) Reputation systems for fighting pollution in peer-to-peer file sharing systems. In: Proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on peer-to-peer computing, 2007. P2P 2007, pp 53–60Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Costa J (2014) Personas putting the focus back on the user. Des ResGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mocofan A, Ghita R, Lopez V, Nemtanu F (2014) Comparative assessment of traffic control parameters within an UTC-distributed system. J Transp Eng 140(3):05013003. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    PTV Group (2014) Traffic simulation product web site, Haid-und-Neu-Straße 15, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany. http://vision-traffic.ptvgroup.com/en-us/home/
  57. 57.
    Caliper Corporation(2014) TransCAD transportation planning software product web site, 1172 Beacon Street, Suite 300, Newton, MA 02461, USA. http://www.caliper.com/tcovu.htm
  58. 58.
    City Labs (2014) Cube product web site, 1009 Oak Hill Road, Suite 201 Lafayette, CA 94549 USA. http://citilabs.com/software/
  59. 59.
    TSS-Transport Simulation Systems, S.L. (2014) Aimsun prodct web site, Passeig de Gràcia 12, 08007 Barcelona, Spain, http://www.aimsun.com/wp/
  60. 60.
    McNally MG (2007) The four step model, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California. http://www.its.uci.edu/its/publications/papers/CASA/UCI-ITS-AS-WP-07-2.pdf
  61. 61.
    Nemtanu FC, Minea M (2007) New components of ITS functional architecture: mobility management and safety and security functional area. In: European ITS Congress, Aalborg, Denmark, 18–20 June 2007, paper no 2393Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Nemtanu FC, Moise IM, Banica CK (2013) Hybrid simulation in intelligent transportation systems. In: Proceedings 36th international spring seminar on electronics technology—automotive electronicsGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Jensen CT (2014, Apr) SOA design principles for dummies, provided by service oriented architecture (SOA): simply good design. Technical report, IBM. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/solutions/soa/
  64. 64.
    Laird R (2013) IBM white paper—key entry points for implementing service oriented architecture (SOA)—October 2013 provided by service oriented architecture (SOA): simply good design. Technical report, IBMGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Schlingensiepen J, Mehmood R, Nemtanu F (2014) Using corporative ICT architecture building a framework for an autonomic transport system in smart cities. Inf Technol Control (accepted Paper)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Schlingensiepen J (2008) Korporative IT-Systemarchitektur zur Unterstuetzung unternehmensuebergreifender kooperativer Produktentwicklung. Integrierte Produktentwicklung, Teil Bd. 14, Otto-von-Guericke-Univ., Lehrstuhl fuer Maschinenbauinformatik, MagdeburgGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Liang J, Kumar R, Xi Y, Ross K (2005) Pollution in P2P file sharing systems. In: INFOCOM 2005. 24th annual joint conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, vol 2. Proceedings IEEE, pp 1174–1185Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rowaihy H, Enck W, McDaniel P, Porta TL (2005) Limiting sybil attacks in structured peer-to-peer networks. Technical report. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State CollegeGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Weißer D, Franke T, Bandelin H, Radermacher B, Wehrmann A, Meier-Leu W (2014) Internetprotokoll basiertes integriertes Bordinformationssystem IBIS-IP. No. 301-1 in VDV-SchriftGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörn Schlingensiepen
    • 1
  • Florin Nemtanu
    • 2
  • Rashid Mehmood
    • 3
  • Lee McCluskey
    • 4
  1. 1.TH IngolstadtIngolstadtGermany
  2. 2.“POLITEHNICA” University of BucharestBucharestRomania
  3. 3.King Khalid UniversityAbhaSaudi Arabia
  4. 4.University of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK

Personalised recommendations