Advertisement

Freeway Traffic Management in Presence of Vehicle Automation and Communication Systems (VACS)

  • Markos PapageorgiouEmail author
  • Christina Diakaki
  • Ioannis Nikolos
  • Ioannis Ntousakis
  • Ioannis Papamichail
  • Claudio Roncoli
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mobility book series (LNMOB)

Abstract

During the last decade, there has been a significant effort to develop a variety of Vehicle Automation and Communication Systems (VACS). These are expected to revolutionise the features and capabilities of individual vehicles within the next decades. The introduction of VACS brings along the (sometimes ignored) necessity and continuously growing opportunities for accordingly adapted or utterly new Traffic Management (TM) actions and strategies. This calls for a new era of freeway TM research and practice, which is indispensable in order to accompany, complement and exploit the evolving VACS deployment. Specifically, the development of new traffic flow modelling and control approaches should become a priority in the years to come.

Keywords

Traffic management Traffic control Traffic flow modelling Vehicle automation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has been conducted in the frame of the project TRAMAN21, which has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007–2013)/ERC Advanced Grant Agreement no. 321132.

References

  1. 1.
    Papageorgiou M, Diakaki C, Dinopoulou V, Kotsialos A, Wang Y (2003) Review of road traffic control strategies. Proc IEEE 91:2043–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diakaki C, Papageorgiou M, Papamichail I, Nikolos I, Iordanidou G-R, Porfyri K (2014) Overview and analysis of vehicle automation and communication systems from a motorway traffic management perspective, deliverable 1 of the ERC (European Research Council) Advanced Investigator Grant project TRAMAN21 (FP7-ERC Grant Agreement no. 321132), Chania, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    SMART EC Project (2011) Definition of necessary vehicle and infrastructure systems for automated driving—final reportGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    HAVEit EC Project (2011) The future of driving—final reportGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Viti F, Hoogendoorn SP, Alkim TP, Bootsma G (2008) Driving behavior adaptation under ACC: results from a large field operational test in The Netherlands. In: Preprints of the intelligent vehicle symposium. Eindhoven, The Netherlands, pp 745–750Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benmimoun M, Pütz A, Zlocki A, Eckstein L (2013) Impact assessment of adaptive cruise control (ACC) and forward collision warning (FCW) within a field operational test in Europe. In: Preprints of the 92nd annual meeting of the transportation research board. Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Toulminet G, Boussuge J, Laurgeau C (2010) Interoperable cooperative traffic management services demonstrated on the French site of the European project COOPERS. In: Proceedings of 13th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems. Madeira, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Popescu-Zeletin R, Radusch I, Rigani MA (2010) Vehicular-2-X communication: state-of-the-art and research in mobile vehicular ad hoc networks. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bergenhem C, Hedin E, Skarin D (2012) Vehicle-to-vehicle communication for a platooning system. Procedia Social Behav Sci 48:1222–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horowitz R, Varaiya P (2000) Control design of an automated highway system. Proc IEEE 88:913–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dragutinovic N, Brookhuis KA, Hagenzieker MP, Marchau VAWJ (2005) Behavioural effects of advanced cruise control use—a meta-analytic approach. Eur J Transport Infrastruct Res 5:267–280Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kesting A, Treiber M, Schoenhof M, Helbing D (2008) Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance. Transp Res Part C 16:668–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davis LC (2004) Effect of adaptive cruise control systems on traffic flow. Phys Rev E 69:066110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Arem B, Van Driel CJG, Visser R (2006) The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 7:429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kesting A, Treiber M, Schönhof M, Helbing D (2007) Extending adaptive cruise control to adaptive driving strategies. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2000:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ntousakis IA, Porfyri K, Nikolos IK, Papageorgiou M (2014) Assessing the impact of a cooperative merging system on highway traffic using a microscopic flow simulator. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 international mechanical engineering conference and exposition (IMECE2014). Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 14–20 Nov 2014. Paper no. IMECE2014-39850Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ntousakis IA, Nikolos IK, Papageorgiou M (2014) On microscopic modelling of adaptive cruise control systems. In: 4th international symposium of transport simulation 2014 (ISTS 2014), Corsica, France, 1–4 June 2014Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Helbing D (2001) Traffic and related many-particle systems. Rev Mod Phys 73:1067–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Helbing D (2009) Derivation of non-local macroscopic traffic equations and consistent traffic pressures from microscopic car-following models. Eur Phys J 69:539–548MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Delis AI, Nikolos IK, Papageorgiou M (2014) High-resolution numerical relaxation approximations to second-order macroscopic traffic flow models. Transp Res Part C 44:318–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ioannou PA, Sun J (1996) Robust adaptive control. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karafyllis I, Jiang Z-P (2011) Stability and stabilization of nonlinear systems. Springer, BerlinzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Allgöwer F, Zheng A (eds) (2000) Nonlinear model predictive control. BirkhäuserGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roncoli C, Papamichail I, Papageorgiou M (2014) Model predictive control for multi-lane motorways in presence of VACS. In: Proceedings of the 17th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC 2014). Qingdao, China, pp 501–507Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markos Papageorgiou
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christina Diakaki
    • 1
  • Ioannis Nikolos
    • 1
  • Ioannis Ntousakis
    • 1
  • Ioannis Papamichail
    • 1
  • Claudio Roncoli
    • 1
  1. 1.Dynamic Systems and Simulation LaboratoryTechnical University of CreteChaniaGreece

Personalised recommendations