Advertisement

Empowering End-Users to Collaboratively Structure Processes for Knowledge Work

  • Matheus Hauder
  • Rick Kazman
  • Florian Matthes
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 208)

Abstract

Knowledge work is becoming the predominant type of work in many countries and is involved in the most important processes in organizations. Despite its increasing importance business information systems still lack appropriate support for knowledge-intensive processes, since existing workflow management solutions are too rigid and provide no means to deal with unpredictable situations. Future business information systems that attempt to improve this support need to solve the problem of facilitating non-expert users to structure their processes. The recently published Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN) might overwhelm non-expert users. Our research hypotheses is that end-users can be empowered to structure processes for knowledge work. In an evaluation with two student teams working on a software development project our solution improved the information structure, reproducibility, progress visualization, work allocation and guidance without losing the flexibility compared to a leading agile project management tool.

Keywords

Knowledge-intensive processes CMMN Adaptive processes Adaptive case management Business information systems 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research has been sponsored in part by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) with grant number TUM: 01IS12057.

References

  1. 1.
    Brynjolfsson, E., McAfee, A.: Race against the Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. Digital Frontier Press, Lexington (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davenport, T.H.: Thinking for a living: how to get better performances and results from knowledge workers. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van der Aalst, W., Stoffele, M., Wamelink, J.: Case handling in construction. Autom. Constr. 12(3), 303–320 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strong, D.M., Miller, S.M.: Exceptions and exception handling in computerized information processes. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 13(2), 206–233 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Ciccio, C., Mecella, M., Russo, A.: Knowledge-intensive processes: characteristics, requirements and analysis of contemporary approaches. J. Data Semant. pp. 1–29 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Der Aalst, W.M.P., Berens, P.J.S.: Beyond workflow management: product-driven case handling. In: Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP, pp. 42–51. ACM Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reijers, H.A., Rigter, J., Van Der Aalst, W.M.P.: The case handling case. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 12(3), 365–391 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    OMG. Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN), version 1.0, May 2014. Document formal/2014-05-05Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marin, M., Hull, R., Vaculín, R.: Data centric BPM and the emerging case management standard: a short survey. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 24–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pesic, M., van der Aalst, W.M.: A declarative approach for flexible business processes management. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muehlen, Mz, Recker, J.: How much language is enough? theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 465–479. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marin, M.A., Lotriet, H., Van Der Poll, J.A.: Measuring method complexity of the case management modeling and notation (CMMN). In: Proceedings of the Southern African Institute for Computer Scientist and Information Technologists Annual Conference 2014 on SAICSIT 2014 Empowered by Technology. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hauder, M., Pigat, S., Matthes, F.: Research challenges in adaptive case management: a literature review. In: 3rd International Workshop on Adaptive Case Management and other non-workflow approaches to BPM (AdaptiveCM), Ulm, Germany (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mundbrod, N., Reichert, M.: Process-aware task management support for knowledge-intensive business processes: findings, challenges, requirements. In: 3rd International Workshop on Adaptive Case Management and other non-workflow approaches to BPM (AdaptiveCM), Ulm, Germany (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bry, F., Schaffert, S., Vrandečić, D., Weiand, K.: Semantic Wikis: approaches, applications, and perspectives. In: Eiter, T., Krennwallner, T. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2012. LNCS, vol. 7487, pp. 329–369. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haake, A., Lukosch, S., Schümmer, T.: Wiki-templates: adding structure support to wikis on demand. In WikiSym 2005, pp. 41–51. ACM Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Michel, F., Gil, Y., Ratnakar, V., Hauder, M.: A task-centered interface for on-line collaboration in science. In: Proceedings of the 20th International ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), Atlanta, USA (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Voigt, S., Fuchs-Kittowski, F., Gohr, A.: Structured Wikis: application oriented use cases. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Open Collaboration. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matthes, F., Neubert, C., Steinhoff, A.: Hybrid Wikis: empowering users to collaboratively structure information. In: ICSOFT (1) (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Swenson, K.D.: Designing for an innovative learning organization. In: 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC). IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schönig, S., Zeising, M., Jablonski, S.: Supporting collaborative work by learning process models and patterns from cases. In: 2013 9th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom). IEEE (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Software Engineering for Business Information SystemsTechnical University MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Software Engineering InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations