Skip to main content
  • 964 Accesses

Abstract

Performance measurement is an evaluative function within programs or organizations that involves systematically and regularly tracking indicators of outputs, outcomes, and impacts. This information enables stakeholders to take timely corrective action and increase the likelihood for program success. Effective performance measurement largely depends on the use of appropriate indicators. Indicators are operationalization of program results (outcomes and impacts). Inaccuracy in the use of appropriate indicators affects construct validity. Preconditions for construct validity of indicators include specificity, clarity, directness, achievability, relevance, and adequacy. Assumptions arise whenever these preconditions are unexamined or taken for granted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American International Health Alliance. (2004). Monitoring & evaluation toolkit for new partners. Washington, DC: American International Health Alliance, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (2011). The community builder’s approach to theory of change: A practical guide to theory development. New York: The Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation in Development, Development Assistance Committee (OECD DAC). (2002). Glossary of key terms in evaluation and results based management. www.oecd.org. Accessed 26 Dec 14.

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation in Development (OECD). (2008). Handbook for constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. www.oecd.org/publishing/corrigenda. Accessed 26 Dec 14.

  • Poister, T. H. (2010). Performance Measurement: Monitoring Program Outcomes. In Joseph S. Wholey, Harry P. Hatry, & Kathryn E. Newcomer (Eds). Handbook for Practical Program Evaluation, 100–124. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID. (1996a). Performance Monitoring and Evaluation TIPS. Establishing Performance Targets. USAID Center for Development Information and Evaluation. Number 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID. (1996b). Performance Monitoring and Evaluation TIPS. Selecting performance indicators. USAID Center for Development Information and Evaluation. Number 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID. (2000). Performance Monitoring and Evaluation TIPS. Building a Results Framework. USAID Center for Development Information and Evaluation. Number 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Vision. (2011). Child well-being targets: Setting the levels of change. Global Office of Strategy management. Unpublished presentation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Apollo M. Nkwake .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nkwake, A. (2015). Validity in Performance Measurement. In: Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19021-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics