Situating CIS: The Importance of Context in Collaborative Information Seeking

  • Kristine Newman
  • Simon Knight
  • Preben Hansen
  • Stefanie Elbeshausen
Part of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work book series (CSCW)


Collaborative Information Seeking (CIS) is common in many professional contexts. This chapter discusses CIS from four different perspectives – education, healthcare, science research and patent research. We first introduce the CIS context, focusing on Evans and Chi’s proposed model of social search. We highlight the ways contextual factors relate to the search process, in particular noting the role of communication in CIS processes. The four example professional contexts are discussed with reference to the ‘medium’ of collaboration, the ways CIS is conducted, the tools used and physical setting of CIS, and the ‘context’ of CIS, the purposes for which an instance of CIS occurs in that discipline. We suggest that these contextual factors can be aligned with, but are additional to, the existing Evans and Chi model of social search, and that their addition in a ‘pre- and post-model’ extension could provide a shared framework for researching contextual features of CIS. In highlighting commonalities and contrasts across the disciplinary contexts we suggest that a developed model, and further research, is needed to understand the relationship between motivations in these different disciplines and the evaluation of CIS episodes, and the role of processes, particularly communication, in those episodes. In order to evaluate CIS in different disciplines future research should focus on the between, and within discipline differences in the purposes of CIS. Characteristics of success in different disciplinary contexts may relate both to the consideration of the collaborative context, and the information need; developing deeper understanding of this point.


Collaboration Context Professional disciplines Communication Search Information seeking CSCL CSCW 


  1. Evans BM, Chi EH (2010) An elaborated model of social search. Inf Process Manag 46(6):656–678. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2009.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hansen P (2011) Task-based information seeking and retrieval in the patent domain. processes and relationships. Doctoral thesis, Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1631.
  3. Hansen P (2013) Initial design of CIS and making sense in an Ad-Hoc team-based crisis situation. Workshop on collaborative information seeking: consolidating the past, creating the future. Workshop in conjunction to the CSCW 2013 conference, San Antonio, Feb 2013Google Scholar
  4. Hansen P, Järvelin K (2000) The information seeking and retrieval process at the swedish patent- and registration office. Moving from Lab-based to real life work-task environment. In: Proceedings of the ACM-SIGIR 2000 workshop on patent retrieval, Athens, 28 July 2000, pp 43–53Google Scholar
  5. Hansen P, Järvelin K (2005) Collaborative information retrieval in an information-intensive domain. Inf Process Manag 41(5):1101–1119, Sept 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hansen P, Järvelin A, Järvelin A (2013) Exploring manual and automatic query formulation in patent IR, Initial query construction and query generation process. Int J Doc 69(6):873–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hertzum M (2008) Collaborative information seeking: the combined activity of information seeking and collaborative grounding. Inf Process Manag 44(2):957–962. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knight S, Littleton K (2015) Learning through collaborative information seeking. In: Hansen P, Shah C, Klas CP (eds) Collaborative information seeking. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuiper E, Volman M, Terwel J (2009) Developing web literacy in collaborative inquiry activities. Comput Educ 52(3):668–680. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lazonder AW (2005) Do two heads search better than one? Effects of student collaboration on web search behaviour and search outcomes. Br J Educ Technol 36(3):465–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00478.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marshall AP, West SH, Aitken LM (2011) Preferred information sources for clinical decision making: critical care nurses’ perceptions of information accessibility and usefulness. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 8(4):224–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McKnight M, Peet M (2000) Health care providers’ information seeking. Med Ref Serv Q 19(2):27–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Reddy MC, Jansen BJ (2008) A model for understanding collaborative information behavior in context: a study of two healthcare teams. Inf Process Manag 44:256–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shah C (2012) Information retrieval: collaborative information seeking: the art and science of making the whole greater than the sum of all. Springer, Berlin/LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Shah C (2013) Effects of awareness on coordination in collaborative information seeking. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol n/a–n/a. doi: 10.1002/asi.22819
  16. Shah C, González‐Ibáñez R (2010) Exploring information seeking processes in collaborative search tasks. Proc Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 47(1):1–7. doi: 10.1002/meet.14504701211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shah C, Marchionini G (2010) Awareness in collaborative information seeking. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 61(10):1970–1986. doi: 10.1002/asi.21379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shah C, Hansen P, Capra R (2013) Collaborative information seeking: consolidating the past, creating the future. In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer supported cooperative work companion, ACM, pp 321–326Google Scholar
  19. Spence PR, Reddy MC, Hall R (2005) A survey of collaborative information seeking practices of academic researchers. In: Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work – GROUP ‘05Google Scholar
  20. Talja S, Hansen P (2006) Information sharing. In: Spink A, Cole C (eds) New directions in human information behavior, vol 8, Information science and knowledge management series. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yue Z, Han S, He D (2012) Search tactics in collaborative exploratory web search. In: Proceedings of HCIR 2012, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristine Newman
    • 1
  • Simon Knight
    • 2
  • Preben Hansen
    • 3
  • Stefanie Elbeshausen
    • 4
  1. 1.Daphne Cockwell School of NursingRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Knowledge Media Institute, Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  3. 3.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Department of Information Science & Natural Language ProcessingUniversity of HildesheimHildesheimGermany

Personalised recommendations