Advertisement

State and County Level 2010 U.S. Census Coverage Rates for Young Children

  • William P. O’Hare
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Population Studies book series (BRIEFSPOPULAT)

Abstract

The national net undercount rate for young children masks large differences across states and counties. State-level census coverage rates for age 0–4 range from a net undercount of 10.2 % in Arizona to a 2.1 % overcount in North Dakota. State net undercount rates for children age 0–4 are correlated with state population size, racial/Hispanic composition as well as several Hard-to-Count characteristics such as linguistic isolation, education, and employment. The net undercount of young children is concentrated in the largest counties. The 128 largest counties, all with populations of 500,000 or more, account of 77 % of the total net undercount for age 0–4.

Keywords

Subnational census coverage State undercount rates County undercount rates 

References

  1. Adlakha, A. L., Robinson, J. G., West, K. K., & Bruce, A. (2003). Assessment of consistency of census data with demographic benchmarks at the subnational level. Census 2000 Evaluation 0.20 U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  2. Bruce, A., Robinson. J. G., & Sanders, M. V. (2001). Hart-to-count scores and broad demographic groups associated with patterns of response rates in census 2000. In Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. Bruce, A., & Robinson, J. G. (2003). The planning database: Its development and use as an effective tool in census 2000. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Demographic Association, Arlington, VA Oct 24.Google Scholar
  4. Bruce, A., & Robinson, J. G. (2007). Tract-Level planning database with census 2000 census data. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. Bruce, A., Robinson. J. G., & Devine J. E. (2012). A planning database to identify areas that are hard-to-enumerate and hard to survey in the United States. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Methods for Surveying and Enumerating Hard-to-Reach Populations, American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  6. Cohn, D. (2011). State population estimates and census 2010 counts: Did they match? Pew Social and Demographic Trends, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC. January 12.Google Scholar
  7. Darga, K. (1999). Sampling and the census. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, S. T. (1994). Evaluation of post census county estimates for the 1980s. Current Population reports, (Series P-25, No. 963, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  9. Erdman, C., & Bates, N. (2014). The census bureau mail return rate challenge: Crowdsourcing to development hard-to-count scores. Washington, DC: U.S Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  10. Felton, G. T. (1986). Evaluation of population estimation procedures for counties: 1980. Current Population Reports, (P-25, NO. 984, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  11. Gormley, W. T. (2012). Voices for children: Rhetoric and public policy. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, R. B., & Steffes, R. B. (1973). Estimating the 1970 census undercount for state and local areas. Washington, DC: National Urban League.Google Scholar
  13. Isaki, C. T., Schultz, L. K., Smith, P. J., & Diffendal, G. (1985). Small Area Estimation Research for Census Undercount—Progress Report. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Small Area Statistics, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Ottawa, Canada, May.Google Scholar
  14. Mayol-Garcia, Y., & Robinson, J. G. (2011). Census 2010 counts compared to the 2010 population estimates by demographic characteristics. Poster presented at the Southern Demographic Association Conference, October, Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
  15. O’Hare, W. P. (1988). How to evaluate population estimates. American Demographics, 10(1).Google Scholar
  16. O’Hare, W. P. (2013). Difference between 2010 census counts and Vintage 2010 population estimates for age 0–4 at the state and county level. Poster presented at the 2013 Annual Conference of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  17. O’Hare, W. P. (2014a). Estimating the net undercount of young children in the 2010 U.S. census at the county level. Poster presented at the 2014 Population Association of America Conference, Boston, MA. April.Google Scholar
  18. O’Hare, W. P. (2014b). State-level 2010 census coverage rates for young children. Population Research and Policy Review, 33(6), 797–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Hare, W. P. (2014c). Assessing net coverage for young children in the 2010 U.S. decennial census. International Journal of Population Research, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/671715.
  20. Robinson, J. G., Bashir, A., & Fernandez, E. W. (1993). Demographic analysis as an expanded program for early coverage evaluation of the 2000 census. 1993 Annual Research Conference, March 21–24, Arlington VA.Google Scholar
  21. Robinson, J. G., & Kobilaric, E. L. (1995). Identifying differential undercounts at local geographic levels: A targeting database approach. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  22. Schwede, L., Terry, R., & Hunter, J. (2015). Ethnographic evaluations on coverage of hard-to-count minority in the US decennial censuses. In R. Tourangeau, B. Edwards, T. P. Johnson, K. M. Wolter, & N. Bates (Eds.), Hart-to-survey populations (pp. 293–315). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Siegel, J. S., Passel, J. S., Rives, N. W., & Robinson, J. G. (1977). Developmental estimates of the coverage of the population of states in the 1970 census: Demographic analysis. Current Population Reports, Special Studies, (Series P-23, No. 65), December, 1977.Google Scholar
  24. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012a). Documentation for the revised 2010 demographic analysis middle series estimates. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  25. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012b). Population estimation methodology. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). Planning database with 2010 census and 2008-2012 American community survey data: At the tract level. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  27. Velkoff, V. (2011). Demographic evaluation of the 2010 census. Paper presented at the 2011 Population Association of America annual Conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  28. Yowell, T., & Devine, J. (2013). Evaluating current and alternative methods to produce 2010 county population estimates. Population Division Working Paper 100, U.S. Bureau of the Census. Washington DC, July, 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.O’Hare Data and Demographic Services LLCEllicott CityUSA

Personalised recommendations