Advertisement

Historical Examination of Net Coverage for Children in the U.S. Decennial Census: 1950 to 2010

  • William P. O’HareEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Population Studies book series (BRIEFSPOPULAT)

Abstract

U.S. Decennial Censuses from 1950 to 2010 are examined to distill patterns in net undercount rates by age. The coverage rates of children are compared to those of adults then patterns for young children are compared to older children. From 1950 to 1980, the net undercount rates of all age groups fell and the differences among the undercount rates for different age groups were not large. The net undercount rate of young children went from 1.4 % in 1980 to 4.6 % in the 2010 Census. Over the same time period, the net undercount rate of adults continued the decline witnessed between 1950 and 1980. The net undercount rates for Blacks are higher than those of Non-Blacks in every census from 1950 to 2010.

Keywords

Net coverage Undercount Children 

References

  1. Fay, R. E., Passel, J. S., Robinson, J. G., & Cowan, C. D. (1988). The coverage of the population in the 1980 census, U.S. Census of Population and Housing, Evaluation and Research Reports, PHC80-E4, U.S Census Bureau, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  2. Hogan, H. (2013). Presentation at the 2013 joint statistical meetings, Montreal.Google Scholar
  3. O’Hare, W. P. (2014). Historical examination of net coverage error for children in the U.S. decennial census: 1950 to 2010. In Center for Survey Measurement Study Series (Survey Methodology #2014-03). U.S. Census Bureau, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  4. Prewitt, K. (2013). What is Your Race?: The Census and our flawed efforts to classify americans. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  5. Robinson, J. G., Bashir, A., Das Dupta, P., & Woodward, K. A. (1993). Estimates of population coverage in the 1990 United States U.S. decennial census based on demographic analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(423), 1061–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). Technical Assessment of A.C.E. Revision II, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  7. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (2001). Guidance on aggregation and allocation of data on race for use in civil rights monitoring and enforcement.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.O’Hare Data and Demographic Services LLCEllicott CityUSA

Personalised recommendations