Abstract
Given the tremendous distances involved, expeditions to other planets will result in communication time delays and the inability to resupply or rescue crewmembers at short notice in the event of an emergency. This means that the crews will have to respond to their own crises and develop ways of dealing with the mission objectives autonomously. In contrast, during near-Earth missions on orbit or to the Moon, people on Earth still will be involved with mission planning and provide important support for crewmembers. This chapter takes a closer look at the relationship between space crews and people on the ground under autonomous conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kelly, A. D., & Kanas, N. (1993). Communication between space crews and ground personnel: A survey of astronauts and cosmonauts. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 64, 795–800.
Gushin, V. I., Zaprisa, N. S., Kolinitchenko, T. B., Efimov, V. A., Smirnova, T. M., Vinokhodova, A. G., et al. (1997). Content analysis of the crew communication with external communicants under prolonged isolation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 68, 1093–1098.
Santy, P. A., Holland, A. W., Looper, L., & Marcondes-North, R. (1993). Multicultural factors in the space environment: Results of an international shuttle crew debrief. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 64, 196–200.
Leach, D. J., Wall, T. D., Rogelberg, S. G., & Jackson, P. R. (2005). Team autonomy, performance, and member job strain: Uncovering the teamwork KSA link. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 1–24.
Morgeson, F. P., Delaney-Klinger, K., & Hemingway, M. A. (2005). The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 399–406.
Rasmussen, T. H., & Jeppesen, H. J. (2006). Teamwork and associated psychological factors: A review. Work & Stress, 20, 105–128.
Van Mierlo, H., Rutte, C. G., Vermunt, J. K., Kompier, M. A., & Doorewaard, J. A. C. M. (2007). A multi-level mediation model of the relationships between team autonomy, individual task design and psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 647–664.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 170–180.
Kanas, N., Saylor, S., Harris, M., Neylan, T., Boyd, J., Weiss, D. S., et al. (2010). High vs. low crewmember autonomy in space simulation environments. Acta Astronautica, 67, 731–738.
Kanas, N., Gushin, V., & Yusupova, A. (2008). Problems and possibilities of astronauts: Ground communication content analysis validity check. Acta Astronautica, 63, 822–827.
Sandal, G. M., Bye, H. H., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). The risk for groupthink during long-duration space missions: Results from a 105-day confinement study. In D. A. Vakoch (Ed.), On orbit and beyond: Psychological perspectives on human spaceflight. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Roma, P. G., Hursh, S. R., Hienz, R. D., Brinson, Z. S., Gasior, E. D., & Brady, J. V. (2013). Effects of autonomous mission management on crew performance, behavior, and physiology: Insight from ground-based experiments. In D. A. Vakoch (Ed.), On orbit and beyond: Psychological perspectives on human spaceflight. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kanas, N. (2015). Autonomy and the Crew–Ground Interaction. In: Humans in Space. Springer Praxis Books(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18869-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18869-0_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18868-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18869-0
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)