Fuzzy Logic and Modern Economics

  • Francesc TrillasEmail author
Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 325)


Fuzzy Logic has made two important contributions to economic analysis: a theory of fuzzy preferences, and the development of empirical techniques based on fuzzy sets. However, modern areas of economic research are not sufficiently influenced by these ideas. Behavioral and institutional economics, among other fields in modern economics, would benefit from insights from fuzzy logic.


Fuzzy Logic Corporate Governance Public Choice Neoclassical Economic Governance Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Aliev, R.A.: Fundamentals of the Fuzzy Logic-Based Generalized Theory of Decisions. Springer, Berlin (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aoki, M.: Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basu, K.: Fuzzy revealed preference theory. J. Econ. Theory 32, 212–227 (1984)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basu, K.: Axioms for a fuzzy measure of inequality. Math. Soc. Sci. 275–288 (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Basu, K.: Beyond the Invisible Hand. Groundwork for a New Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beinhocker, E.: The Origin of Wealth. The Radical Remaking of Economics and What It Means for Business and Society. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bowles, S.: Microeconomics. Behaviour, Institutions and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    García Castro, R., Aguilera, R.V., Ariño, M.A.: Bundles of Corporate Governance Mechanims: A Fuzzy Set Analysis. Mimeo (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Georgescu, I.: Fuzzy Choice Functions: A Revealed Preference Approach. Springer, Berlin (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hermann-Pillath, C.: Making sense of institutional change in China: the cultural dimension of economic growth and modernization. In: Aoki, M., Kuran, T., Roland, G. (eds.) Institutions and Comparative Economic Development. IEA Conference, vol. 150-I, Chapter 13. Palgrave Macmillan (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kahneman, D.: Thinking. Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Munro, A.: Bounded Rationality and Public Policy. A Perspective from Behavioural Economics. Springer, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ostrom, E.: Beyond Markets and States. Nobel Prize Lecture (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Palacios-Huerta, I.: Professionals play minimax. Rev. Econ. Stud. 70(2), 395–415 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Piggins, A., Salles, M.: Instances of indeterminacy. Anal. Krit. 29, 311–328 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ragin, C.C.: Fuzzy-Set Social Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sen, A.: Identity and Violence. The Illusion of Destiny. Penguin Books, London (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sen, A.: The Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press, Harvard (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Silver, N.: The Signal and the Noise. Why So Many Predictions Fail—But Some Don’t. The Penguin Press, London (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stern, N.: Imperfections in the economics of public policy, imperfections in markets, and climate change, presidential address to the European economic association, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 8(2–3), 253–288 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stiglitz, J.: The Price of Inequality. Norton and Company, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sugden, R.: The role of salience in the emergence and reproduction of norms. In: Aoki, M., Binmore, K., Deakin, S., Gintis, H. (eds.) Complexity and Institutions: Markets, Norms and Corporations. IEA Conference, Chapter 6. Palgrave Macmillan (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vu, T.M., Siebers, P.-O., Wagner, C.: Comparisons of crisp systems and fuzzy systems in agent-based simulation. A case study of Soccer penalties. In: 13th UK Workshop Computational Intelligence (UKCI), pp. 54–61 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universìtat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus de Bellaterra 1BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations