Crisis’ Origin’s Causes. Contributions from the Fuzzy Logic in the Sustainability on the Socio-Economic Systems

  • Anna M. Gil-LafuenteEmail author
  • Alexandra Balvey
Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 325)


The deep economic crisis where we are immersed, together with the recuperation perspectives, intensifies the efforts in the socioeconomic field to find new solutions to prevent the current involution process. One of the key factors to achieve this goal is based in rationalization and the outlay containment. But obviously, this purpose is not enough by itself, and will not make the real economy improve (the one which is perceived by all citizens, which becomes permeable in all social layers, and the one which allows a permanent welfare), and will never stay up longer than a short term. It is important to accompany these scarifying measures imposed to the citizenship with adequate politics, depending on the selected objectives. Just like that, we need to prioritize the expenses and inversions, which could generate wide multiplying effects in the economy.


Incidence Relation Rough Path Social Science Field Social Layer Austere Budget 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Aristotele: Obras. Lógica. De la expresión o Interpretación, Aguilar (1977)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Einstein, A., Speziali, P., Besso, M.: Correspondance 1903–1955. Hermann (1972)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gil-Aluja, J.: Lances y desventuras del nuevo paradigma de la teoría de la decisión. In: Proceedings del III Congreso SIGEF. Buenos Aires, pp. 10–13 (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gil-Aluja, J.: Elements for a Theory of Decisión in Uncertainty, vol. 32. Kluwer, London (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gil-Aluja, J.: Reflexiones ante un nuevo pensamiento económico. Ed. CIDEM, Morelia (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gil-Aluja, J., Gil-Lafuente, A.M.: Pretopology. In: Towards an Advanced Modelling of Complex Economic Phenomena, pp. 3–27. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., Thaler, R.H.: Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econ. Perspect. 5(1), 193–206 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaufmann, A., Aluja, J.G.: Modelos para la investigación de efectos olvidados, Milladoiro (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Łukasiewicz, J.: O zasadzie wylaczonego srodka. Przegl’d Filozficzny 13, 372–373 (1910)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stiglitz, J.: El precio de la desigualdad. Taurus (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations