Skip to main content

Design Science for Future AIS: Transferring Continuous Auditing Issues to a Gradual Methodology

  • Conference paper
  • 4060 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9073))

Abstract

The tightened legal framework and technical evolution increase the relevance of effective Accounting Information Systems (AIS). In this context, researchers and practitioners predict the transition from traditional auditing to automated Continuous Auditing (CA). However, the organizational implementation of CA is still an unsolved problem in AIS research. To face this challenge, the authors of this paper used a Design Science Research (DSR) model considering the characteristics of CA. The proposed artifact in this paper is a gradual methodology which addresses general issues of CA implementation projects. The authors evaluate this artifact in an argumentatively descriptive way before stating limitations and giving an outlook on future research. Ultimately, the authors believe that the proposed methodology as well as the DSR approach for CA research contribute to the knowledge base and set the baseline for further investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Public Law No. 107-204. Washington, DC Gov. Print. Off. 107 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. European Commission: Commissioner Michel Barnier welcomes provisional agreement in trilogue on the reform of the audit sector, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-1171_en.htm

  3. Vasarhelyi, M.A., Chan, D.Y., Krahel, J.P.: Consequences of XBRL standardization on financial statement data. J. Inf. Syst. 26, 155–167 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abbasi, A., Albrecht, C., Vance, A., Hansen, J.: Metafraud: a meta-learning framework for detecting financial fraud. MIS Q. 36, 1293–1327 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fochler, K., Schmidt, A.H., Paffrath, R.: IT-Revision 3.0—Herausforderungen für die interne IT-Revision. HMD Prax. der Wirtschaftsinformatik 50, 20–30 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Byrnes, P.E., Al-Awadhi, A., Gullvist, B., Brown-Liburd, H., Teeter, R.: J. Donald Warren, J., Vasarhelyi, M.: AICPA: Evolution of Auditing: From the Traditional Approach to the Future Audit, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rajan, S., van Ginkel, W., Sundaresan, N.: Cloud Security Alliance (CSA): Top Ten Big Data Security and Privacy Challenges (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bojilov, M., Chew, R., Kaitano, F., Zororo, T.: ISACA: Privacy & Big Data (Whitepaper), Rolling Meadows, IL, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chew, R., Genicola, K., Li, B., Philip, J., Tichanona, Z.: ISACA: Big Data Impacts & Benefits (Whitepaper), Rolling Meadows, IL, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bhagat, B., Chagpar, Z., Chapela, V., Gee, W., Marks, N., Pasfield, J.: ISACA: Generating Value from Big Data Analytics (Whitepaper), Rolling Meadows, IL, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15, 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. AICPA: Responsibilities and Functions of the Independent Auditor. SAS No. 1, section 110; SAS No. 78; SAS No. 82, United States of America (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  14. IFAC: International Standard on Auditing 200. In: Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements, p. 74. International Federation of Accountants, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Byrnes, P.E., Ames, B., Vasarhelyi, M., Warren Jr., J.D.: AICPA: The Current State of Continuous Auditing and Continuous Monitoring (Whitepaper), New York, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kiesow, A., Bittmann, S., Thomas, O.: IT Support through CAATTs - Systematic Requirements Analysis and Design for Process Audit. In: 20th Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2014), August 7-10, Association for Information Systems (AIS), Savannah (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kiesow, A., Zarvic, N., Thomas, O.: Continuous Auditing in Big Data Computing Environments: Towards an Integrated Audit Approach by Using CAATTs. In: Management of Complex IT-Systems and Applications (MITA) - INFORMATIK 2014, Stuttgart, Germany, September 22-26. Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), vol. 44.Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V, GI (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37, 337–356 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Majdalawieh, M., Sahraoui, S., Barkhi, R.: Intra/inter process continuous auditing (IIPCA), integrating CA within an enterprise system environment. Bus. Process Manag. J. 18, 304–327 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Geerts, G.L.: A design science research methodology and its application to accounting information systems research. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 12, 142–151 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Österle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., Loos, P., Mertens, P., Oberweis, A., Sinz, E.J.: Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 20, 7–10 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rezaee, Z., Elam, R., Sharbatoghlie, A.: Continuous auditing: the audit of the future. Manag. Audit. J. 16, 150–158 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ISACA Standards Board: Continuous Auditing: Is It Fantasy or Reality? Inf. Syst. Control Journal 5 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alles, M.G., Kogan, A., Vasarhelyi, M.A.: Putting continuous auditing theory into practice: Lessons from two pilot implementations. J. Inf. Syst. 22, 195–214 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sun, C.-M.: From CAATTs Adoption to Continuous Auditing Systems Implementation: An Analysis Based on Organizational Routines Theories. MIS Rev. An Int. J. 17, 59–85 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vasarhelyi, M.A., Alles, M.G., Kogan, A.: Principles of analytic monitoring for continuous assurance. J. Emerg. Technol. Account. 1, 1–21 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vasarhelyi, M.A., Alles, M., Kuenkaikaewa, S., Littley, J.: The acceptance and adoption of continuous auditing by internal auditors: A micro analysis. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 13, 267–281 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gregor, S.: The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q. 30, 611–642 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hevner, A.R.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 4 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Meredith, J.R., Mantel Jr., S.J.: Project management: a managerial approach. John Wiley & Sons (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC): International Standard on Auditing 320. In: Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements, pp. 21–329. International Federation of Accountants, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schultz, M., Müller-Wickop, N., Nüttgens, M.: Key Information Requirements for Process Audits – an Expert Perspective. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, pp. 137–150. EMISA, Vienna (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. IFAC: International Standard on Auditing 315. In: Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements, pp. 267–320. International Federation of Accountants, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Eulerich, M., Kalinichenko, A.: Die Continuous Auditing - Diskussion aus wissenschaftlicher Sicht. Zeitschrift Interne Revis. 49, 34–45 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Niemöller, C., Özcan, D., Metzger, D., Thomas, O.: Towards a Design Science-Driven Product-Service System Engineering Methodology. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds.) DESRIST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8463, pp. 180–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Kiesow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kiesow, A., Zarvić, N., Thomas, O. (2015). Design Science for Future AIS: Transferring Continuous Auditing Issues to a Gradual Methodology. In: Donnellan, B., Helfert, M., Kenneally, J., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Winter, R. (eds) New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda. DESRIST 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9073. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18713-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18714-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics