Skip to main content

Social Network Analysis: A Brief Introduction to the Theory

  • Conference paper
Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2014

Abstract

Social networks are self-organizing, emergent, and complex, such that a pattern appears from the interaction of the elements that make up the system (Newman M, Barabási AL, Watts DJ. The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton studies in complexity. Princeton University Press, Oxford, 2006). These patterns become more apparent as network size increases. Social network analysis is a collection of concepts, measures, and techniques for relational analysis. It is an approach that is specifically designed to grasp the most important features of social structures and it is unrivalled in this task. It can be used to explore social relations themselves and also the cultural structures of norms and ideas that help to organize those relations in conjunction with material circumstances. The study discusses the ways in which relational and cultural structures can be investigated with a few simple network concepts. Theories of social structure inform and sustain the methods of social network analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barnes J (1954) Class and committees in a Norwegian Island Parish. Hum Relat 7:39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brass DJ (1992) Power in organizations: a social network perspective. Res Polit Soc 4:295–323

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borgatti SP, Foster PC (2003) The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. J Manag 29:991–1013

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barabási A-L (2003) Linked: how everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life. Plum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burt RS (1976) Positions in networks. Soc Forces 55:93–122

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Burt RS (1982) Toward a structural theory of action. Academic, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cranmer SJ, Desmarais BA (2011) Inferential network analysis with exponential random graph models. Polit Anal 19(1):66–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de Nooy W (2012) Graph theoretical approaches to social network analysis. In: Meyers RA (ed) Computational complexity: theory, techniques, and applications. Springer, New York, pp 2864–2877. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1800 9_176. ISBN 978-1-4614-1800-9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones C, Volpe EH (2011) Organizational identification: extending our understanding of social identities through social networks. J Organ Behav 32:413–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kadushin C (2012) Understanding social networks: theories, concepts, and findings. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lincoln JR. (1982) Intra (and inter-) organizational networks. In: Bacharach SB (eds) Research in the sociology of organizations, vol 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reis HT, Collins WA (2004) Relationships, human behavior and psychological science. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 13:233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Riketta M, Nienber S (2007) Multiple identities and work motivation: the role of perceived compatibility between nested organizational units. Br J Manag 18:61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Strogatz SH (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature 410:268–276. doi:10.1038/35065725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tichy N, Fombrun C (1979) Network analysis in organizational settings. Hum Relat 32:923–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tichy NM, Tushman ML, Fombrun C (1979) Social network analysis for organizations. Acad Manage Rev 4:507–519

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Şefika Şule Erçetin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Erçetin, Ş.Ş., Neyişci, N.B. (2016). Social Network Analysis: A Brief Introduction to the Theory. In: Erçetin, Ş. (eds) Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2014. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18693-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics