Abstract
New employee safety is partly determined by how members of an organization behave toward them when they begin work. Research suggests that how members of an organization behave toward a new employee is partly determined by the employees’ perceptions of what the organization has done during the recruitment and selection processes (what they have done to hire the new employee). Where employees think that organizational processes have successfully delivered a new employee who is able to, and will work safely, they may be less inclined to engage in behaviors to ensure the new employee’s, or indeed their own, safety. In this chapter, research on how employees perceive recruitment and selection processes, and how these perceptions can influence the employees’ perception of new employee risk, and how they behave toward a new employee is discussed. This chapter also examines recruitment and selection processes, with a particular emphasis on methods which can be used by an organization to assess (predict) a new employee’s safety behavior. Recommendations for the adoption of recruitment and selection processes, and procedures to ensure employees correctly perceive the organization’s ability to predict new employee safety behavior, and ways of ensuring employees behave appropriately toward new employees, are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arthur, W, Jr, Woehr, D. J., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Personality testing in employment settings: Problems and issues in the application of typical selection practices. Personnel Review, 30(6), 657–676.
Aschenbrenner, M., & Biehl, B. (1994). Improving safety through improved technical measures? Empirical studies regarding risk compensation processes in relation to anti-lock brake systems. In R. M. Trimpop & G. J. S. Wilde (Eds.), Changes in accident prevention: The issue of risk compensation. Groningen, The Netherlands: Styx Publications.
Barclay, J. M. (2001). Improving selection interviews with structure: Organisations’ use of behavioral interviews. Personnel Review, 30(1–2), 81–101.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
Brannick, M. T., Levine, E. L., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Job and work analysis: Methods, research and applications for human resources management. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Breaugh, J. A. (2008). Employee recruitment: Current knowledge and important areas for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 103–118.
Breaugh, J. A. (2013). Employee recruitment. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 389–416.
Breaugh, J. A., & Starke, M. (2000). Research on employee recruitment: So many studies, so many remaining questions. Journal of Management, 26(3), 405–434.
Burt, C. D. B., Chmiel, N., & Hayes, P. (2009). Implications of turnover for safety attitudes and behaviour in work teams. Safety Science, 47, 1002–1006.
Burt, C. D. B., & Hislop, H. (2013). Developing safety specific trust in new recruits: The dilemma and a possible solution. Journal of Health, Safety and Environment, 29(3), 161–173.
Burt, C. D. B., & Stevenson, R. J. (2009). The relationship between recruitment processes, familiarity, trust, perceived risk and safety. Journal of Safety Research, 40, 365–369.
Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655–702.
Chao, E. L. & Henshaw, J. L. (2002). Job hazard analysis. OSHA publication 3071 2002 (revised). Occupational safety and health administration, US Department of Labor, Washington.
Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1103–1127.
Clarke, S., & Robertson, I. T. (2005). A meta-analytic review of the Big Five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 355–376.
Clarke, S., & Robertson, I. T. (2008). An examination of the role of personality in work accidents using meta-analysis. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(1), 94–108.
Cohen, A. (1977). Factors in successful occupational safety programs. Journal of Safety Research, 9, 168–178.
Conchie, S. M., & Donald, I. J. (2008). The functions and development of safety-specific trust and distrust. Safety Science, 46, 92–103.
Cui, L., Fan, D., Fu, G., & Zhu, C. J. (2013). An integrative model of organizational safety behavior. Journal of Safety Research, 45, 37–46.
Dahlback, O. (1990). Personality and risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1235–1242.
Dahlback, O. (1991). Accident-proneness and risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 79–85.
Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1977). The place of impulsiveness in a dimensions system of personality description. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 57–68.
Flanagan, (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358.
Fleishman, E. A., & Reilly, M. E. (1995). Handbook of human abilities: Definitions, measurement, and job task requirements. Management Research Institute.
Ford, M. T., & Wiggins, B. K. (2012). Occupational-level interactions between physical hazards and cognitive ability and skill requirements in predicting incidence rates. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(3), 268–278.
Glendon, A. I., Hoyes, T. W., Haigney, D. E., & Taylor, R. G. (1996). A review of risk homeostasis theory in simulated environments. Safety Science, 22, 15–25.
Grandell-Niemi, H., Hupli, M., Leino-Kipli, H., & Puukka, P. (2003). Medication calculation skills of nurses in Finland. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12, 519–528.
Grandjean, E. (1985). Fitting the task to the man: An ergonomic approach. London: Taylor & Francis.
Grant, B. A. & Smiley, A. (1993). Driver response to antilock brakes: A demonstration of behavioral adaption. In Proceedings, Canadian Multidisciplinary Road safety Conference VIII, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, June 14–16, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: University of Saskatchewan.
Greenwood, M., & Woods, H. M. (1919). A report on the incidence of industrial accidents with special reference to multiple accidents. Report 4, Industrial Fatigue Research Board.
Hogan, J., & Foster, J. (2013). Multifaceted personality predictors of workplace safety performance: More than conscientiousness. Human Performance, 26, 20–43.
Hsiao, H. (2013). Anthropometric procedures for protective equipment sizing and design. Human Factors, 55(1), 6–35.
Huffcutt, A. I. (2011). An empirical review of the employment interview construct literature. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(1), 62–81.
Kethley, R. B., & Terpstra, D. E. (2005). An analysis of litigation associated with the use of the application form in the selection process. Public Personnel Management, 34(4), 357–375.
Lee, S., & Bro, R. (2008). Regional differences in world human body dimensions: The multi-way analysis approach. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9(4), 325–345.
Levashina, J., Hartwell, C. J., Morgenson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 241–293.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford.
McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14, 91–103.
McGovern, P. M., Vesley, D., Kochevar, L., Gershon, R., Rhame, F. S., & Anderson, E. (2000). Factors affecting universal precaution compliance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15, 149–161.
McMullan, M., Jones, R., & Lea, S. (2010). Patient safety: Numerical skills and drug calculation abilities of nursing students and registered nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(4), 891–899.
Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (1997). Social and cognitive sources of potential inaccuracy in job analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 627–655.
Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 683–729.
Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2004). Safety climate and safety at work. In J. Barling & M. Frone (Eds.), The psychology of work place safety (pp. 15–34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Pelot, R. P., Dwyer, J. W., Deakin, J. M., & McCabe, J. F. (1999). The design of a simulated forcible entry test for fire fighters. Applied Ergonomics, 30, 137–146.
Postlethwaite, B., Robbins, S., Rickerson, J., & McKinniss, T. (2009). The moderation of conscientiousness by cognitive ability when predicting workplace safety behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 711–716.
Prien, E. P., Goodstein, L. D., Goodstein, J., & Gamble, L. G. (2009). A practical guide to job analysis. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Probst, T. M., Graso, M., Estrada, A. X., & Greer, S. (2013). Consideration of future safety consequences: A new predictor of employee safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 55, 124–134.
Ramsey, J. R. (1985). Ergonomic factors in task analysis for consumer product safety. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 7, 113–123.
Rozenfeld, O., Sacks, R., & Rosenfeld, Y. (2009). CHASTE—construction hazard analysis with spatial and temporal exposure. Construction Management and Economics, 27(7), 625–638.
Rozenfeld, O., Sacks, R., Rosenfeld, Y., & Baum, H. (2010). Construction job safety analysis. Safety Science, 48, 491–498.
Rundmo, T. (1996). Associations between risk perception and safety. Safety Science, 24, 197–209.
Rundmo, T., & Hale, A. R. (2003). Managers attitudes towards safety and accidents prevention. Safety Science, 41, 557–574.
Salgado, J. E. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30–43.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274.
Scroggins, W. A., Thomas, S. L., & Morris, J. A. (2009). Psychological testing in personnel selection, part III: The resurgence of personality testing. Public Personnel Management, 38(1), 67–77.
Simonet, S., & Wilde, G. J. S. (1997). Risk: Perception, acceptance and homeostasis. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(3), 235–252.
Smith, M. J., Cohen, H. H., Cohen, A., & Cleveland, R. J. (1978). Characteristics of successful safety programs. Journal of Safety Research, 10, 5–15.
Thompson, D. E., & Thompson, T. A. (1982). Court standards for job analysis in test validation. Personnel Psychology, 35, 865–874.
Visser, E., Pijl, Y. J., Stolk, R. P., Neeleman, J., & Rosmalen, J. G. M. (2007). Accident proneness, does it exist? A review and meta-analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 556–564.
Walker, A. (2013). Outcomes associated with breach and fulfillment of the psychological contract of safety. Journal of Safety Research, 47, 31–37.
Walker, A., & Hutton, D. H. (2006). The application of the psychological contract to workplace safety. Journal of Safety Research, 37, 433–441.
Wallace, J. C., & Vodanovich, S. J. (2003). Workplace safety performance: Conscientiousness, cognitive failure and their interaction. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8(4), 316–327.
Wilde, G. J. S., Robertson, L. S., & Pless, I. B. (2002). For and against: Does risk homoeostasis theory have implications for road safety. British Medical Journal, 324, 1149–1152.
Wilson, M. (2012). The handbook of work analysis: Methods, systems, applications and science of work measurement in organizations. New York: Routledge.
Wood, R., & Payne, T. (1998). Competency-based recruitment and selection. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burt, C.D.B. (2015). The Influences of Recruitment Processes and Selection Predictors on New Employee Safety. In: New Employee Safety. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18684-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18684-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18683-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18684-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)