Skip to main content

Conceptualising and Connecting Francophone Perspectives on Learning Through and for Work

  • Chapter

Part of the Professional and Practice-based Learning book series (PPBL,volume 12)

Abstract

This chapter offers an overview of the field of Francophone research on learning through work and is intended as a platform for presenting a delineation of this field. More specifically, the chapter presents a range of research traditions that have secured important places within the French-speaking research community, as illustrated in the chapters collected in the book. This overview aims at explaining the disciplinary background underlying these traditions and identifying key premises and concepts and specific research and training methods that have emerged in that particular context. The chapter also attempts to illuminate the specific conceptions of learning these traditions are built on and have contributed to promote. To achieve that outcome, three research traditions are described, in relation to their historical and cultural backgrounds, key ideas and methodological focuses. The first of these three traditions comprises what is referred to as Francophone ergonomics and the epistemology of the so-called work analysis. The historical and disciplinary origins of emergence of the Francophone tradition of ergonomics are presented, along with its central concepts, contributions to methods and applications in the field of vocational and professional training. Second, a focus is placed on the tradition of language use in relation to work, training and learning. These issues have acquired considerable visibility within Francophone research and have developed into a specific research tradition. An overview of the main research topics that have emerged within this tradition and key contributions to vocational and professional training issues is presented below. The third tradition is that referring to learning in connection with specific organisational contexts. Here, the social dimensions of learning are foregrounded and contributions from Francophone researchers are illustrated, and their alignment with other research traditions, and particularly those widely disseminated in the Anglophone world. The final section of the chapter draws together a range of ideas which have emerged beyond and across these specific research traditions, and that can be seen as having played an influencing role on the ways questions related with learning through and for work have been addressed in the Francophone world.

Keywords

  • Vocational Training
  • Work Activity
  • Professional Practice
  • Work Analysis
  • Research Tradition

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18669-6_2
  • Chapter length: 30 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-18669-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Amalberti, R., de Montmollin, M., & Theureau, J. (Eds.). (1991). Modèles en analyse du travail. Bruxelles: Mardaga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou, E., & Chiva, R. (2007). The social complexity of organizational learning: The dynamics of learning and organizing. Management Learning, 38(3), 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailly, M.-C., Durand, M., Goudeaux, A., Horcik, Z., & Poizat, G. (2014). Analyse du travail et formation: une technologie innovante. Education Permanente, n°HS-6, 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2006). Constituting the workplace curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2014). Mediating learning at work: Personal mediations of social and brute facts. In C. Harteis, A. Rausch, & J. Seifried (Eds.), Discourses on professional learning: On the boundary between learning and working (pp. 75–93). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1979). Aux sources de l’expérience. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisel, R. S., Messersmith, A. S., & Kelley, K. M. (2012). Supervisor-subordinate communication hierarchical mum effect meets organizational learning. Journal of Business Communication, 49(2), 128–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzeix, A., & Fraenkel, B. (Eds.). (2001). Langage et Travail, communication, cognition, action. Paris: CNRS Éditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, E., Allegra, J., & Mornata, C. (2015). Transmission and individuation in the workplace. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutet, J. (Ed.). (1995). Paroles au travail. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutet, J. (2001). La part langagière du travail: bilan et évolution. Langage et Societe, 98, 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutet, J. (2008). La vie verbale au travail: des manufactures aux centres d’appel. Toulouse: Editions Octarès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronckart, J.-P., Bulea, E., & Fristalon, I. (2004). Les conditions d’émergence de l’agir dans le langage. Cahiers de linguistique française, 26, 345–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brougère, G. (2015). Learning by participating: A theoretical configuration applied to French cooperative day care centres. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummans, B. H. J. M., Cooren, F., Robichaud, D., & Taylor, J. R. (2014). Approaches in research on the communicative constitution of organizations. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Sage Handbook of organizational communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnay, N. (Ed.). (2011). Transmission, mémoire et reconnaissance. Fribourg: Presses Universitaires de Fribourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnay, N., & Klein, A. (Eds.). (2009). Figures contemporaines de la transmission. Namur: Presses Universitaires de Namur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D., et al. (1994). The Relationship between researcher and researched: Ethics, advocacy and empowerment. In D. Graddol, J. Maybin, & B. Steirer (Eds.), Researching language and literacy in social context (pp. 18–25). London: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaliès, S., Ria, L., Trohel, J., & Durand, M. (2004). Knowledge construction and articulation of courses of action by preservice teachers and cooperating teachers during post-lesson interviews. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 765–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaliès, S., Bertone, S., Flavier, E., & Durand, M. (2008). Effects of collaborative mentoring on the articulation of training and classroom situations: A case study in the French school system. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 550–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallier, D. (Ed.). (1991). Savoir faire et pouvoir transmettre. Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K., & Holquist, M. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2005). Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization Science, 12(2), 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clot, Y. (1999). La fonction psychologique du travail. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clot, Y. (2005). L’autoconfrontation croisée en analyse du travail: l’apport de la théorie bakhtinienne du dialogue. In L. Filliettaz & J.-P. Bronckart (Eds.), L’analyse des actions et des discours en situation de travail. Concepts, méthodes et applications (pp. 37–55). Louvain-la-neuve: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clot, Y. (2009). Clinic of activity: The dialogue as instrument. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 286–302). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clot, Y., & Faïta, D. (2000). Genres et styles en analyse du travail: Concepts et méthodes. Travailler, 4, 7–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clot, Y., & Kostulski, K. (2011). Intervening for transforming: The horizon of action in the clinic of activity. Theory & Psychology, 21, 681–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clot, Y., Faïta, D., Fernandez, D., & Scheller, L. (2001). Entretiens en autoconfrontation croisée: une méthode en clinique de l’activité. Education Permanente, 146, 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniellou, F. (Ed.). (1996). L’Ergonomie en quête de ses principes. Toulouse: Octarès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniellou, F. (2005). The French-speaking ergonomists’ approach to work activity: Cross influences of field intervention and conceptual models. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6, 409–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Keyser, V. (1991). Work analysis in French language ergonomics: Origins and current research trends. Ergonomics, 34, 653–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Keyser, V. (1992). Why field studies. In M. Helander & M. Nagamachi (Eds.), Design for manufacturability: A systems approach to concurrent engineering and ergonomics (pp. 305–316). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Montmollin, M. (1967). Les systèmes Hommes-Machines: Introduction à l’ergonomie. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Montmollin, M. (1974). L’analyse du travail : préalable à la formation. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Montmollin, M. (1981). Le taylorisme à visage humain. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Montmollin, M. (1984). Actualité du taylorisme. In M. de Montmollin & O. Pastré (Eds.), Le taylorisme (pp. 13–32). Paris: La découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Montmollin, M. (1991). Analysis and models of operators’ activities in complex natural life environments. In J. Rasmussen, H. B. Andersen, & N. O. Bernsen (Eds.), Human-computer interaction (pp. 95–112). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejours, C. (2010). Le facteur humain. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delannoy, C. (1997). La motivation. Désir de savoir, désir d’apprendre. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbos, G., & Jorion, P. (1984). La transmission des savoirs. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic. The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolbeau, M. (2012). La mémoire du métier. Maréchal-ferrant : un passé retrouvé. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, M. (2008). Un programme de recherche technologique en formation des adultes. Education & Didactique, 2, 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, M. (2011). Self-constructed activity, work analysis, and occupational training: An approach to learning objects for adults. In P. Jarvis & M. Watts (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook on learning (pp. 37–45). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, M. (2013). Human activity, social practice and lifelong education: An introduction. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 32, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, M., & Poizat, G. (2015). An activity-centred approach to work analysis and the design of vocational training situations. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer, B. (2004). Organizational learning the ‘third way’. Management Learning, 35(4), 419–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (2004). Origins: A brief intellectual and technological history of the emergence of multimodal discourse analysis. In P. Levine & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 196–207). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falzon, P. (Ed.). (2013). Ergonomie constructive. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faverge, J.-M. (1954). Méthodes statistiques en psychologie appliquée. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filliettaz, L. (2006). Asymétrie et prises de rôles. Le cas des réclamations dans les interactions de service. In M. Laforest & D. Vincent (Eds.), Les interactions asymétriques (pp. 89–112). Québec: Editions Nota bene.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filliettaz, L. (2008). Compétences professionnelles et compétences langagières en situation de risque : La régulation langagière d’un « événement » en milieu industriel. Langage et Societe, 125, 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filliettaz, L. (2012). Affording learning environments in workplace contexts: An interactional and multimodal perspective. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 32, 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filliettaz, L., Durand, I., & Trébert, D. (2015). Learning through verbal interactions in the workplace: The role and place of guidance in vocational education and training. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, B. (2001). La résistible ascension de l’écrit au travail. In A. Borzeix & B. Fraenkel (Eds.), Langage et travail. Communication, cognition, action (pp. 113–142). Paris: CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Odella, F. (1998). Toward a social understanding of How people learn in organizations: The notion of situated curriculum. Management Learning, 29(3), 273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosjean, M., & Lacoste, M. (1999). Communication et intelligence collective: le travail à l’hôpital. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosjean, M., & Mondada, L. (Eds.). (2004). La négociation au travail. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusenmeyer, C., & Trognon, A. (1997). Les mécanismes coopératifs en jeu dans les communications de travail: un cadre méthodologique. Le Travail humain, 60(1), 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guérin, F., Laville, A., Daniellou, F., Duraffourg, J., & Kerguelen, A. (2007). Understanding and transforming work. The practice of ergonomics. Lyon: Anact Network Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, C. (2010). Video in qualitative research. Analysing social interaction in everyday life. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horcik, Z., & Durand, M. (2011). L’ergonomie de la formation par simulation: une démarche pilote de conception en formation d’infirmiers anesthésistes. Activités, 8, 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horcik, Z., Savoldelli, G., Poizat, G., & Durand, M. (2014). A phenomenological approach to novice nurse anesthetists’ experience during simulation-based training sessions. Simulation in Healthcare, 9, 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1984). Vers la compétence de communication. Paris: Hatier-Credif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. Style in language, 350, 377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaës, R. (2011). Désir de former, formation par le groupe et transmission des savoirs. In R. Kaës & C. Desvignes (Eds.), Le travail psychique de la formation (pp. 1–35). Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C., & Traverso, V. (Eds.). (2008). Les interactions en site commercial. Lyon: ENS Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloetzer, L., Clot, Y., & Quillerou-Grivot, E. (2015). Stimulating dialogue at work: The activity clinic approach to learning and development. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostulski, K. (2011). Development of activity through reflection: The case of the public prosecutor’s lapsus linguae. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24, 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunégel, P. (2011). Les maîtres d’apprentissage. Analyse des pratiques tutorales en situation de travail. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacoste, M. (2001). Peut-on travailler sans communiquer ? In A. Borzeix & B. Fraenkel (Eds.), Langage et travail (pp. 21–53). Paris: CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laforest, M., & Vincent, D. (Eds.). (2006). Les interactions asymétriques. Québec: Editions Nota bene.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laville A., Teiger C., & Duraffourg J. (1972). Conséquences du travail répétitif sous cadence sur la santé des travailleurs et les accidents. Rapport final, no 29, Collection du Laboratoire de Physiologie du Travail et d’Ergonomie du Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplat, J., & Hoc, J.-M. (1983). Tâche et activité dans l’analyse psychologique des situations. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 3, 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorino, P. (2015). Learning as transforming collective activity through dialogical inquiries. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorino, P., Tricard, B., & Clot, Y. (2011). Research methods for non-representational approaches to organizational complexity: The dialogical mediated inquiry. Organization Studies, 32, 769–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matte, F., & Cooren, F. (2015). Learning as dialogue: An ‘on-the-go’ approach to dealing with organizational tensions. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayen, P. (2000). Interactions tutorales au travail et négociations formatives: Formes et dispositifs de la professionnalisation. Recherche et formation, 35, 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayen, P. (2002). Le rôle des autres dans le développement de l’expérience. Education permanente, 151, 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayen, P. (2012). Les situations professionnelles: un point de vue de didactique professionnelle. Phronesis, 1, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayen, P. (2015). Vocational didactics: Work, learning and conceptualization. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, B. (1960). Adaptation du travail à l’homme. Rapport général sur la Conférence internationale de Zurich (2–6 mars 1959), projet no 6/07 E. Paris: O.E.C.E.-Organisation Européenne de Coopération Économique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollo, V., & Falzon, P. (2004). Auto- and allo-confrontation as tools for reflective activities. Applied Ergonomics, 35, 531–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2005). L’ordre interactionnel et l’ordre institutionnel comme des accomplissements pratiques des membres dans le temps. Médias et culture, 2, 85–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2006). La compétence comme dimension située et contingente, localement évaluée par les participants. Swiss Journal of Applied Linguistics, 84, 83–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourlhon-Dallies, F. (2008). Enseigner une langue à des fins professionnelles. Paris: Didier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murrell, K. F. H. (Ed.). (1959). Adaptation du travail à l’homme. Recherches américaines et européennes sur les conditions du travail dans l’industrie. Paris: Organisation Européenne de Coopération Economique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nizet, J., Van Dam, D., & Dejardin, M. (2009). Les limites de la transmission familiales chez les viticulteurs bio alsaciens. In N. Burnay & A. Klein (Eds.), Figures contemporaines de la transmission (pp. 347–358). Namur: Presses Universitaires de Namur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oddone, I., Re, A., & Briante, G. (2008). Esperienza operaia, coscienza di classe e psicologia del lavoro. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ombredane, A., & Faverge, J.-M. (1955). L’analyse du travail. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouellet, S., & Vézina, N. (2015). Activity analysis and workplace training: An ergonomic perspective. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastré, P. (2007). La didactique professionnelle: origines, fondements, perspectives. Travail et Apprentissages, 1, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastré, P. (2011). La didactique professionnelle. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastré, P., Mayen, P., & Vergnaud, G. (2006). La didactique professionnelle. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 154, 145–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavard, B. (1994). Systèmes coopératifs: de la modélisation à la conception. Toulouse: Octarès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pène, S., Borzeix, A., & Fraenkel, B. (Eds.). (2001). Le langage dans les organisations. Une nouvelle donne. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsky, L. (1992). Concevoir pour l’action et la coopération. Berne: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsky, L., & Theureau, J. (1987). L’étude du cours d’action: Analyse du travail et conception ergonomique. Paris: CNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poizat, G. (2015). Learning through interaction with technological objects: From the individuality of the technical object to human individuation. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poizat, G., & Durand, M. (2014). Un programme de recherche en ergonomie de formation: Illustration par le cas des techniciens en radiologie médicale. Actes du 49ème congrès international de la Société d’Ergonomie de Langue Française, La Rochelle, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poizat, G., Salini, D., & Durand, M. (2013). Approche énactive de l’activité humaine, simplexité, et conception de formations professionnelles. Education Sciences & Society, 4, 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies: une approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabardel, P. (2005). Instrument, activité et développement du pouvoir d’agir. In P. Lorino & R. Teulier (Eds.), Entre connaissance et organisation : l’activité collective (pp. 251–265). Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabardel, P., & Béguin, P. (2005). Instrument mediated activity: From subject development to anthropocentric design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6, 429–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabardel, P., & Pastré, P. (Eds.). (2005). Modèles du sujet pour la conception: dialectiques, activités, développement. Toulouse: Octarès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, F., & Wainrib, S. (2006). La subjectivation. Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samurçay, R., & Pastré, P. (1995). La conceptualisation des situations de travail dans la formation des compétences. Éducation Permanente, 123, 13–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samurçay, R., & Pastré, P. (Eds.). (2004). Recherches en didactique professionnelle. Toulouse: Octarès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savoyant, A. (1995). Guidage de l’activité et développement des compétences dans une entreprise d’insertion. Education permanente, 123, 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Y. (Ed.). (1998). Reconnaissances du travail. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1965). Administrative behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teiger, C., & Lacomblez, M. (2013). (Se) former pour transformer le travail. Laval: Presses de l’Université de Laval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theureau, J. (2004a). Le cours d’action: Méthode élémentaire. Toulouse: Octarès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theureau, J. (2004b). L’hypothèse de la cognition (ou action) située et la tradition d’analyse du travail de l’ergonomie de langue française. Activités, 1, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theureau, J. (2010). Les entretiens d’autoconfrontation et de remise en situation par les traces matérielles et le programme de recherche « cours d’action ». Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances, 4, 287–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, T. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin: The dialogical principle (Theory & history of literature). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veillard, L. (2015). University-corporate partnerships for designing workplace curriculum: Alternance training course in tertiary education. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal-Gomel, C., & Samurçay, R. (2002). Qualitative analyses of accidents and incidents to identify competencies. The electrical systems maintenance case. Safety Science, 40, 479–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Cranach, M., Kalbermatten, U., Indermühle, K., & Gugler, B. (1982). Goal directed action. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, A. (1983). Ergonomic or anthropotechnology: a limited or wide approach to working conditions in technology transfer. In Communication at the first international conference on ergonomics in developing countries, Lulea, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, A. (1985). Quand voyagent les usines. Essai d’anthropologie. Paris: Syros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, A. (1995a). Situated cognition and action: Implication for ergonomics work analysis and anthropotechnology. Ergonomics, 38, 1542–1583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, A. (1995b). The irruption of new technologies: a new challenge for ergonomics and anthropotechnology. Journal of Human Ergology, 24, 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, A. (1997). Anthropotechnologie. Vers un monde industriel polycentrique. Toulouse: Octarès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarifian, P. (2001). Objectif compétence. Paris: Editions Liaisons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Filliettaz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Filliettaz, L., Billett, S., Bourgeois, E., Durand, M., Poizat, G. (2015). Conceptualising and Connecting Francophone Perspectives on Learning Through and for Work. In: Filliettaz, L., Billett, S. (eds) Francophone Perspectives of Learning Through Work. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18669-6_2

Download citation