Skip to main content
  • 1150 Accesses

Abstract

Do consumers induce ethical consumption or companies seeking credibility for sales? This issue is discussed using assessments of the consumers’ behaviour and experiences with life cycle management of firms considered leaders in corporate social responsibility. Consumers state high preference for the ethical consumption but do not reveal it in purchases given product prices. This gap is often explained by the inconsistent consumers’ behaviour and deficient purchasing conditions, but supplies do not allow for sound assessments of functional qualities and ethical attributes compounded in products. Credible suppliers are highly rewarded with price markups and cost savings because can accrue a market share at low cost, save costs in supply chain and deliver value-adding products. A model on the consumers’ and suppliers’ deliberations between the functional qualities and ethical attributes, given prices, shows that the additional consumer demands have little positive influence on the ethical consumption compared to the innovating suppliers. Fostering sustainable innovations contributes more to ethical consumption than moralising about consumers’ behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berg, A. (2011). No roadmaps but tools: Analysing pioneering national programs for sustainable production and consumption. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34, 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2010). The myth of the ethical consumer (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuat Firat, A., & Dholakia, N. (2006). Theoretical and philosophical implications of postmodern debates: Some challenges to modern marketing. Marketing Theory, 6(2), 123–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halme, M., Jasch, C., & Scharp, M. (2004). Sustainable home services. Toward household services that enhance, ecological, social and economic sustainability. Ecological Economics, 51, 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen, E., & Pantzar, M. (1997). Towards sustainable consumption: Two new perspectives. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20, 409–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, M. (2009). Prosperity for all, consumer activism in the era of globalisation (1st ed.). New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoevenagel, R., van Rijn, U., Steg, L., & de Wit, H. (1996). Milieurelevant consumentengedrag, Ontwikkeling conceptueel model (pp. 19–62). Rijswijk: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imkamp, H. (2000). The interest of consumers in ecological product information is growing – Evidence from two German surveys. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23, 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2000). No logo (1st ed.). London: Flamingo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krozer, Y. (2004). Social demands in the life-cycle management. Greener Management International, 45, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krozer, Y. (2008). Life cycle costing for innovations in product chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 310–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. J. (1966a). A New approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. J. (1966b). Change and innovation in technology of consumption. American Economic Review, 56(1/2), 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litter, J. (2009). Radical consumption, shopping for change in contemporary culture (1st ed.). Berhshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazar, N., & Zhong, C.-B. (2010). Do green products make us better people. Psychological Science, 21, 494–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A., & Opal, C. (2005). Fair trade, market driven ethical consumption (1st ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Household behaviour and the environment. Paris: Reviewing the Evidence.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). Greening household behaviour. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/greening-household-behaviour_9789264214651-en. Visited 20-10-2014.

  • Osbaldiston, R., & Schott, J. P. (2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science, meta-analysis of pro-environmental behavior experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44, 257–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, K., & Mont, O. (2010). The role of formal and informal forces in shaping consumption and implications for sustainable society: Part II. Sustainability, 2, 2573–2592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, L. (2001). In dirty chains? Purchasing and greener manufacturing. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3–4), 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, C. A., & Montiel, I. (2005). When are corporate environmental policies a form of greenwashing? Business & Society, 44(4), 377–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. ((1962) 1964). Economic philosophy (1st ed.). Suffolk: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin, M. ((1971) 2011). Stone age economics (1st Paperback ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassatelli, R. (2007). Consumer culture, history, theory, politics (1st ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G. (2009). The new economics of sustainable consumption (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1991). Organizations and market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (2006). Altruism in economic. American Economic Review, 83(2), 156–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statista. (2014). Marketing spend worldwide 2009–2020 in http://www.statista.com/statistics/282197/global-marketing-spending/.

  • Thøgersen, J., Jørgensen, A.-K., & Sandager, S. (2012). Consumer decision making regarding a “green” everyday product. Psychology & Marketing, 29(4), 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigg, A. B. (2001). Veblen, Bourdieu, and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Economic Issues, 35(1), 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (2013). The theory of the leisure class. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/833/833-h/833-h.htm. Visited, 23-8-2014.

  • Vringer, K., Vollebergh, H., van Soest, D., van der Heijden, E., & Dietz, F. (2013). Dilemma’s rond duurzame consumptive. Een onderzoek naar het draagvlak voor verduurzaming van consumptive. Bilthoven: Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimann, J. (1990). Umwelt-ökonomik, eine theorieorientierte Einführung. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krozer, Y. (2016). Ethical Consumers and Producers. In: Theory and Practices on Innovating for Sustainable Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18636-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics