Skip to main content

What Do Practitioners Vary in Using Scrum?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming (XP 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 212))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Background: Agile software development has become a popular way of developing software. Scrum is the most frequently used agile framework, but it is often reported to be adapted in practice. Objective: Thus, we aim to understand how Scrum is adapted in different contexts and what are the reasons for these changes. Method: Using a structured interview guideline, we interviewed ten German companies about their concrete usage of Scrum and analysed the results qualitatively. Results: All companies vary Scrum in some way. The least variations are in the Sprint length, events, team size and requirements engineering. Many users varied the roles, effort estimations and quality assurance. Conclusions: Many variations constitute a substantial deviation from Scrum as initially proposed. For some of these variations, there are good reasons. Sometimes, however, the variations are a result of a previous non-agile, hierarchical organisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barabino, G., Grechi, D., Tigano, D., Corona, E., Concas, G.: Agile methodologies in web programming: a survey. In: Cantone, G., Marchesi, M. (eds.) XP 2014. LNBIP, vol. 179, pp. 234–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Callanan, M.: Ken schwaber on scrum (2010). http://blog.mattcallanan.net/2010/02/ken-schwaber-on-scrum.html

  3. Diebold, P., Dahlem, M.: Agile practices in practice: a mapping study. In: Proc. 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2014). ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Diebold, P., Ostberg, J.-P., Wagner, S., Zendler, U.: Interview guidelines for “what do practitioners vary in using Scrum?”. doi:10.5281/zenodo.12856

  5. Dorairaj, S., Noble, J., Malik, P.: Understanding team dynamics in distributed agile software development. In: Wohlin, C. (ed.) XP 2012. LNBIP, vol. 111, pp. 47–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Fontana, R.M., Reinehr, S., Malucelli, A.: Maturing in agile: what is it about? In: Cantone, G., Marchesi, M. (eds.) XP 2014. LNBIP, vol. 179, pp. 94–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. VersionOne Inc. 8th annual state of agile survey (2013). http://stateofagile.versionone.com/

  8. Ionel, N.: Critical analysys of the Scrum project management methodology. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series 17(4), 435–441 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kniberg, H.: The unofficial Scrum checklist (2011). https://www.crisp.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Scrum-checklist.pdf

  10. Kniberg, H.: Scrum and XP from the trenches. Lulu.com (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kurapati, N., Manyam, V.S.C., Petersen, K.: Agile software development practice adoption survey. In: Wohlin, C. (ed.) XP 2012. LNBIP, vol. 111, pp. 16–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Moe, N.B., Dingsøyr, S.: Scrum and team effectiveness: theory and practice. In: Abrahamsson, P., Baskerville, R., Conboy, K., Fitzgerald, B., Morgan, L., Wang, X. (eds.) XP 2008. LNBIP, vol. 9, pp. 11–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Sutherland, J., Schwaber, K.: The Scrum guide: The definitive guide to Scrum: The rules of the game (2013). http://scrumguides.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Wagner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Diebold, P., Ostberg, JP., Wagner, S., Zendler, U. (2015). What Do Practitioners Vary in Using Scrum?. In: Lassenius, C., Dingsøyr, T., Paasivaara, M. (eds) Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. XP 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18611-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18612-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics