Abstract
In a broad sense, a social medium is an online interaction space. Most commonly known online interaction spaces are infrastructures that allow members to interact around one or more nexuses of interaction using one or more modes of interaction. Success or failure of an online interaction space depends on how effectively the nexuses and modes meet the needs of the intended community of users. nanoHUB.org is described as an online interaction space that was designed largely by considering how members of the intended community could satisfy the “needs of the one” through chosen nexuses and modes. Based on satisfying several acute needs of individuals, the nanoHUB online interaction space grew into a large community that is beginning to behave more as a social unit than as a group of individuals. The primary nexus of interaction, a simulation tool, was chosen as an active rather than passive nexus (i.e. consuming from the nexus creates new information in the process). The active nexus more easily facilitates the design of features where the social medium itself can consume from the nexus and produce novel information useful to its community of users. In effect, it can become more than an infrastructural platform. It can become a member of its own community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bostrom, R. P., Gupta, S., & Thomas, D. (2009). A meta-theory for understanding information systems within sociotechnical systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 17–48. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222260102.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row. ISBN 978-0-06-016253-5.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Reading, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Hunt, Martin, et al. PUQ: A code for non-intrusive uncertainty propagation in computer simulations. Computer Physics Communications (2015).
Kapadia, N. H., Fortes, J. A., & Lundstrom, M. (1997, July). The semiconductor simulation hub: A network-based microelectronics simulation laboratory. In University Government Industry Microelectronics Symposium (pp. 72–77). Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
Madhavan, K., Zentner, M., & Klimeck, G. (2013). Learning and research in the cloud. Nature Nanotechnology, 8, 786–789. doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.231.
Majchrzak, A., & Markus, M. L. (2013). Technological affordances and constraints in management information systems (MIS). In E. Kessler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McLennan, M., & Kennell, R. (2010). HUBzero: A platform for dissemination and collaboration in computational science and engineering. Computing in Science & Engineering, 12(2), 48–53. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2010.41.
Miller, C. C. (2010, October 30). Why Twitter’s C.E.O. demoted himself. New York Times. Retrieved May 29, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/technology/31ev.html?_r=0
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). 10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474. doi:10.1080/19416520802211644.
Snowden, C. (2006). Cstng a pwr4l spll: D evolshn f sms. In A. P. Kavoori & N. Arceneaux (Eds.), The cell phone reader: Essays in social transformation (pp. 107–124). New York: Peter Lang.
Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398–1408. doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0771.
Acknowledgments
Mark S. Lundstrom founded nanoHUB.org in 1998. In 2005, Michael McLennan created the Rappture Toolkit and Rick Kennell wrote the scalable middleware of HUBzero that, respectively, enable and power interactive nanoHUB simulations. The Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) manages nanoHUB.org and has been funded by various NSF Awards Nos. EEC-0228390, EEC-1227110, EEC-0228390, EEC-0634750, OCI-0438246, OCI-0832623 and OCI-0721680.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zentner, M.G. et al. (2015). In the Flow: Evolving from Utility Based Social Medium to Community Peer. In: Matei, S., Russell, M., Bertino, E. (eds) Transparency in Social Media. Computational Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18552-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18552-1_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18551-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18552-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)