Abstract
This contribution reports on ongoing research carried on by the authors on the role of Social Media Geographic Information in spatial planning, design, and decision-making. Explicit and Implicit Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) from social media platforms, namely Social Media Geographic Information (SMGI) resources, were used to explore novel methods and tools for analysis and knowledge construction. The results concern three main research streams carried on with the common feature of integrating social media and other volunteered and authoritative sources of information from Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDI). These findings demonstrated that the integration of SMGI with more traditional Authoritative Geographic Information (A-GI) may offer a high potential for eliciting pluralist knowledge for spatial planning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models (Vol. 4). Berlin: Springer.
Anselin, L., Bera, A. K., Florax, R., & Yoon, M. J. (1996). Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(1), 77–104.
Ball, M. (2010). What’s the distinction between crowdsourcing, volunteered geographic information and authoritative data? http://www.sensysmag.com/spatialsustain/whats-the-distinction-between-crowdsourcing-volunteered-geographic-information-and-authoritative-data.html. Accessed Jan 15, 2015.
Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., et al. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal-Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518.
Bruns, A. (2006). Towards produsage: Futures for user-led content production. In F. Sudweeks, H. Hrachovec & C. Ess, (Eds.), Cultural attitudes towards communication and technology 2006 (pp. 275–284). June 28–July 1, Tartu, Estonia.
Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism Management, 21(1), 97–116.
Campagna, M. (2014). The geographic turn in social media: opportunities for spatial planning and geodesign. In Computational science and its applications—ICCSA 2014 (pp. 598–610). Berlin: Springer.
Caverlee, J. (2010). A few thoughts on the computational perspective. In Presented during the specialist meeting on spatio-temporal constraints on social networks, December 2010. Santa Barbara: CA, USA.
Craglia, M., Ostermann, F., & Spinsanti, L. (2012). Digital earth from vision to practice: Making sense of citizen-generated content. International Journal of Digital Earth, 5(5), 398–416.
Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F., & Sui, D. Z. (2012). Researching volunteered geographic information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(3), 571–590. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.595657.
Ester, M., Kriegel, H. P., Sander, J., & Xu, X. (1996). A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Kdd (Vol. 96, pp. 226–231).
Fotheringham, S. A., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2003). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. New York: Wiley.
Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial data infrastructure in the world of web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, 24–32.
Goodchild, M. F., & Glennon, J. A. (2010). Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: A research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3(3), 231–241.
Haklay, M. (2013). Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge (pp. 105–122). Netherlands: Springer.
Krumm, J., Davies, N., & Narayanaswami, C. (2008). User-generated content. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(4), 10–11.
Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A. L., Brewer, D., & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Life in the network: The coming age of computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721.
Nogueras-Iso, J., Zarazaga-Soria, F. J., Lacasta, J., Béjar, R., & Muro-Medrano, P. R. (2004). Metadata standard interoperability: Application in the geographic information domain. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 28(6), 611–634.
Poser, K., & Dransch, D. (2010). Volunteered geographic information for disaster management with application to rapid flood damage estimation. Geomatica, 64(1), 89–98.
Roche, S., Nabian, N., Kloeckl, K., & Ratti, C. (2012). Are ‘smart cities’ smart enough? In Global geospatial conference 2012. German: Global Spatial Data Infrastructure Association.
Roche, S., Propeck-Zimmermann, E., & Mericskay, B. (2013). GeoWeb and crisis management: Issues and perspectives of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 78(1), 21–40.
Schaffers, H., Guzmán, J. G., Navarro, M., & Merz, C. (2010). Living labs for rural development: Results from the C@ R integrated project. Madrid, Spain: TRAGSA.
Stefanidis, A., Crooks, A., & Radzikowski, J. (2013). Harvesting ambient geospatial information from social media feeds. GeoJournal, 78(2), 319–338.
Sui, D., Elwood, S., & Goodchild, M. (2013). Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge. Springer.
Toppeta, D. (2010). The smart city vision: How innovation and ICT can build smart, “Liveable”, sustainable cities, the innovation knowledge foundation. http://www.inta-aivn.org/images/cc/Urbanism/background%20documents/Toppeta_Report_005_2010.pdf. Accessed Jan 21, 2015.
Van Raaij, W. (1986). Consumer research on tourism mental and behavioral constructs. Annals of Tourism Research, 13(1), 1–9.
Washburn, D., Sindhu, U. (2010). Helping CIOs understand “smart city” initiatives. Forrester Research, Inc. http://www.uwforum.org/upload/board/forrester_help_cios_smart_city.pdf.Accessed Apr 20, 2015.
Zook, M., Graham, M., Shelton, T., & Gorman, S. (2010). Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: A case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Medical and Health Policy, 2(2), 7–33.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editors for the valuable comments on the early version of this chapter. The work presented in this chapter was developed by the authors within the research project “Efficacia ed efficienza della governance paesaggistica e territoriale in Sardegna: il ruolo della VAS e delle IDT” [Efficacy and efficiency of landscape and environmental management in Sardinia: the role of SEA and of SDI] CUP: J81J11001420007 funded by the Autonomous Region of Sardinia under the Regional Law no. 7/2007 “Promozione della ricerca scientifica e dell’innovazione tecnologica in Sardegna”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Campagna, M., Floris, R., Massa, P., Girsheva, A., Ivanov, K. (2015). The Role of Social Media Geographic Information (SMGI) in Spatial Planning. In: Geertman, S., Ferreira, Jr., J., Goodspeed, R., Stillwell, J. (eds) Planning Support Systems and Smart Cities. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18368-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18368-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18367-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18368-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)