Sentiment and Factual Transitions in Online Medical Forums

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9091)

Abstract

This work studies sentiment and factual transitions on an online medical forum where users correspond in English. We work with discussions dedicated to reproductive technologies, an emotionally-charged issue. In several learning problems, we demonstrate that multi-class sentiment classification significantly improves when messages are represented by affective terms combined with sentiment and factual transition information (paired t-test, P=0.0011).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anand, P., Walker, M., Abbott, R., Fox Tree, J.E., Bowmani, R., Minor, M.: Cats rule and dogs drool!: classifying stance in online debate. In: The 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis, ACL-HLT 2011, pp. 1–9 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blunsom, P., Cohn, T.: Discriminative word alignments with conditional random fields. In: Proceedings of COLING/ACL 2006, pp. 65–72 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bobicev, V., Sokolova, M., Jafer, Y., Schramm, D.: Learning sentiments from tweets with personal health information. In: Kosseim, L., Inkpen, D. (eds.) Canadian AI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7310, pp. 37–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chew, C., Eysenbach, G.: Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak. PLoS One (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chmiel, A., Sienkiewicz, J., Thelwall, M., Paltoglou, G., Buckley, K., Kappas, A., Holyst, J.: Collective Emotions Online and their Influence on Community Life. PLoS One (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coulson, N.: Receiving social support online: an analysis of a computer-mediated support group for individuals living with irritable bowel syndrome. CyberPsychology and Behavior 8(6), 580–584 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Culotta, A.: Lightweight methods to estimate influenza rates and alcohol sales volume from Twitter messages. Language Resources and Evaluation 47, 217–238 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goeuriot, L., Na, J., Kyaing, W., Khoo, C., Chang, Y., Theng, Y., Kim, J.: Sentiment lexicons for health-related opinion mining. In: The 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium, pp. 219–225 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hassan, A., Abu-Jbara, A., Radev, D.: Detecting subgroups in online discussions by modeling positive and negative relations among participants. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 59–70 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, S., Bak, J., Jo, Y., Oh, A.: Do you feel what i feel? social aspects of emotions in twitter conversations. In: Proceedings of ICWSM, pp. 495–498 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paul, M., Dredze, M.: You are what you tweet: analyzing twitter for public health. In: International Conference on WSM (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Qiu, B., Zhao, K., Mitra, P., Wu, D., Caragea, C., Yen, J., Greer, G., Portier, K.: Get online support, feel better-sentiment analysis and dynamics in an online cancer survivor community. In: Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), pp. 274–281 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sokolova, M., Bobicev, V.: What sentiments can be found in medical forums?. In: Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, pp. 633–639 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., Cardie, C.: Annotating Expressions of Opinions and Emotions in Language. Language Resources and Evaluation 39(2–3), 165–210 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zafarani, R., Cole, W.D., Liu, H.: Sentiment propagation in social networks: a case study in livejournal. In: Chai, S.-K., Salerno, J.J., Mabry, P.L. (eds.) SBP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6007, pp. 413–420. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria Bobicev
    • 1
  • Marina Sokolova
    • 2
    • 3
  • Michael Oakes
    • 4
  1. 1.Technical University of MoldovaChisinauMoldova
  2. 2.Institute for Big Data AnalyticsHalifaxCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of Medicine and Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  4. 4.Research Group in Computational LinguisticsUniversity of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK

Personalised recommendations