Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Crowdsourcing and the Evolution of a Business Ecosystem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Crowdsourcing

Abstract

This chapter explores a specific implementation of ideation-oriented crowdsourcing. In the follow-up of previous studies, we consider that ideation crowdsourcing does not necessarily mobilize highly skilled technical competences, but rather the ability of individuals to generate new ideas. Typical applications of ideation or creative crowdsourcing are artistic design activities. One can thus wonder about the role of creative crowdsourcing in the innovation process, upstream from the problem-solving steps. In this paper, we address this issue within a particular context: the evolution of an ecosystem based on an ICT platform. This chapter relies on a case study: Parkeon, a company specialized in the development and manufacture of multi-space parking meters, ran two crowdsourcing competitions in parallel, designed to uncover new ideas for services based on the use of multi-space meters. The case study highlights the convergence between certain conditions for the success of crowdsourcing and the factors contributing to the development of a BE: openness and modularity. Furthermore, it accentuates the role of users, who become the providers of new service concepts, and confirms the central role of the company leader for the development of the BE. Last, we discuss the not-invented-here (NIH) syndrome that can be encountered when crowdsourcing is implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.innocentive.com/about-innocentive/facts-stats.

  2. 2.

    Project with a total budget of 2.2 M Euros for the period 2011–2014, co-financed by the European Union's 7th FPRD.

  3. 3.

    Some authors consider also the opposite situation, a strong attraction toward products and knowledge produce elsewhere, this also can have negative consequences for the firm (Menon and Pfeffer 2003).

References

  • Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 355–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 10, 123–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attour, A., & Ayerbe, C. (2012). Connaissances et innovation au sein des écosystèmes d’affaires. Le cas des services mobiles. Revue Française de Gestion, 221(2), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blohm, I., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2013). Crowdsourcing: how to benefit from (Too) many great ideas. MIS Quarterly Executive, 12(4), 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, D. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence, The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, D. (2012). A model for leveraging online communities. In A. Delwiche & J. Henderson (Eds.), The participatory cultures handbook (pp. 120–129). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burcharth, A., Knudsen, M., & Søndergaard, H. (2014). Neither invented nor shared here: The impact and management of attitudes for the adoption of open innovation practices. Technovation, 34(3), 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (1983). Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: An insight from a process study. Management Science, 29, 1349–1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger-Helmchen T., & Pénin J. (2011). Crowdsourcing: définition, enjeux, typologie, Management & Avenir, janvier-février, pp 254–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohendet, P., & Llerena, P. (1999). La conception de la firme comme processeur de connaissances. Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 88, 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estellés-Arolas, E., & González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F. (2012). Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information Science, 38, 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gueguen, G., & Torrès, O. (2004). La dynamique concurrentielle des écosystèmes d’affaires – Linux contre Microsoft. Revue Française de Gestion, 148, 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired, 14(6), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review Mars, 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the not-invented-here (NIH) syndrome: A look at performance, tenure and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management, 12, 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, G. (2012). Le concept d’écosystème d’affaires revisité. M@n@gement, 15(2), 208–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N., Pallot, M., & Schaffers, H. (2013). Special issue on smart cities and the future internet in Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani, K. R., & Jeppesen, L. B. (2007). Getting unusual suspects to solve R&D puzzles. Harvard Business Review, 85(5), 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Masson, P., Weil, B., & Hatchuel, A. (2010). Strategic management of innovation and design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenfle, S. (2005). L’innovation dans les services : les apports de la théorie de la conception. Économies et Sociétés, 39, 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, U., & Ernst, H. (2006). Attitudes to externally organising knowledge management tasks: A review, reconsideration and extension of the NIH syndrome. R&D Management, 36(4), 367–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, U., Holger, E., & Martin, H. (2010). Not-sold-here: How attitudes influence external knowledge exploitation. Organization Science, 21(5), 1054–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loilier, T., & Malherbe, M. (2012). Le développement des compétences écosystémiques: Le cas de l’ESA émergent des services mobiles sans contact. Revue Française de Gestion, 222, 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, T., & Pfeffer, J. (2003). Valuing internal vs. external knowledge: Explaining the preference for outsiders. Management Science, 49, 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. F. (2006). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. The Antitrust Bulletin, 51(1), 31–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (2004). Inter-firm collaboration, learning and networks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pénin, J., & Burger-Helmchen, T. (2012). Crowdsourcing d’activités inventives et frontières des organisations. Management International, 16, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitzig, M., Sorenson, O. (2010). Intra-organizational provincialism. Available from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1552059.

  • Schenk, E., & Guittard, C. (2011). Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices. Journal of Innovation Economics, 7(1), 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, E., & Guittard, C. (2012). Une typologie des pratiques de Crowdsourcing: l’externalisation vers la foule, au-delà du processus d’innovation. Management International, 16, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise formation. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oakes: Sage publication.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. BETA-CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

    Claude Guittard & Thierry Burger-Helmchen

  2. BETA-CNRS, National Institute of Applied Sciences, Strasbourg, France

    Eric Schenk

Authors
  1. Claude Guittard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric Schenk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thierry Burger-Helmchen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claude Guittard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Organización de Empresas, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Fernando J. Garrigos-Simon

  2. Departamento de Organización de Empresas, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Ignacio Gil-Pechuán

  3. Department of Business Administration, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Sofia Estelles-Miguel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guittard, C., Schenk, E., Burger-Helmchen, T. (2015). Crowdsourcing and the Evolution of a Business Ecosystem. In: Garrigos-Simon, F., Gil-Pechuán, I., Estelles-Miguel, S. (eds) Advances in Crowdsourcing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18341-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation