Skip to main content

Design of Tuned Mass Dampers via Harmony Search for Different Optimization Objectives of Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engineering and Applied Sciences Optimization

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 38))

Abstract

In this chapter, an optimization methodology for tuning of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) on seismic structures was presented for two different objectives such as reducing the displacement of first story and absolute acceleration of top story of the structure. A metaheuristic method; harmony search (HS) was employed for optimization according to the time history analyses of structure under several earthquake excitations. Harmony search inspires musical performances in order to find optimum design variables according to optimization objective. Step by step, the methodology of the optimization process is explained in the chapter. The method was applied to find an optimum TMD for a seven story shear building and the optimum results were compared for the two cases considering displacement objective and acceleration objective. According to the results, optimum TMDs for both objectives are effective on both displacements and accelerations. But for acceleration objective, a small benefit for accelerations can be seen although the optimum mass of TMD is very heavy according to displacement objective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Frahm H (1911) Device for damping of bodies. U.S. Patent No: 989,958

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ormondroyd J, Den Hartog JP (1928) The theory of dynamic vibration absorber. T. ASME 50:9–22

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miyamoto HK, Gilani ASJ, Gündoğdu YZG (2011) Innovative seismic retrofit of an iconic building with mass damper. Seventh national conference on earthquake engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, 30 May–3 June

    Google Scholar 

  4. Den Hartog JP (1947) Mechanical vibrations. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Warburton GB (1982) Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 10:381–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sadek F, Mohraz B, Taylor AW, Chung RM (1997) A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:617–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang CC (1999) Mass dampers and their optimal designs for building vibration control. Eng Struct 21:454–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leung AYT, Zhang H (2009) Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers. Eng Struct 31:715–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leung AYT, Zhang H, Cheng CC, Lee YY (2008) Particle swarm optimization of TMD by non-stationary base excitation during earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:1223–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hadi MNS, Arfiadi Y (1998) Optimum design of absorber for MDOF structures. J Struct Eng ASCE 124:1272–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marano GC, Greco R, Chiaia B (2010) A comparison between different optimization criteria for tuned mass dampers design. J Sound Vib 329:4880–4890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh MP, Singh S, Moreschi LM (2002) Tuned mass dampers for response control of torsional buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:749–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Desu NB, Deb SK, Dutta A (2006) Coupled tuned mass dampers for control of coupled vibrations in asymmetric buildings. Struct Control Health Monit 13:897–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pourzeynali S, Lavasani HH, Modarayi AH (2007) Active control of high rise building structures using fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms. Eng Struct 29:346–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Steinbuch R (2011) Bionic optimisation of the earthquake resistance of high buildings by tuned mass dampers. J Bionic Eng 8:335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM (2011) Estimating optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers using harmony search. Eng Struct 33:2716–2723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM (2013) Optimization of tuned mass damper with harmony search. In: Gandomi AH, Yang X-S, Alavi AH, Talatahari S (eds) Metaheuristic applications in structures and infrastructures. Elsevier, Chapter 14

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM (2013) Mass ratio factor for optimum tuned mass damper strategies. Int J Mech Sci 71:68–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nigdeli SM, Bekdaş G (2013) Optimum tuned mass damper design for preventing brittle fracture of RC buildings. Smart Struct Syst 12(2):137–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nigdeli SM and Bekdaş G (2014) Optimization of TMDs for different objectives. In: An international conference on engineering and applied sciences optimization, Kos Island, Greece, 4–6 June

    Google Scholar 

  21. Farshidianfar A, Soheili S (2013) Ant colony optimization of tuned mass dampers for earthquake oscillations of high-rise structures including soil-structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 51:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Farshidianfar A, Soheili S (2013) ABC optimization of TMD parameters for tall buildings with soil structure interaction. Interact Multiscale Mech 6:339–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Farshidianfar A, Soheili S (2013) Optimization of TMD parameters for earthquake vibrations of tall buildings including soil structure interaction. Int J Optim Civil Eng 3:409–429

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on neural networks. Perth, Nov 27–Dec 1, pp 1942–1948

    Google Scholar 

  25. Holland JH (1975) Adaptat Nat Artif Syst. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor MI

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search. Optimization and machine learning, Addison Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  27. Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV (2001) A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76:60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dorigo M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A (1996) The ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet B 26:29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee KS, Geem ZW (2005) A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:3902–3933

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee KS, Geem ZW, Lee SH, Bae KW (2005) The harmony search heuristic algorithm for discrete structural optimization. Eng Optim 37:663–684

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Geem ZW (2008) Novel derivative of harmony search algorithm for discrete design variables. Appl Math Comput 199:223–230

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang X-S (2008) Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Luniver Press, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  33. The MathWorks Inc (2010) MATLAB R2010a. Natick, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  34. Peer (2005) Pacific earthquake engineering resource center: NGA database. University of California, Berkeley. http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sinan Melih Nigdeli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nigdeli, S.M., Bekdaş, G. (2015). Design of Tuned Mass Dampers via Harmony Search for Different Optimization Objectives of Structures. In: Lagaros, N., Papadrakakis, M. (eds) Engineering and Applied Sciences Optimization. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18320-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18320-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18319-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18320-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics