Theories on Endometriosis

  • Sajal Gupta
  • Avi Harlev
  • Ashok Agarwal
  • Elizabeth Pandithurai
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Reproductive Biology book series (BRIEFSREPROBIO)

Abstract

There are several theories as to how endometriosis develops, but the most widely accepted one is Sampson’s theory. First hypothesized in 1927, Sampson’s theory [1] states that three elements are required to cause endometriosis: retrograde menstruation, the presence of viable cells within the retrograde menstruation, and the implantation of these viable endometrial cells, which continue to grow and form peritoneal lesions [1].

References

  1. 1.
    Sampson, J. A. (1927). Metastatic or embolic endometriosis, due to the menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the venous circulation. The American Journal of Pathology, 3(2): 93–110.143.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giudice, L. C., & Kao, L. C. (2004). Endometriosis. Lancet, 364(9447), 1789–1799.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Halme, J., Hammond, M. G., Hulka, J. F., Raj, S. G., & Talbert, L. M. (1984). Retrograde menstruation in healthy women and in patients with endometriosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 64(2), 151–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kruitwagen, R. F., Poels, L. G., Willemsen, W. N., de Ronde, I. J., Jap, P. H., & Rolland, R. (1991). Endometrial epithelial cells in peritoneal fluid during the early follicular phase. Fertility and Sterility, 55(2), 297–303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu, D. T., & Hitchcock, A. (1986). Endometriosis: Its association with retrograde menstruation, dysmenorrhoea and tubal pathology. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 93(8), 859–862.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    (1983). Retrograde menstruation. Lancet, 2(8340): 25–26.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vinatier, D., Orazi, G., Cosson, M., & Dufour, P. (2001). Theories of endometriosis. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 96(1), 21–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vigano, P., Parazzini, F., Somigliana, E., & Vercellini, P. (2004). Endometriosis: Epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 18(2), 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    El-Mahgoub, S., & Yaseen, S. (1980). A positive proof for the theory of coelomic metaplasia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 137(1), 137–140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suginami, H. (1991). A reappraisal of the coelomic metaplasia theory by reviewing endometriosis occurring in unusual sites and instances. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 165(1), 214–218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schrodt, G. R., Alcorn, M. O., & Ibanez, J. (1980). Endometriosis of the male urinary system: A case report. The Journal of Urology, 124(5), 722–723.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martin, J. D., Jr., & Hauck, A. E. (1985). Endometriosis in the male. The American Surgeon, 51(7), 426–430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dictor, M., Nelson, C. E., & Uvelius, B. (1988). Priapism in a patient with endometrioid prostatic carcinoma. A case report. Urologia Internationalis, 43(4), 245–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pinkert, T. C., Catlow, C. E., & Straus, R. (1979). Endometriosis of the urinary bladder in a man with prostatic carcinoma. Cancer, 43(4), 1562–1567.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Longo, L. D. (1979). Classic pages in obstetrics and gynecology. Aberrant portions of the mullerian duct found in an ovary: William Wood Russell Johns Hopkins Hospital Bulletin, vol. 10, pp. 8–10, 1899. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 134(2), 225–226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ueki, M. (1991). Histologic study of endometriosis and examination of lymphatic drainage in and from the uterus. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 165(1), 201–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cassina, P. C., Hauser, M., Kacl, G., Imthurn, B., Schroder, S., & Weder, W. (1997). Catamenial hemoptysis. Diagnosis with MRI. Chest, 111(5), 1447–1450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leyendecker, G., Wildt, L., & Mall, G. (2009). The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: Tissue injury and repair. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 280(4), 529–538.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quinn, M. J. (2011). Endometriosis: The consequence of uterine denervation-reinnervation. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 284(6), 1423–1429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maruyama, T., & Yoshimura, Y. (2012). Stem cell theory for the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Frontiers in Bioscience (Elite Edition), 4, 2854–2863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gargett, C. E., Schwab, K. E., Brosens, J. J., Puttemans, P., Benagiano, G., & Brosens, I. (2014). Potential role of endometrial stem/progenitor cells in the pathogenesis of early-onset endometriosis. Molecular Human Reproduction, 20(7), 591–598.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sajal Gupta
    • 1
  • Avi Harlev
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ashok Agarwal
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Pandithurai
    • 5
  1. 1.Assistant Professor, Lerner College of Medicine and Case Western Reserve University, American Center for Reproductive MedicineCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Professor, Lerner College of Medicine and Case Western Reserve University, American Center for Reproductive MedicineCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA
  3. 3.American Center for Reproductive MedicineClevelandUSA
  4. 4.Lecturer, Soroka University Medical Center, Fertility and IVF UnitBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael
  5. 5.American Center for Reproductive MedicineCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations