Skip to main content

Neohypoplasticity—Estimation of Small Strain Stiffness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Holistic Simulation of Geotechnical Installation Processes

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics ((LNACM,volume 77))

Abstract

Behaviour of soils under small cycles is examined in the triaxial apparatus and the results are used for the calibration of several constitutive relations. The small strain relation is not exactly linear and stiffness \( E_{ijkl}\) in \(\dot{\sigma _{ij}}= E_{ijkl}\dot{\varepsilon _{kl}}\) is not constant. The popular hypoplastic (HP) model describes the small strain behaviour using the intergranular strain (Niemunis, Herle, Mech Cohesive-Frictional Mater 2(4):279–299 1997). However, this idea with an additional strain has several shortcomings. A better approach is the paraelastic (PE) model (Niemunis et al, Acta Geotech 6(2):67–80 2011; Prada Sarmiento, Paraelastic description of small-strain soil behaivour 2012). In this study the paraelasticity has been used already while evaluating of the raw data from triaxial test results. Similarly a simplified high cycle accumulation (HCA) formula (Niemunis et al, Comput Geotech 32(4):245–263 2005) and a simple assumption of stress dependence of \( E_{ijkl}\) have been used to purify the measured test data. A general curve-fitting strategy for testing of different constitutive models is developed. Some shortcomings of PE and HCA could be observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is common to consider that the form of response-envelope is an ellipse, but in general it is not.

  2. 2.

    Some authors require also the convexity of response-envelopes, but the necessity of this condition is not proven.

References

  1. Espino, E.: Quasi-statische Untersuchungen zur Elastizität von Sand als Grundlage eines neuen hypoplastischen Stoffmodells. Master’s thesis, Institut für Boden- und Felsmechanik, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Mai (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gudehus, G.: A comparison of some constitutive laws for soils under radially symmetric loading and unloading. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Aachen, Aachen, 1979. Balkema

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hettler, A., Danne, St.: Strain response envelopes for low cycle loading pro-cesses. In: International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris, vol. 2, pp. 1491–1494 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lewin, P.I., Burland, J.B.: Stress-probe experiments on saturated normally consolidated clay. Géotechnique 20, 38–56 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Niemunis, A.: Extended hypoplastic models for soils. Politechnika Gdańska, 2003. Habilitation, Monografia 34

    Google Scholar 

  6. Niemunis, A., Herle, I.: Hypoplastic model for cohesionless soils with elastic strain range. Mech. Cohesive-Frictional Mater. 2(4), 279–299 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Niemunis, A., Prada-Sarmiento, L.F., Grandas-Tavera, C.E.: Paraelasticity. Acta Geotech. 6(2), 67–80 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Niemunis, A., Wichtmann, T., Triantafyllidis, T.: A high-cycle accumulation model for sand. Comput. Geotech. 32(4), 245–263 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prada Sarmiento, L.F.: Paraelastic description of small-strain soil behaivour. PhD thesis, IBF, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Nr. 173 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sachs, L.: Angewandte Statistik. Anwendung statistischer Methoden. Springer, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wichtmann, T.: Explicit accumulation model for non-cohesive soils under cyclic loading. PhD thesis, Ruhr-University Bochum, Heft 38 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the M. Sc. E. Espino Cedro for his careful experimental work and provision of interesting test data used in this paper. The authors acknowledge financial support of SP1, DFG FOR1136.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Loges .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loges, I., Niemunis, A. (2015). Neohypoplasticity—Estimation of Small Strain Stiffness. In: Triantafyllidis, T. (eds) Holistic Simulation of Geotechnical Installation Processes. Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics, vol 77. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18170-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18170-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18169-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18170-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics