Skip to main content

Business Succession in Greece

  • Chapter
  • 940 Accesses

Part of the book series: Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law ((GSCL,volume 5))

Abstract

As is usually the case when dealing with the relationship between two specific fields of law, addressing the issue of the reciprocal influence between company law and law of succession is of particular importance. This is all the more important under Greek law, considering the leading position that small and medium-sized enterprises hold in Greek economy. For the SMEs choosing the right successor and preparing the company for a transfer is just as important as an optimal transition in the field of company succession. This is because in a company the death of a partner can cause a number of issues. For example, the deceased’s share may pass to beneficiaries who do not subscribe to the company’s business plan and vision or who lack business experience. Equally, even if the remaining partners/shareholders wanted to purchase the deceased’s shares, they may not have sufficient funds to do so. The challenges arising from a partner’s death are proving to be capable of meaningfully impacting on the continuation of the company, leading often even to its dissolution, all the more so since the purposes of inheritance law (that is establishment of testamentary freedom, protection of testator’s family) are hardly reconcilable with the principle of company law to promote the interests of the company. This is most clearly discernible within companies dominated by the intuitu personae. This is why the Greek company legislator (S. 4072/2012) took the initiative to mitigate the consequences of the death of a partner on commercial partnerships. Henceforth, the death will not bring about the automatic dissolution of the commercial partnership but its continuation with the rest of the partners. The new legislative orientation is in accordance with the general principle of supporting any measures aiming at keeping the company operational and alive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Vervessos N (2009) From the trisection of the law of Société Anonyme (big, medium, listed) towards the distinction between listed and unlisted limited company by shares in 18th Annual Pan-Hellenic Conference of commercial law (eds) Trends and perspectives in law of Société Anonyme, Nomiki Bibliothiki, Athens, p 331 et seq.; Rokas N (2012) Commercial companies. 7th edn., Nomiki Bibliothiki, Athens, §26 n0 16, p 185.

  2. 2.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn., Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, §1, p 17.

  3. 3.

    Papantonioy N (1989) Law of succession. 5th edn., Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, §1, p 17.

  4. 4.

    Georgiades A (2013) Introduction to the Law of Succession. in Georgiades A (ed) Brief Interpretation of Civil Code, Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, n0 8.

  5. 5.

    Ibid., n0 9.

  6. 6.

    Ibid., n0 10.

  7. 7.

    Georgiades G (2013) The protection of the compulsory portion. Ant. N. Sakkoulas Publishers, Athens, §8 n0 8, p 75.

  8. 8.

    Georgiades G (2013) The protection of the compulsory portion. Ant. N. Sakkoulas, Publishers, Athens, §8 n0 31, p 81.

  9. 9.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn., Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, §32, p 492.

  10. 10.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn., Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, §32, p 480.

  11. 11.

    This provision is also applicable by analogy to the civil company with legal personality, the joint venture and the unpublished general partnership.

  12. 12.

    Rokas N (2012) Commercial companies. 7th edn., Nomiki Bibliothiki, Athens, §26 n0 17, p 187, §33 n0 3, p 361 and §42 n0 1, p 483. Contra, Antonopoulos V (2013) Law of the company limited by shares and of the limited liability company. 4th edn., Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, §31 n0 1, p 547.

  13. 13.

    Antonopoulos V (2013) Law of the company limited by shares and of the limited liability company. 4th edn., Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, §31, n0 7 et seq., p 550 and n0 14, et seq., p 552.

  14. 14.

    Giovannopoulos R (2012) Reversible decisions of general meetings. EpiskED, p 452.

  15. 15.

    Multi-Member First Instance Court of Athens 569/2007, (2008) EEmpD, p 76; Antonopoulos V (2013) Law of the company limited by shares and of the limited liability company. 4th edn., Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, §28 n0 117, p 463.

  16. 16.

    General partnerships, limited partnerships and silent partnerships are the three types of commercial personal companies recognized by Greek company law.

  17. 17.

    Capital companies are considered to be limited companies by shareholding, the Limited Liability Company and the brand new form of company, the Private Company.

  18. 18.

    The justification for moderating the impacts of this principle are based on the reasoning that provisions which reflect the power of the person, such as termination of the partnership due to the death of any partner, are no longer in line with the new business inclination for maintenance of the business.

  19. 19.

    Even if the surviving partners ignore the fact of death, see Giovannopoulos (2013) in Apostolos Georgiades (eds) Brief Interpretation of Civil Code, Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, articles 773–774, n0 3.

  20. 20.

    Kotsiris L (2013) Greek law on Partnerships and Corporations. 4th edn., Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 17; Katsas T (2013) Rights and obligations of the general and limited partner in case of unilateral notice to terminate partner participation and the partnership agreement in 22nd Annual Pan-Hellenic Conference of commercial law (eds) The new company law of the small and medium-sized enterprises, Nomiki Bibliothiki, Athens, p 248.

  21. 21.

    Rokas N (2012) Commercial companies. 7th edn., Nomiki Bibliothiki, Athens, §42 n0 1, p 483; Avgitidis D (2009) The dissolution of a company limited by shares, in Mihail-Theodoros Marinos (eds) Issues from the new law of société anomyme. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, p 476; Psihomanis S (2013) Commercial Companies’ Law. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 315.

  22. 22.

    Panagiotou P (2012) Agreements for the Continuance of the Personal Company Despite the Death of the Partner and the Legal Rights of the Successor in Greek Company Law. EJLR, p 490 et seq.

  23. 23.

    See advisory opinion of the State Legal Service 633/2004, DEE 2005/493; Court of Appeal of Piraeus 312/2002, DEE 2002/711; Antonopoulos V (2012) Partnerships’ law. 4th edn. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, §26 n0 28, p 232; Georgakopoulos L (1965) Companies’ Law, Volume I, Partnerships, n0 131, p 345; Panagiotou P (2013) Revision on the Law of Personal Commercial Partnerships. Nomiki Bibliothiki, Athens, p 202 and 203.

  24. 24.

    Rokas N (2012) Commercial companies. 7th edn., Nomiki Bibliothiki, Athens, §13 n0 10, p 95; Antonopoulos V (2012) Partnerships’ law. 4th edn. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, §20 n0 14, 119.

  25. 25.

    Georgiades A (2007) Law of obligations, Volume ΙΙ. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, n0 83, p 748.

  26. 26.

    Rokas N (2012) Commercial companies. 7th edn., Nomiki Bibliothiki, Athens, §50 n0 2, p 560; Antonopoulos V (2013) Law of the company limited by shares and of the limited liability company. 4th edn., Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki,§ 39 n0 6, p 605.

  27. 27.

    The statutory clause prohibiting the transfer by succession of shares, which, as mentioned above, is null and void according should not be confused with the statutory clause providing for a right of first refusal of the other partners. This is, in essence, the right that gives its holder/co-partner the option to buy the shares transferred by succession (thus belonging to the heirs), according to specified terms, before the owner of them/heir is entitled to enter into a transaction with a third party in case of a partner’s death. These clauses are completely valid and of significant importance to the living partners as they render the maintenance of the ad personam character possible in limited liability companies, even after the partner’s death (continuation of the company only between the partners with the exclusion of the heirs). The articles of association can also provide that the company shall have the right to nominate a partner or a third party who will acquire the transferable shares at a full price to be determined by the court, unless the parties themselves agree on such a price or, if the articles of association provide for the manner in which such a price has to be calculated. In this respect, the articles of association may also foresee a preemption right towards the living partners, which constitutes a privilege extended to select partners of the company that will give them the right to purchase the additional shares in the company before anyone else has the opportunity.

  28. 28.

    An issue is raised concerning the validity of the agreement in the company contract for the continuance of the company with specific heirs (in a community, or with one or several). The question concerns whether the identification of the heir in the partnership agreement has the characteristic of a hereditary contract and runs contrary to the provision of article 368 GCC, which forbids such a contractual agreement resulting for the succession of a person who lives with either the same or a third person, either for the whole succession or for a percentage of it. Nevertheless, according to prevailing opinion, such a provision does not constitute a hereditary contract. The agreement in the company contract that the company will continue to operate amongst living partners and designated heirs, such as the heirs by testamentary succession, heirs by intestate succession or and those heirs which are appointed, will not be contrary to Article 368 GCC. This is for the following reasons, (a) the specific provision in the company contract refers to definite property assets, namely the company participation and not the whole or a percentage of the inheritance of the living and (b) the contract by which a person promises to the covenantee certain benefits which are to be disbursed at the time of death of the pledger has an onerous cause and not a gratuitous cause, since an exchange is submitted for the dereliction of the self-same hereditary share of the deceased partner.

  29. 29.

    Rokas N (2012) Commercial companies. 7th edn., Nomiki Bibliothiki, Athens, p 149; Rokas N (2010) The planned reform of the general partnership law. EfAD, p 867 et seq.; Psihomanis S (2013) Commercial Companies’ Law. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 102; Alexandridou E (2012) Law of Commercial Companies-Partnerships. Nomiki Bibliothiki, p 159.

  30. 30.

    See the advisory opinion of the State Legal Service 633/2004, DEE 2005/493; Court of Appeal of Thessaloniki, 599/2007, Arm. 61/1521; Georgiades G (2013) The protection of the compulsory portion. Ant. N. Sakkoulas, Publishers, Athens, §32, n0 5, 369; Rokas N (2012) Commercial companies. 7th edn., Nomiki Bibliothiki, Athens, p 149; Antonopoulos V (2013) Law of the company limited by shares and of the limited liability company. 4th edn., Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, §20 n0 29, 126 and §26 n0 30, 232; Psihomanis S (2013) Commercial Companies’ Law. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, 100–101; Giovannopoulos (2013) in Apostolos Georgiades (eds) Brief Interpretation of Civil Code, Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, articles 773–774; Georgiades A (2007) Law of obligations, Volume ΙΙ. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, n0 83, n0 83 748; Liakopoulos Ain Georgiades/Stathopoulos (ed) Commentary of Civil Code, articles 773–774, n0 13. See contra, Georgakopoulos L (1965) Companies’ Law, Volume I, Partnerships, n0 131, 349; Zepos P (1965) Law of obligations, Volume II. 2nd edn., 509–510; Skouras A in Georgiades/Stathopoulos (ed) Commentary of Civil Code, article 778, n0 9; Panagiotou P (2011) The continuation of the partnership despite the partner’s death and the legal status of the heir, DEE, 284 et seq.

  31. 31.

    Antapassis A (1994) in Evaggelos Perakis (eds) The law of the Limited Liability Company, Nomiki Bibliothiki, Athens, article 29, 44.

  32. 32.

    The same rule applies for the unlisted companies as well. Consequently, in case of there being more than one heir, a community is formed between them whereby each of the heirs becomes a co-owner of the share on a pro rata basis. In case of there being more than one share, there will be as many communities as the shares, given that Greek law refuses to acknowledge the communities of group thing or the communities of rights.

  33. 33.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn., Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, §5 n0 3, p 38 and § 22 n0 10, p 317.

  34. 34.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn., Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, §22 n0 37 et seq, p 326 et seq.

  35. 35.

    Court of Cassation 1089/1993, DEN = Deltio Ergatikis Nomothesias (Labor Legislation Bulletin), 1994/447.

  36. 36.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, §53 n0 1 et seq, p 1042 et seq.; Papantonioy N (1989) Law of succession. 5th edn., Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, §26, p 118.

  37. 37.

    Court of Cassation 1193/2012, HrID 2013/118, with comments by Ladogianni, Court of Cassation 103/2010 HrID 2010/696, with comments by Koumoutzis, Court of Cassation, 1171/2003, EllDik 2003/465; Papantonioy N (1989) Law of succession. 5th edn. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, §27, p 158; Balis G (1965) Law of succession. 5th edn., N. Tzaka & S. Delagrammatika, Athens, §231.

  38. 38.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, §83, n0 1; Filios P. in Georgiades/Stathopoulos (ed) Commentary of Civil Code, article 1809, n0 25.

  39. 39.

    For an overall review of the institution of condition as a kind of last will, see Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, §60 n0 1 et seq., p 1172 et seq.; Psoyni N (2011) Law of Succession. 2nd edn. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 200–201; As for examples of condition met in Greek case law, see Court of Cassation 1812/2008 and Court of Appeal of Athens 1710/2008.

  40. 40.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, §62 n0 2 et seq, p 1196 et seq.; Filios P (2011) Law of Succession. 8th edn. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, §128; Papantonioy N (1989) Law of succession. 5th edn. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, §10, p 53; Balis G (1965) Law of succession. 5th edn. N. Tzaka & S. Delagrammatika, Athens, §13.

  41. 41.

    Papantonioy N (1989) Law of succession. 5th edn., Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, p 108; Psoyni N (2011) Law of Succession. 2nd edn. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 400.

  42. 42.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, p 480.

  43. 43.

    Ibid., 493.

  44. 44.

    Georgiades G (2013) The protection of the compulsory portion. Ant. N. Sakkoulas, Publishers, Athens, §8 n0 8 et seq., p 75 et seq.

  45. 45.

    Georgiades G (2013) The protection of the compulsory portion. Ant. N. Sakkoulas, Publishers, Athens, §32 n0 9 et seq., p 370 et seq.

  46. 46.

    Ibid., §32 n0 16, p 373.

  47. 47.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, p 542–543, 489.

  48. 48.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, p 584.

  49. 49.

    Georgiades G (2013) The protection of the compulsory portion. Ant. N. Sakkoulas, Publishers, Athens, §19 n0 1 et seq., p 211 et seq.

  50. 50.

    Court of Cassation, Decision n0 1017/2009, Court of Cassation, Decision n0 1578/2007.

  51. 51.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, p 533; Papantonioy N (1989) Law of succession. 5th edn., Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens §114, p 423; Stathopoulos M, Introduction to articles 1825–1845, in Georgiades/Stathopoulos (ed) Commentary of Civil Code.

  52. 52.

    Georgiades G (2013) The protection of the compulsory portion. Ant. N. Sakkoulas, Publishers, Athens, §10 n0 27 et seq., p 105 et seq.

  53. 53.

    Karampatzos A (2011) The renunciation of the reserved portion. Ant. N. Sakkoulas Publishers, Athens, p 112 et seq.

  54. 54.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, p 535.

  55. 55.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn. Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, p 536–537; Georgiades G (2013) The protection of the compulsory portion. Ant. N. Sakkoulas, Publishers, Athens, §10 n0 23, p 104.

  56. 56.

    Ladogiannis G (2013) in Apostolos Georgiades (eds) Brief Interpretation of Civil Code, Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, article 1509, n0 10.

  57. 57.

    Spyridakis I (2006) Family law. Ant. N. Sakkoulas, Publishers, p 561–562; Liapis, D (2011) The offerings of parents to their children and the criteria of article 1509 CC. A contribution to the distinction between parental distribution of property and gift. NoV, 31–32.

  58. 58.

    Georgiades A Introduction to articles 1825–1845, in Georgiades/Stathopoulos (ed) Commentary of Civil Code, article 1509, n09.

  59. 59.

    Court of Cassation 491/2009, NoV 2009/1702, Court of Cassation 518/2006, HrID 2006/606.

  60. 60.

    Kounougeri-Manoledaki E (2012) Family law. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki Volume II, p 182; Koumantos G (1989) Family law. Sakkoulas, Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, p 166.

  61. 61.

    Georgiades A (2007) General Principles of Civil Law. Sakkoulas, Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, p 153,156.

  62. 62.

    Pelleni-Papageorgiou A (2007) Private Law Foundation. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 27.

  63. 63.

    Pelleni-Papageorgiou A (2007) Private Law Foundation. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 28.

  64. 64.

    For motives for the establishment of family foundations see Anthi Pelleni-Papageorgiou (2007) Private Law Foundation. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 136 et seq.

  65. 65.

    Mack, Die Stiftung als «moderne» Rechtsform für wirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Wist 1977, 541.

  66. 66.

    Pelleni-Papageorgiou A (2007) Private Law Foundation. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 131.

  67. 67.

    Helidonis A (2009) in Law on Legal Entities, Liber Amicorum Ph.Doris, Sakkoulas, Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas 2009, p 528.

  68. 68.

    Georgakopoulos L (1995) The business purpose of a charity foundation, DEE 2000, 460, 462, Pamboukis K (1990) Recommendations on Commercial Law. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki 1990, p 232.

  69. 69.

    Georgiades A (2007) General Principles of Civil Law. Sakkoulas, Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, p § 17 footnote 6; Perakis E (2013) General Part of Commercial Law. Nomiki Bibliothiki, § 42 no 20.

  70. 70.

    Pelleni-Papageorgiou A (2007) Private Law Foundation. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 124.

  71. 71.

    See statistics for 1950–2005 in Pelleni-Papageorgiou A (2007) Private Law Foundation. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 125.

  72. 72.

    For motives for the establishment of family foundations see Pelleni-Papageorgiou A (2007) Private Law Foundation. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 125.

  73. 73.

    Helidonis A (2009) in Law on Legal Entities, Liber Amicorum Ph. Doris, Sakkoulas, Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas 2009, p 528.

  74. 74.

    Pelleni-Papageorgiou A (2007) Private Law Foundation. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 129.

  75. 75.

    Article 116 Greek Civil Code. See also Dellios G (2013) in Apostolos Georgiades (eds) Brief Interpretation of Civil Code, Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, Article 166, n0 2.

  76. 76.

    Deligianni-Dimitrakou C (1998) Trust and fiduciary relationship. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 254, 262 263, who proposes the combination of a testamentary executor and a fideicommissum as the equivalent institution of “trust” in the Greek law.

  77. 77.

    Papadopoulou-Klamari D (2005) The executor of a will in Civil Code. Sakkoulas Publications 2005, pp 73–74, comparing a “trust” to the institution of a testamentary executor. See Also Supreme Court Dec. 1286/1977 Law Review 26, 1046, comparing “trust” to joint account or inalienable deposit.

  78. 78.

    Pelleni-Papageorgiou A (2007) Private Law Foundation. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 191.

  79. 79.

    Dellios G (2013) in Apostolos Georgiades (eds) Brief Interpretation of Civil Code, Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, Article 166, n0 2.

  80. 80.

    Details in Pelleni-Papageorgiou A (2007) Private Law Foundation. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 185 et seq.

  81. 81.

    Pelleni-Papageorgiou A (2007) Private Law Foundation. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 211.

  82. 82.

    Pournaras E, in Apostolos Georgiades (eds) Brief Interpretation of Civil Code, Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, Article 1923, no 1 et seq.

  83. 83.

    Georgiades A (2013) Law of Succession. 2nd edn., Law & Economy – P.N. Sakkoulas, Athens, p 1114 et seq.

  84. 84.

    Pelleni-Papageorgiou A (2007) Private Law Foundation. Sakkoulas Publications Athens-Thessaloniki, p 128.

  85. 85.

    Ibid., 128.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolaos Vervessos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vervessos, N., Stavrakidis, T. (2015). Business Succession in Greece. In: Kalss, S. (eds) Company Law and the Law of Succession. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18011-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics