Enhancing MIP Branching Decisions by Using the Sample Variance of Pseudo Costs
The selection of a good branching variable is crucial for small search trees in Mixed Integer Programming. Most modern solvers employ a strategy guided by history information, mainly the variable pseudo-costs, which are used to estimate the objective gain. At the beginning of the search, such information is usually collected via an expensive look-ahead strategy called strong branching until variables are considered reliable.
The reliability notion is thereby mostly based on fixed-number thresholds, which may lead to ineffective branching decisions on problems with highly varying objective gains.
We suggest two new notions of reliability motivated by mathematical statistics that take into account the sample variance of the past observations on each variable individually. The first method prioritizes additional strong branching look-aheads on variables whose pseudo-costs show a large variance by measuring the relative error of a pseudo-cost confidence interval. The second method performs a specialized version of a two-sample Student’s \(t\)-test for filtering branching candidates with a high probability to be better than the best history candidate.
Both methods were implemented in the MIP-solver SCIP and computational results on standard MIP test sets are presented.
KeywordsExpense Eter Ceria Univer
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.(COIN-OR branch-and-cut MIP solver). https://projects.coin-or.org/Cbc
- 2.(IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimizer). http://www-01.ibm.com/software/integration/optimization/cplex-optimizer/
- 3.(FICO Xpress-Optimizer). http://www.fico.com/en/Products/DMTools/xpress-overview/Pages/Xpress-Optimizer.aspx
- 4.(GUROBI Optimizer). http://www.gurobi.com/products/gurobi-optimizer/gurobi-overview
- 5.SCIP. Solving Constraint Integer Programs. (http://scip.zib.de/)
- 11.Applegate, D.L., Bixby, R.E., Chvátal, V., Cook, W.J.: Finding cuts in the TSP (A preliminary report). Technical Report 95–05, DIMACS (1995)Google Scholar
- 13.Ryan, D.M., Foster, B.A.: An integer programming approach to scheduling. In: Wren, A. (ed.) Computer Scheduling of Public Transport Urban Passenger Vehicle and Crew Scheduling, pp. 269–280. North Holland, Amsterdam (1981)Google Scholar
- 17.Berthold, T., Gamrath, G., Salvagnin, D.: Cloud branching. Presentation slides from Mixed Integer Programming Workshop at Ohio State University (2014). https://mip2014.engineering.osu.edu/sites/mip2014.engineering.osu.edu/files/uploads/Berthold_MIP2014_Cloud.pdf
- 18.Achterberg, T.: Constraint Integer Programming. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
- 24.Roussas, G.G.: A Course in Mathematical Statistics, Third Edition. Elsevier Science & Technology Books (2014)Google Scholar
- 25.SoPlex. An open source LP solver implementing the revised simplex algorithm. (http://soplex.zib.de/)
- 26.Danna, E.: Performance variability in mixed integer programming. Presentation slides from MIP workshop in New York City (2008). http://coral.ie.lehigh.edu/ jeff/mip-2008/program.pdf
- 27.Koch, T., Achterberg, T., Andersen, E., Bastert, O., Berthold, T., Bixby, R.E., Danna, E., Gamrath, G., Gleixner, A.M., Heinz, S., Lodi, A., Mittelmann, H., Ralphs, T., Salvagnin, D., Steffy, D.E., Wolter, K.: MIPLIB 2010. Mathematical Programming Computation 3, 103–163 (2011)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 28.Bixby, R.E., Ceria, S., McZeal, C.M., Savelsbergh, M.W.: An updated mixed integer programming library: MIPLIB 3.0. Optima 58, 12–15 (1998)Google Scholar