Abstract
This study investigates stance-taking strategies in a context of an examination of spoken English. The focus of the research is on the interaction between the candidates (advanced L2 speakers) and the examiners (L1 speakers of English). In particular, the study explores the use of epistemic adverbial markers such as ‘maybe’, ‘certainly’ and ‘surely’. These markers are used not only to express speakers’ position (certainty or uncertainty) towards a statement, but also to express speakers’ position towards other interlocutors (e.g. to manage interpersonal relationships or to downplay strong assertions). The study is based on the advanced subsection of the Trinity Lancaster Corpus of spoken L2 production which currently contains approximately 0.45M words based on four speaking tasks: one mostly monologic task and three highly interactive tasks. The study compares the expression of epistemic stance by both the candidates and examiners and explains the differences between speakers’ performance in terms of different speaker roles assumed by the candidates and examiners in three dialogic tasks. The study stresses the importance of looking at the contextual factors of speakers’ pragmatic choices and demonstrates that when studying L2 spoken production it is important to go beyond characterising the speakers as ‘native’ or ‘non-native’ speakers of a language. Whereas the fact of being a ‘native user’ or a ‘non-native user’ can indeed be part of the speaker role and speaker identity, other equally important factors arising from the context of the exchange may play a role in speakers’ stance-taking choices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aijmer, K. (2002). English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aijmer, K. (2004). Pragmatic markers in spoken interlanguage. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 3(1), 173–190.
Aijmer, K. (2011). Well I’m not sure I think… The use of well by non-native speakers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), 231–254.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Salsbury, T. (2004). The organization of turns in the disagreements of L2 learners: A longitudinal perspective. In D. Boxer & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Studying speaking to inform second language learning (pp. 199–227). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Baumgarten, N., & House, J. (2007). Speaker stances in native and non-native English conversation. In J. D. ten Thije & L. Zeevaert (Eds.), Receptive multilingualism (pp. 195–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Baumgarten, N., & House, J. (2010). ‘I think’ and ‘I don’t know’ in English as lingua franca and native English discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(5), 1184–1200.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., & Quirk, R. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London/New York: Longman.
Brezina, V. (2012). Epistemic markers in university advisory sessions: Towards a local grammar of epistemicity. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Brezina, V., & Meyerhoff, M. (2014). Significant or random?: A critical review of sociolinguistic generalisations based on large corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(1), 1–28.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buysse, L. (2012). ‘So’ as a multifunctional discourse marker in native and learner speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(13), 1764–1782.
Callies, M. (2013). Advancing the research agenda of interlanguage pragmatics: The role of learner corpora. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics 2013 (pp. 9–36). Dordrecht: Springer.
Coates, J. (1987). Epistemic modality and spoken discourse. Transactions of the Philological Society, 85(1), 110–131.
Coates, J. (1990). Modal meaning: The semantic–pragmatic interface. Journal of Semantics, 7(1), 53–63.
Fordyce, K. (2009). A comparative study of learner corpora of spoken and written discursive language: Focusing on the use of epistemic forms by Japanese EFL learners. Hiroshima Studies in Language and Language Education, 12, 135–150.
Fordyce, K. (2014). The differential effects of explicit and implicit instruction on EFL learners’ use of epistemic stance. Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 6–28.
Fuller, J. M. (2003). The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(1), 23–45.
Fung, L., & Carter, R. (2007). Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 410–439.
Holmes, J. (1988). Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 21–44.
Holmes, J. (1990). Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech. Language & Communication, 10(3), 185–205.
Hunston, S. (2007). Using a corpus to investigate stance quantitatively and qualitatively. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 27–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183–205.
Kärkkäinen, E. (2003). Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kärkkäinen, E. (2006). Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk, 26(6), 699–731.
Liao, S. (2009). Variation in the use of discourse markers by Chinese teaching assistants in the US. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(7), 1313–1328.
McEnery, T., & Kifle, N. A. (2002). Epistemic modality in argumentative essays of second-language writers. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 182–195). Harlow: Longman.
Mortensen, J. (2012). Subjectivity and intersubjectivity as aspects of epistemic stance marking. In N. Baumgarten, I. D. Bois, & J. House (Eds.), Subjectivity in language and in discourse (pp. 229–246). Bingley: Emerald.
Mukherjee, J. (2009). The grammar of conversation in advanced spoken learner English. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (pp. 203–230). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Müller, S. (2005). Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Precht, K. (2003). Stance moods in spoken English: Evidentiality and affect in British and American conversation. TEXT, 23(2), 239–258.
Romero-Trillo, J. (2002). The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(6), 769–784.
Rühlemann, C. (2011). Corpus-based pragmatics II: Quantitative studies. In W. Bublitz & N. R. Norrick (Eds.), Foundations of pragmatics (pp. 629–656). Berlin: Mouton DeGruyter.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., & Aijmer, K. (2007). The semantic field of modal certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trinity College London. (2009). Exam information: Graded examinations in spoken English (GESE).
Acknowledgments
The research presented in this chapter was supported by the ESRC Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science, ESRC grant reference ES/K002155/1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V. (2015). Does Speaker Role Affect the Choice of Epistemic Adverbials in L2 Speech? Evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus. In: Romero-Trillo, J. (eds) Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17947-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17948-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)