Abstract
This chapter focuses on descriptive and experimental studies of the sexual biology of two spider species, Leucauge mariana and Leucauge argyra . We examine general questions related to female effects on paternity by taking advantage of several unusual traits: direct female participation in forming copulatory plugs and physical clasping by the female rather than the male during copulation in both species; and derived traits in the genitalia of males and females and occasional female cannibalism of conspecific males by trapping the male’s genitalia in adhesive copulatory plugs in L. argyra. These derived traits, combined with other aspects of sexual interactions that are typical of spiders in general, such as complete, easy female avoidance of unwanted sexual advances of males, copulatory courtship by males, and imperfect male ability to remove copulatory plugs from the female’s genitalia, constitute a rich mixture from which clear lessons can be drawn. Post-copulatory sexual selection probably acts on male genitalia and their behavior in both species. Two derived male genitalic clasping and clamping devices L. argyra may be associated with the extremely aggressive female behavior. One genital structure in male L. mariana may have evolved under sexual selection by sperm competition to remove copulatory plugs from female genitalia . In contrast to expectations from theory based on male–female conflict, the female genitalia of L. argyra has a derived trait that selectively facilitates rather than impedes male genital clamping. In contrast to lock-and-key expectations, another prominent, derived female genital structure in L. argyra does not mesh with any male structure during copulation; it may instead function in sensing male genital movements . Additional non-genital male traits associated with copulation are also probably under post-copulatory sexual selection in both species. Experimental manipulations of male chelicerae and of possible female receptors of stimuli from the male chelicerae demonstrated that stimulation from secondary sexual modifications of the male chelicerae influences several female reproductive processes in L. mariana , including receptivity to remating , female interruption of copulation, and copulatory plug formation. Additionally, two male copulatory courtship behavioral patterns correlate with greater plug formation in L. mariana, and one pre-copulatory courtship behavioral pattern in males of L. argyra correlates with plug formation, suggesting additional possible male effects on post-copulatory female reproductive processes. Other male sexual behavior correlates with the timing of female emission of plug material that may affect a male’s chances of surviving the encounter. In sum, female Leucauge have powerful effects on whether copulation occurs, when it will end, whether a mating plug will be formed, and whether the male will survive the encounter. Several genital and non-genital male traits likely evolved under a mix of post-copulatory sexual selection (sperm competition and probably cryptic female choice [CFC]) to elicit favorable modulation of these female effects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aisenberg A (2009) Male performance and body size affect female re-mating occurrence in the orb web spider Leucauge mariana (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). Ethology 115:1127–1136
Aisenberg A, Barrantes G (2011) Sexual behavior, cannibalism and mating plugs as sticky traps in the orb weaver spider Leucauge argyra (Tetragnathidae). Naturwissenschaften 98:605–613
Aisenberg A, Eberhard WG (2009) Possible cryptic female choice in a spider: female cooperation in making a copulatory plug depends on male copulatory courtship. Behav Ecol 20:1236–1241
Aisenberg A, Barrantes G, Eberhard WG (2015) Hairy kisses: tactile cheliceral courtship affects female mating decisions in Leucauge mariana (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 69(2):313–323
Alayón G (1979) Procesos copulatorios de Leucauge regnyi Simon (Araneae: Tetragnathidae). Misc Zool Acad Ciencias Cuba 4:2–3
Alexander RD, Marshall DC, Cooley JR (1997) Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) Mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 4–31
Álvarez-Padilla F, Hormiga G (2011) Morphological and phylogenetic atlas of the orbweaving spider family Tetragnathidae (Araneae: Araneoidea). Zool J Linn Soc 162:713–879
Álvarez-Padilla F, Dimitrov D, Giribet G, Hormiga G (2009) Phylogenetic relationships of the spider family Tetragnathidae (Araneae, Araneoidea) based on morphological and DNA sequence data. Cladistics 25:109–146
Andrade MCB (1996) Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the Australian redback spider. Science 240:70–72
Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Barrantes G, Aisenberg A, Eberhard WG (2013) Functional aspects of genital differences in Leucauge argyra and L. mariana (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J Arachnol 41:59–69
Barrantes G, Sánchez-Quirós C, Aisenberg A, Leitch K, Eberhard WG (in press) Loss of cheliceral clasping in Leucauge sp. (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). Arachnology
Boorman E, Parker GA (1976) Sperm (ejaculate) competition in Drosophila melanogaster, and the reproductive value of female of remating to male in relation to female age and mating status. Ecol Entomol 1:145–155
Briceño RD, Eberhard WG (2009a) Experimental modifications imply a stimulatory function for male tsetse fly genitalia, supporting cryptic female choice theory. J Evol Biol 22:1516–1525
Briceño RD, Eberhard WG (2009b) Experimental demonstration of possible cryptic female choice on male tsetse fly genitalia. J Insect Physiol 55:989–996
Bristowe WS (1929) The mating habits of spiders, with special reference to the problems surrounding sex dimorphism. Proc Zool Soc 21:309–358
Castro TJ (1995) Estudio comparativo del comportamiento reproductor, en las arañas del género Leucauge (Araneae: Tetragnathidae), del Soconusco, Chiapas. Graduate Thesis, Universidad de Ciencias y Artes del Estado de Chiapas, México
Córdoba-Aguilar A (1999) Male copulatory sensory stimulation induces female ejection of rival sperm in a damselfly. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:779–784
Córdoba-Aguilar A (2002) Sensory trap as the mechanism of sexual selection in a damselfly genitalic trait (Insecta: Calopterygidae). Amer Nat 160:594–601
Drummond BA (1984) Multiple mating and sperm competition in the Lepidoptera. In: Smith RA (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 291–371
Eberhard WG (1991) Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in insects. Biol Rev 66(1):1–31
Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Eberhard WG (2001) Species-specific genitalic copulatory courtship in sepsid flies (Diptera, Sepsidae, Microsepsis) and theories of genitalic evolution. Evolution 55(1):93–102
Eberhard WG (2002) Physical restraint or stimulation? The function (s) of the modified front legs of male Archisepsis diversiformis (Diptera, Sepsidae). J Insect Behav 15(6):831–850
Eberhard WG (2011) Experiments with genitalia: a commentary. Trends Ecol Evol 26(1):17–21
Eberhard WG, Huber BA (1998a) Courtship, copulation and sperm transfer in Leucauge mariana (Araneae, Tetragnathidae) with implications for higher classification. J Arachnol 26:342–368
Eberhard WG, Huber BA (1998b) Possible links between embryology, lack of innervation, and the evolution of male genitalia in spiders. Bull British Arachnol Soc 11(2):73–80
Eberhard WG, Huber BA (2010) Spider Genitalia. In: Leonard J, Córdoba A (eds) The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals, pp 249–284
Eberhard WG, Guzmán-Gómez S, Catley KM (1993) Correlation between genitalic morphology and mating systems in spiders. J Linn Soc 50:197–209
Elgar MA, Schneider JM, Herberstein ME (2000) Female control of paternity in the sexually cannibalistic spider Argiope keyserlingi. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2439–2443
Fromhage L, Uhl G, Schneider JM (2003) Fitness consequences of sexual cannibalism in female Argiope bruennichi. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:60–64
Gomiendo M, Harcourt AH, Roldán ERS (1998) Sperm competition in mammals. In: Møller AP, Birkhead TR (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, London, pp 667–756
Huber BA (1995) The retrolateral tibial apophysis in spiders—shaped by sexual selection? Zool J Linn Soc 113:151–163
Huber BA (1998) Spider reproductive behaviour: a review of Gerhardt’s work from 1911–1933, with implications for sexual selection. Bull Brit Arachnol Soc 11:81–91
Huber BA (2005) Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases. Biol Rev 80:363–385
Knoflach B (1998) Mating in Theridion varians Hahn and related species (Araneae: Theridiidae). J Nat Hist 32:545–604
Kraus O (1984) Male spider genitalia: evolutionary changes in structure and function. Verh Naturwiss Ver Hamburg 27:373–382
Kuntner M, Gregoric M, Zhang S, Kralj-Fišer S, Li D (2012) Mating plugs in polyandrous giants: which sex produces them, when, how and why? PLoS ONE 7(7):e40939
Leonard J, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2010) The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Levi HW (1981) The American orb-weaver genera Dolichognatha and Tetragnatha North of Mexico (Araneae: Araneidae, Tetragnathinae). Bull Mus Comp Zool 149:271–318
Masumoto T (1993) The effect of the copulatory plug in the funnel-web spider, Agelena limbata (Araneae: Agelenidae). J Arachnol 21:55–59
Mattoni CI, Peretti AV (2004) The giant and complex genital plug of the asper group of Bothriurus (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae): morphology and comparison with other scorpion genital plugs. Zool Anz 243:75–84
Méndez V (2002) Comportamiento sexual y dinámica de población de Leucauge mariana (Araneae: Tetragnathidae). MSc thesis, Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica
Méndez, V., Eberhard WG (2014) Removal of genital plugs and insemination by males with normal and experimentally modified palps in Leucauge mariana (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J Arachnol 42(3):284–292
Schneider JM, Elgar MA (2001) Sexual cannibalism and sperm competition in the golden orb-web spider Nephila plumipes (Araneoidea): female and male perspectives. Behav Ecol 12:552–574
Scudder G (1971) Comparative morphology of insect genitalia. Ann Rev Entomol 16:379–406
Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Timmermeyer N, Gerlach T, Guempel C, Knoche J, Pfann JF, Schliessmann D, Michiels NK (2010) The function of copulatory plugs in Caenorhabditis remanei: hints for female benefits. Front Zool. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-7-28
Tuxen SL (1970) Taxonomist’s glossary of genitalia in insects. CON: S-H Service Agency, Darien
Uhl G, Nessler SH, Schneider JM (2010) Securing paternity in spiders? A review on occurrence and effects of mating plugs and male genital mutilation. Genetica 138:75–104
Watson PJ (1991) Multiple paternity as genetic bet-hedging in female sierra dome spiders, Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Anim Behav 41:343–360
Wigby S, Chapman T (2004) Sperm competition. Curr Biol 14:100–103
Acknowledgments
We thank Rosannette Quesada, Catalina Sánchez, Emilia Triana, and Vivian Méndez for providing access to unpublished data; Jairo Moya-Ramirez for photographs; Rafael Lucas Rodriguez and A.V. Peretti for useful suggestions on the manuscript; and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (AA, WE), Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación (AA), Programa de Desarrollo de Ciencias Básicas (AA), and the Universidad de Costa Rica (GB, WE) for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aisenberg, A., Barrantes, G., Eberhard, W.G. (2015). Post-copulatory Sexual Selection in Two Tropical Orb-weaving Leucauge Spiders. In: Peretti, A., Aisenberg, A. (eds) Cryptic Female Choice in Arthropods. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17894-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17894-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17893-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17894-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)