Female Choice in Social Insects

Chapter

Abstract

The mating biology of eusocial insects, being the ants, bees, wasps, and termites, is truly amazing as a number of reproductive traits have evolved in these species that are not or rarely found in other species, such as the absence of remating later in life, prolonged sperm storage, and extreme levels of queen fertility. Kin selection is recognized as a driving force shaping these insect societies and their reproductive biology, selecting for high relatedness among helpers, and limiting the number of fathers contributing to offspring. The study of the mating biology of social insects received remarkably little scientific attention, despite the fact that mating behavior can provide a mechanism through which high relatedness can be achieved. As a consequence, our current knowledge about the presence or absence of sexual selection including female choice remains poorly investigated. In this chapter, I provide a theoretical introduction to female choice in social insects, arguing that in the absence of female remating later in life and exceptional high demands for large numbers of viable sperm, queens should express male choice throughout all steps of the mating process. I then discuss some examples from the recent literature that provide empirical evidence for female choice (precopulatory and cryptic choice) and develop a number of questions and hypotheses that can be addressed in the future.

References

  1. Alford DV (1975) Bumblebees. Davis-Poynter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Allard D, Gobin B, Billen J (2007) Timing of sperm transfer in Diacamma pallidum. Physiol Entomol 32:382–387Google Scholar
  3. Armitage S, Boosma J, Baer B (2010) Diploid male production in a leaf-cutting ant. Ecol Entomol 35:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashe A, Oldroyd B (2002) Genetic determination of caste in harvester ants. Trends Ecol Evol 17:448–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson L, Adams ES (1997) The origins and relatedness of multiple reproductives in colonies of the termite Nasutitermes corniger. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 264:1131–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baer B (2003) Bumblebees as model organisms to study male sexual selection in social insects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:521–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baer B (2005) Sexual selection in Apis bees. Apidologie 36:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baer B (2011) The copulation biology of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 14:55–68Google Scholar
  9. Baer B (2014) Sexual selection in social insects. In: Shuker D, Simmons LW (eds) The evolution of insect mating systems. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P (1999) Experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite loads and fitness in a bumble-bee. Nature 397:151–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P (2001) Unexpected consequences of polyandry for parasitism and fitness in the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris. Evolution 55:1639–1643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P (2003) Bumblebee workers from different sire groups vary in susceptibility to parasite infection. Ecol Lett 6:106–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P (2005) Sperm influences female hibernation success, survival and fitness in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Proc R Soc B 272:319–323CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P, Hoeg JT, Boosma JJ (2003) Sperm length, sperm storage and mating system characteristics in bumblebees. Insect Soc 50:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Baer B, Armitage SAO, Boosma JJ (2006) Sperm storage induces an immunity cost in ants. Nature 441:872–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Baer B, Eubel H, Taylor NL, O’Toole N, Millar AH (2009). Insights into female sperm storage from the spermathecal fluid proteome of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Genome Biol 10: R67Google Scholar
  17. Beekman M, Van Stratum P (1998) Bumblebee sex ratios: Why do bumblebees produce so many males? Proc R Soc B 265:1535–1543CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Beye M, Hasselmann M, Fondrk MK, Page RE, Omholt SW (2003) The gene csd is the primary signal for sexual development in the honeybee and encodes an SR-type protein. Cell 114:419–429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Boomsma JJ (1996) Split sex ratios and queen-male conflict over sperm allocation. Proc R Soc B 263:697–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Boomsma JJ (2007) Kin selection versus sexual selection: why the ends do not meet. Curr Biol 17:R673–R683CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Boomsma JJ (2009) Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Phil Trans R Soc 364:3191–3207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Boomsma JJ, Ratnieks FLW (1996) Paternity in eusocial Hymenoptera. Philos T Roy Soc B 351:947–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Boomsma JJ, Baer B, Heinze J (2005) The evolution of male traits in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 50:395–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  25. Bresslau E (1905) Der Samenblasengang der Bienenkönigin. Zool Anz 29:299–325Google Scholar
  26. Brown MJF, Baer B (2005) The evolutionary significance of long copulation duration in bumblebees. Apidologie 36:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dade HA (1962) Anatomy and dissection of the honeybee. Bee Research Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Den Boer SPA, Boomsma JJ, Baer B (2009) Honey bee males and queens use glandular secretions to enhance sperm viability before and after storage. J Insect Physiol 55:538–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Den Boer SPA, Baer B, Boomsma JJ (2010) Seminal fluid mediates ejaculate competition in social insects. Science 327:1506–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Diehl-Fleig E (1995) Success of colony establishment by Acromyrmex striatus (Roger) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Soc Entomol Brasil 24:625–630Google Scholar
  31. Doums C, Cronin AL, Ruel C, Federici P, Haussy C, Tirard C, Monnin T (2013) Facultative use of thelytokous parthenogenesis for queen production in the polyandrous ant Cataglyphis cursor. J Evol Biol 26:1431–1444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Duvoisin N, Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P (1999) Sperm transfer and male competition in a bumblebee. Anim Behav 58:743–749CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  34. Fernandez-Marin H, Zimmerman JK, Wcislo WT (2004) Ecological traits and evolutionary sequence of nest establishment in fungus-growing ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Attini). Biol J Linn Soc 81:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Foster KR, Ratnieks FL (2000) Facultative worker policing in a wasp. Nature 407:692–693CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Fournier D, Estoup A, Orivel J, Foucaud J, Jourdan H, Le Breton J, Keller L (2005) Clonal reproduction by males and females in the little fire ant. Nature 435:1230–1234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gerloff CU, Ottmer BK, Schmid-Hempel P (2003) Effects of inbreeding on immune response and body size in a social insect, Bombus terrestris. Funct Ecol 17:582–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Greeff M, Schmid-Hempel P (2008) Sperm reduces female longevity and increases melanization of the spermatheca in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Insect. Soc. 55:313–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Haag-Liautard C, Vitikainen E, Keller L, Sundström L (2009) Fitness and the level of homozygosity in a social insect. J Evol Biol 22:134–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behavior I & II. J Theor Biol 7(I):1–16; (II): 17–32Google Scholar
  41. Hartke TR, Baer B (2011) The mating biology of termites: a comparative review. Anim Behav 82:927–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Heimpel GE, De Boer JG (2008) Sex determination in the Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 53:209–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Heinze J, Frohschammer S, Bernadou A (2013) Queen life-span and total reproductive success are positively associated in the ant Cardiocondyla cf. kagutsuchi. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1555–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hölldobler B, Bartz SH (1985) Sociobiology of reproduction in ants. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioural ecology and sociobiology. Gustav Fischer Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  45. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hughes WOH, Boomsma JJ (2005) Genetic diversity and disease resistance in leafcutting ant societies. Evolution 58:1251–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hughes WOH, Sumner S, Van-Borm S, Boomsma JJ (2003) Worker caste polymorphism has a genetic basis in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:9394–9397CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hughes WOH, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2008) Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320:1213–1216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Izzo AS, Tibbetts EA (2012) Spotting the top male: sexually selected signals in male Polistes dominulus wasps. Anim Behav 83:839–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jaffe R, Garcia-Gonzalez F, Den Boer SPA, Simmons LW, Baer B (2012) Patterns of paternity skew among polyandrous social insects: what can they tell us about the potential for sexual selection? Evolution 66:3778–3788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Janet C (1904) Anatomie du gaster de la Myrmica rubra. Georges Carré et C. Nuad, ParisGoogle Scholar
  52. Keller L, Passera L (1992) Mating system, optimal number of mating, and sperm transfer in the Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kellner K, Heinze J (2011) Mechanism of facultative parthenogenesis in the ant Platythyrea punctata. Evol Ecol 25:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Klenk M, Koeniger G, Koeniger N, Fasold H (2004) Proteins in spermathecal gland secretion and spermathecal fluid and the properties of a 29 kDa protein in queens of Apis mellifera. Apidologie 35:371–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Koeniger N, Koeniger G (1991) An evolutionary approach to mating behaviour and drone copulatory organs in Apis. Apidologie 22:581–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kronauer DJC (2009) Recent advances in army ant biology (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 12:51–65Google Scholar
  57. Kronauer DM, Boomsma JJ (2007) Do army ant queens re-mate later in life? Insect Soc 54:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Maleszka R (2008) Epigenetic integration of environmental and genomic signals in honey bees. Epigenetics 3:188–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Monnin T, Peeters C (1998) Monogyny and regulation of worker mating in the queenless ant Dinoponera quadriceps. Anim Behav 55:299–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Moritz RFA, Lattorff HMG, Neumann P, Kraus FB, Radloff SE, Hepburn HR (2005) Rare royal families in honeybees, Apis mellifera. Naturwissenschaften 92:488–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Oberstadt B, Heinze J (2003) Mating biology and population structure of the ant, Leptothorax gredleri. Insect Soc 50:340–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Oldroyd BP, Fewell JH (2007) Genetic diversity promotes homeostasis in insect colonies. Trends Ecol Evol 22:408–413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Oppelt A, Heinze J (2007) Dynamics of sperm transfer in the ant Leptothorax gredleri. Naturwissenschaften 94:781–786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Penick CA, Prager SS, Liebig J (2012) Juvenile hormone induces queen development in late-stage larvae of the ant Harpegnathos saltator. J Insect Physiol 58:1643–1649CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Poland V, Eubel H, King M, Solheim C, Millar AH, Baer B (2011) Stored sperm differs from ejaculated sperm by proteome alterations associated with energy metabolism in the honeybee Apis mellifera. Mol Ecol 20:2643–2654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Pollock GB, Cabrales A, Rissing SW, Binmore KG (2012) Suicidal punishment in the ant Acromyrmex versicolor. Evol Ecol Res 14:951–971Google Scholar
  67. Queller DC (2003) Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects. BMC Evol Biol 3:15CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Raignier A, Van Boven JKA (1955) Etude taxonomoque, biologique et biométrique des Dorylus du sous-genre Anomma (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Ann Mus R Congo Belg 2:1–359Google Scholar
  69. Ratnieks FLW, Foster KR, Wenseleers T (2006) Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol (Annual Reviews, Palo Alto)Google Scholar
  70. Reichardt AK, Wheeler DE (1996) Multiple mating in the ant Acromyrmex versicolor: a case of female control. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Robertson HG (1995) Sperm transfer in the ant Carebara vidua F. Smith (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insect Soc 42:411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rubenstein DR (2012) Family feuds: social competition and sexual conflict in complex societies. Phil Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 367:2304–2313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ruttner F (1956) The mating of the honey bee. Bee World 3:2–15Google Scholar
  74. Sauter A, Brown MJF, Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P (2001) Males of social insects can prevent queens from multiple mating. Proc R Soc B 268:1449–1454CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Schmid-Hempel P (1998) Parasites in social insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  76. Schmid-Hempel P, Crozier RH (1999) Polyandry versus polygyny versus parasites. Philos T Roy Soc B 354:507–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schoeters E, Billen J (2000) The importance of the spermathecal duct in bumblebees. J Insect Physiol 46:1303–1312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Snodgrass RE (1984) Anatomy of the honeybee. Comstock Publishing Associates, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  79. Sundström L (1994) Sex ratio bias, relatedness asymmetry and queen mating frequency in ants. Nature 367:266–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tarpy DR (2003) Genetic diversity within honeybee colonies prevents severe infections and promotes colony growth. Proc R Soc B 270:99–103CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191:249–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Tschinkel WR (1987a) Fire ant queen longevity and age: estimation by sperm depletion. Ann Entomol Soc Am 80:263–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tschinkel WR (1987b) Relationship between ovariole number and spermathecal sperm count in ant queens: a new allometry. Ann Entomol Soc Am 80:208–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tsuji K (1996) Queen-male conflict over sperm use in social insects. Trends Ecol Evol 11:490–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Weber NA (1972) Gardening ants: the attines. The American Philosophical Society, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  86. West SA, Pen I, Griffin AS (2002) Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296:72–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Wiernasz DC, Perroni CL, Cole BJ (2004) Polyandry and fitness in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Mol Ecol 13:1601–1606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  89. Wilson EO (2000) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  90. Winston ML (1991) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  91. Woyke J (1983) Dynamics of entry of spermatozoa into the spermatheca of instrumentally inseminated queen honey bees Apis mellifera. J Apic Res 22:150–154Google Scholar
  92. Yue C, Schroder M, Gisder S, Genersch E (2007) Vertical-transmission routes for deformed wing virus of honeybees (Apis mellifera). J Gen Virol 88:2329–2336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Integrative Bee Research (CIBER)The University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations