Abstract
The short- and long-term outcome of epilepsy surgery has been mostly assessed by observational studies because experimental designs in surgical patients are often unfeasible and have ethical implications. However, observational studies have methodological limitations, which include the retrospective design, the use of referral populations, the small sample size, the enrolment of patients at differing inception points, the use of differing inclusion criteria, differing definitions of prognostic predictors and outcome measures, the unmasked assessment of outcome, the short follow-up, the changing technologies and surgical procedures, and the inadequate statistical methods. These limitations are incorporated in systematic reviews of epilepsy surgery studies and cannot replace well-conducted prognostic studies. Key features of these studies should include representative populations at risk, well-defined inception cohorts, satisfactory and complete follow-up, prospective design, and standard definition of prognostic factors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, Eliasziw M, Effectiveness and Efficiency of Surgery for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Study Group. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:311–8.
Engel Jr J, McDermott MP, Wiebe S, Langfitt JT, Stern JM, Dewar S, Sperling M, Gardiner I, Erba G, Fried I, Jacobs M, Vinters HV, Mintzer S, Kieburtz K. Early surgical therapy for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy. JAMA. 2012;307:922–30.
National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference. Surgery for epilepsy. JAMA. 1990;264:729–33.
Schmidt D, Stavem K. Long-term seizure outcome of surgery versus no surgery for drug-resistant partial epilepsy: a review of controlled studies. Epilepsia. 2009;50:1301–9.
Tellez-Zenteno JF, Dhar R, Wiebe S. Long-term seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain. 2005;128:1188–98.
Sillanpaa M, Schmidt D. Natural history of treated childhood-onset epilepsy: prospective, long-term population-based study. Brain. 2006;129:617–24.
Shorvon SD, Goodridge DMG. Longitudinal cohort studies of the prognosis of epilepsy: contribution of the National General Practice Study of Epilepsy and other studies. Brain. 2013;136:3497–510.
Luciano A, Shorvon SD. Results of treatment changes in patients with apparently drug-resistant chronic epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2007;62:375–81.
Callaghan B, Schlesinger M, Rodemer W, Pollard J, Hesdorffer D, Hauser WA, French J. Remission and relapse in a drug-resistant epilepsy population followed prospectively. Epilepsia. 2011;52:619–26.
Neligan A, Bell GS, Sander JW, Shorvon SD. How refractory is refractory epilepsy? patterns of relapse and remission in people with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2011;96:225–30.
Engel Jr J, Van Ness PC, Rasmussen TB, Ojemann LM. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies outcome with respect to epileptic seizures. In: Engel Jr J, editor. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. 2nd ed. New York: Raven; 1993. p. 609–21.
Wieser HG, Blume WT, Fish D, Goldensohn E, Hufnagel A, King D, et al. ILAE commission report. Proposal for a new classification of outcome with respect to epileptic seizures following epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 2001;42:282–6.
Engel Jr J. Approaches to localization of the epileptogenic lesion. In: Engel Jr J, editor. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. New York: Raven; 1987. p. 75–96.
McIntosh AM, Wilson S, Berkovic SF. Seizure outcome after temporal lobectomy: current research practice and findings. Epilepsia. 2001;42:1288–307.
Tonini C, Beghi E, Berg AT, Bogliun G, Giordano L, Newton RW, Tetto A, Vitelli E, Vitezic D, Wiebe S. Predictors of epilepsy surgery outcome: a meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res. 2004;62:75–87.
Spencer S, Huh L. Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults and children. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:525–37.
Perry MS, Duchowny M. Surgical versus medical treatment for refractory epilepsy: outcomes beyond seizure control. Epilepsia. 2013;54:2060–70.
Hrabok M, Dykeman J, Sherman EMS, Wiebe S. An evidence-based checklist to assess neuropsychological outcomes of epilepsy surgery: how good is the evidence? Epilepsy Behav. 2013;29:443–8.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Gøtzsche PC, Pocock SJ, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e296.
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M, STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e297.
Engel Jr J, Wiebe S, French J, Sperling M, Williamson P, Spencer D, Gumnit R, Zahn C, Westbrook E, Enos B, Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; American Epilepsy Society; American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, in association with the American Epilepsy Society and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurology. 2003;60:538–47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beghi, E. (2015). Methodological Demands on Observational Studies of Outcomes After Epilepsy Surgery. In: Malmgren, K., Baxendale, S., Cross, J. (eds) Long-Term Outcomes of Epilepsy Surgery in Adults and Children. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17783-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17783-0_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17782-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17783-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)