Skip to main content

Methodological Demands on Observational Studies of Outcomes After Epilepsy Surgery

  • Chapter
Long-Term Outcomes of Epilepsy Surgery in Adults and Children

Abstract

The short- and long-term outcome of epilepsy surgery has been mostly assessed by observational studies because experimental designs in surgical patients are often unfeasible and have ethical implications. However, observational studies have methodological limitations, which include the retrospective design, the use of referral populations, the small sample size, the enrolment of patients at differing inception points, the use of differing inclusion criteria, differing definitions of prognostic predictors and outcome measures, the unmasked assessment of outcome, the short follow-up, the changing technologies and surgical procedures, and the inadequate statistical methods. These limitations are incorporated in systematic reviews of epilepsy surgery studies and cannot replace well-conducted prognostic studies. Key features of these studies should include representative populations at risk, well-defined inception cohorts, satisfactory and complete follow-up, prospective design, and standard definition of prognostic factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, Eliasziw M, Effectiveness and Efficiency of Surgery for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Study Group. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:311–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Engel Jr J, McDermott MP, Wiebe S, Langfitt JT, Stern JM, Dewar S, Sperling M, Gardiner I, Erba G, Fried I, Jacobs M, Vinters HV, Mintzer S, Kieburtz K. Early surgical therapy for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy. JAMA. 2012;307:922–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference. Surgery for epilepsy. JAMA. 1990;264:729–33.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidt D, Stavem K. Long-term seizure outcome of surgery versus no surgery for drug-resistant partial epilepsy: a review of controlled studies. Epilepsia. 2009;50:1301–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tellez-Zenteno JF, Dhar R, Wiebe S. Long-term seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain. 2005;128:1188–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sillanpaa M, Schmidt D. Natural history of treated childhood-onset epilepsy: prospective, long-term population-based study. Brain. 2006;129:617–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shorvon SD, Goodridge DMG. Longitudinal cohort studies of the prognosis of epilepsy: contribution of the National General Practice Study of Epilepsy and other studies. Brain. 2013;136:3497–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Luciano A, Shorvon SD. Results of treatment changes in patients with apparently drug-resistant chronic epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2007;62:375–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Callaghan B, Schlesinger M, Rodemer W, Pollard J, Hesdorffer D, Hauser WA, French J. Remission and relapse in a drug-resistant epilepsy population followed prospectively. Epilepsia. 2011;52:619–26.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Neligan A, Bell GS, Sander JW, Shorvon SD. How refractory is refractory epilepsy? patterns of relapse and remission in people with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2011;96:225–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engel Jr J, Van Ness PC, Rasmussen TB, Ojemann LM. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies outcome with respect to epileptic seizures. In: Engel Jr J, editor. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. 2nd ed. New York: Raven; 1993. p. 609–21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wieser HG, Blume WT, Fish D, Goldensohn E, Hufnagel A, King D, et al. ILAE commission report. Proposal for a new classification of outcome with respect to epileptic seizures following epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 2001;42:282–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Engel Jr J. Approaches to localization of the epileptogenic lesion. In: Engel Jr J, editor. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. New York: Raven; 1987. p. 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McIntosh AM, Wilson S, Berkovic SF. Seizure outcome after temporal lobectomy: current research practice and findings. Epilepsia. 2001;42:1288–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tonini C, Beghi E, Berg AT, Bogliun G, Giordano L, Newton RW, Tetto A, Vitelli E, Vitezic D, Wiebe S. Predictors of epilepsy surgery outcome: a meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res. 2004;62:75–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spencer S, Huh L. Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults and children. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:525–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perry MS, Duchowny M. Surgical versus medical treatment for refractory epilepsy: outcomes beyond seizure control. Epilepsia. 2013;54:2060–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hrabok M, Dykeman J, Sherman EMS, Wiebe S. An evidence-based checklist to assess neuropsychological outcomes of epilepsy surgery: how good is the evidence? Epilepsy Behav. 2013;29:443–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Gøtzsche PC, Pocock SJ, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M, STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e297.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Engel Jr J, Wiebe S, French J, Sperling M, Williamson P, Spencer D, Gumnit R, Zahn C, Westbrook E, Enos B, Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; American Epilepsy Society; American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, in association with the American Epilepsy Society and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurology. 2003;60:538–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ettore Beghi MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beghi, E. (2015). Methodological Demands on Observational Studies of Outcomes After Epilepsy Surgery. In: Malmgren, K., Baxendale, S., Cross, J. (eds) Long-Term Outcomes of Epilepsy Surgery in Adults and Children. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17783-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17783-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17782-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17783-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics