Advertisement

Sustainable High-Rise Buildings in the Netherlands

  • Wim ZeilerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The concept of vertical living and working has been hailed as a solution to facilitate fast growth and urbanization of cities worldwide (Drew et al. 2014). At the beginning of 2015, the global population was around 7.2 billion people (USCB 2015). In 2050, the human population will be probably more than 9 billion and 10.9 billion by the turn of the next century (United Nations 2013), 75 % of whom will be living in cities (Hargrave 2013). Tall buildings can address many of the environmental issues facing cities by providing high-density, efficient buildings that link to public transportation systems and offer the type of amenities demanded by tenants (Wood 2013). As city living takes center stage, urban building of the future have to foster sustainable qualities, essentially functioning as a living organism and engaging with the users within. Cities throughout the world are growing rapidly, creating unprecedented pressure on material and energy resources. Cities with their financial and administrative centers are a key asset to the countries’ national economy and to the cities itself. The local authorities want to assure the city’s continues dynamism given that its business requires ideal conditions in which to operate (Plank et al. 2002). To do so, the local authorities need to assure that the demand for office space can be met within the center of economical activities. In this context, tall office buildings are becoming increasingly necessary as a result of the efficient use that they make of the limited land available. Besides the focus on offices, more and more focus is also on mixed use of the tall buildings, where the offices are combined hotels, shops, and apartments. Some of the new tall buildings become almost a city on their own. The buildings need to help to optimize city-wide production, storage, and consumption of everything from food and energy to water (Hargrave 2013). As in large cities, almost three quarters of their energy consumption is in buildings; this will be one of the main concerns (Plank et al. 2002). The most intensive use of energy of state-of-the-art high-rise buildings usually results from the cooling (40 %) or heating (30 %) of space, while lifts use about 5 % of a tall building’s energy and lighting and electrical appliance can make up about 25 % (Plank et al. 2002). Careful building services design can minimize the need for heating and cooling throughout the year for example by applying seasonal thermal energy storage.

Keywords

Heat Pump Design Team Life Cycle Cost Green Roof Tall Building 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Active House (2013) www.activehouse.info
  2. Ali MM, Armstrong PJ (2006) Strategies for integrated design of sustainable tall buildings. AIA Report on University Research, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali MM, Armstrong PJ (2008) Overview of sustainable design factors in high-rise buildings. In: CTBUH 8th World Congress, Dubai, 3–5 March 2008Google Scholar
  4. Almefelt L (2005a) Balancing properties while synthesising a product concept—a method highlighting synergies. In: Proceedings ICED’05, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  5. Almefelt L (2005b) Requirements driven product innovation, methods and tools reflecting industrial needs. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, GöteborgGoogle Scholar
  6. Armour T, Armour S, Hargrave J, Revel T (2014) Cities alive, rethinking green infrastructure. Arup, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. ASHRAE (2011) Tall buildings. In: ASHRAE handbook—HVAC applications. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  8. Badke-Schaub P, Neumann A, Lauche K, Mohammed S (2007) Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration? CoDesign 3(1):5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bayazit N (2004) Investigating design: a review of forty years of design research. Des Issues 20(1):16–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beckett J (2012) A return from the wilderness. CIBSE J 3(11):22Google Scholar
  11. Beerda E (2008) High and clean atmosphere. Summer 2008Google Scholar
  12. Blessing LTM (1994) A process-based approach to computer supported engineering design. PhD thesis, Universiteit Twente, EnschedeGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunsgaard C, Dvorakova P, Wyckmans A, Stutterecker W, Laskari M, Almeida M, Kabele K, Magyar Z, Bartkiewicz P, Op‘t Veld P (2014) Integrated energy design—education and training in cross-disciplinary teams implementing energy performance of buildings directive (EPBD). Build Environ 72:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chai K-H, Xiao X (2012) Understanding design research: a bibliometric analysis of design studies (1996–2010). Des Stud 33(1):24–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cross N (2007) Editorial forty years of design research. Des Stud 28(1):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Boer J (2012) Top 5 of the greatest urban rooftop farms. http://popupcity.net/top-5-of-the-greatest-urban-rooftop-farms/
  17. Drew C, Nova KF, Fanning K (2014) The environmental impact of tall vs. small: a comparative study. In: Proceedings CTBUH Shanghai Conference, ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  18. Emmit S, Gorse CA (2007) Communication in construction teams. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Gericke K, Blessing L (2012) An analysis of design process models across disciplines. In: Proceedings International Design conference Design 2012, DubrovnikGoogle Scholar
  20. Gultekin AB, Yavaşbatmaz S (2013) Sustainable design of tall buildings. GRAĐEVINAR 65(5):449–461Google Scholar
  21. Gvozdenović K (2014) Roadmap to nearly zero energy buildings, towards nZEBs in 2020 in the Netherlands. Internshipreport RHDHV, TU Eindhoven, EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  22. Gylling G, Knudstrup MA, Heiselberg PK, Hansen EK (2011) Holistic evaluations of sustainable buildings through a symbiosis of quantitative and qualitative assessment methods. In: Proceedings 28th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (PLEA), Louvain-la-NeuveGoogle Scholar
  23. Hargrave J (2013, January) It’s alive! Can you imagine the urban building of the future? ARUP ForesightGoogle Scholar
  24. Hatchuel A, Weil B (2003) A new approach of innovative design: an introduction to C-K theory. In: Proceedings ICED 2003, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  25. Heiselberg P (2007) Integrated building design. DCE Lecture Notes No. 017, Aalborg University, AalborgGoogle Scholar
  26. Heller G (2014) A LEED platinum global model for vertical urbanism. In: Proceedings CTBUH Shanghai Conference, ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  27. Horváth I (2004) A treatise on order in engineering design research. Res Eng Des 15(3):155–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Architecture in Rotterdam (2014) High rise. http://www.architectuurinrotterdam.nl/cms.php?cmsid=65&lang=en
  29. Jin X-H, Zhang G, Zuo J, Lindsay S (2013) Sustainable high-rise design trends—Dubai’s strategy. Civi Eng Archit 1(2):33–41Google Scholar
  30. Jones JC (1970) Design methods. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  31. King D (2012) Holistic approach. CIBSE J 3(1):47–47Google Scholar
  32. Kroonenberg HH, van den Siers FJ (1992) Methodisch ontwerpen, Educaboek BV, CulemborgGoogle Scholar
  33. Le Masson P, Hatchuel A, Weil B (2012) How design theories support creativity—an historical perspective. In: Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Design Creativity, ICDC2012, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  34. Mendis P (2013) Safe and sustainable tall buildings: current practice and challenges for the future. Electron J Struct Eng 13(1):36–49Google Scholar
  35. Milana G, Gkoumas K, Bontempi F (2014) Sustainability concepts in the design of high-rise buildings: the case of diagrid systems. In: 3rd International Workshop on Design in Civil and Environmental Engineering (DCEE 3), Lyngby, 22–23 August 2014Google Scholar
  36. Molenaar DJ (2011) Oppervlaktewater, een verbetering bij warmtepompsystemen met warmte/koude opslag? Systeemanalyse, simulatie en metingen Maastoren te Rotterdam, MSc thesis, TU Eindhoven, EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  37. MVDRV (2015) EXPO 2000. http://www.mvrdv.nl/projects/EXPO/#
  38. Navaei F (2015) An overview of sustainable design factors in high-rise buildings. Int J Sci Technol Soc 3(2–1):18–23Google Scholar
  39. Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, Grote KH (2006) Engineering design, a systematic approach. In: Wallace K, Blessing L (eds) Translators, 3rd edn. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Plank W, Giradet H, Cox G (2002, February) Tall buildings and sustainability, the corporation of London. www.cityoflondon.gov.uk
  41. Poel B (2005) Integrated design with a focus on energy aspects. ECEEE 2005 summer study, Mandelieu La NapouleGoogle Scholar
  42. Powell R (1999) Rethinking the skyscraper, the complete architecture of Ken Yeang. Whitney Library of Design, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Quanjel EMCJ (2013) Collaborative design support. PhD thesis, TU Eindhoven, EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  44. Raji B, Tenpierik M, Dobbelsteen van den A (2014) A comparative study of design strategies for energy efficiency in 6 high-rise buildings in two different climates. In: Proceedings PLEA 2014—The 30th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Ahmedabad, 16–18 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  45. Ranjan BSRC, Srinivasan V, Chakrabarti A (2012) An extended, integrated model of designing. In: Proceedings of TMCE, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  46. Ritchey T (1998) General morphological analysis, a general method for non-quantified modeling. Paper presented at 16th EURO Conference on Operational Analysis, Brussel, The Swedish Morphological Society. www.swemorph.com
  47. Ritchey T (2004) Strategic decision support using computerised morphological analysis. In: 9th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  48. Ritchey T (2010) Wicked problems social messes, decision support modelling with morphological analysis. Swedish Morphological Society, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  49. Rovers R (2008) Sustainable housing projects, implementing a conceptual approach. Techne, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  50. Savanović P (2009) Integral design method in the context of sustainable building design. PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  51. Senescu R, Haymaker J (2013) Evaluating and improving the effectiveness and efficiency of design process communication. Adv Eng Inform 27:299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Senescu R, Aranda-Mena G, Haymaker J (2013) Relationships between project complexity and communication. J Manag Eng 29(2):183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith A (2015) Garden city. CIBSE J 6(3):46–50Google Scholar
  54. So A, Katz D, Wacks K (2014, June) Toward Zero Net Energy (ZNE) super high-rise commercial buildings, Continental Automated Building Association. CABA White PaperGoogle Scholar
  55. Taleghani M, Ansari HR, Jennings P (2010) Renewable energy education for architects: lessons from developed and developing countries. Int J Sustainable Energy 29(2):105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tomiyama T, Gu P, Jin Y, Lutters D, Kind C, Kimura F (2009) Design methodologies: industrial and educational applications. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(2):543–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. United Nations (2013) Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, world population prospects: the 2012 revision, Vol I: comprehensive tables ST/ESA/SER.A/336. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Documentation/pdf/WPP2012_Volume-I_Comprehensive-Tables.pdf
  58. USCB (2015) U.S. and world population clock, US Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/popclock/
  59. Utkutug GS (2004) Building design for a new century ecological/energy-efficient/intelligent buildings, TTMD. Turk Soc HVAC Sanit Eng J 1Google Scholar
  60. van Aken J (2005) Valid knowledge for the professional design of large and complex design processes. Des Stud 26(4):379–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. von Bertalanffy L (1976) General systems theory: foundations, development, applications. George Brazillers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Voss K, Sartori I, Lollini R (2012) Nearly-zero, net zero and plus energy buildings—how definitions & regulations affect the solutions. REHVA J 49(6):23–27Google Scholar
  63. Wood A (2013) A global analysis of tall, supertall and megatall buildings. Intell Glass Solutions 1:25–29Google Scholar
  64. Wynn D, Clarkson J (2005) Models of designing, in designing process improvement. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. Xu F, Zhang G, Xie M (2006) The emphasis on ecological design for high-rise buildings. In: Proceedings ICEBO 2006, ShenzhenGoogle Scholar
  66. Yeang K (1996) The skyscraper bioclimatically considered. Academy Editions, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Yeang K (1999) The green skyscraper: the basis for designing sustainable intensive buildings. Prestel Verlag, MunichGoogle Scholar
  68. Yong L (2014) Into the blue. CIBSE J 4(6):24–27Google Scholar
  69. Zoellner T (2013) Sexy fish and rocking berries. In: Presentation International Strawberry Congress, Antwerp. http://hoogstraten.eu/presentations/thursday/9_TomZollner_UrbanFarmers_StrawberryAntwerpEnTZ.pdf
  70. Zwicky F (1948) Morphological astronomy. Obs 68(845):121–143Google Scholar
  71. Zwicky F, Wilson AG (1966) New methods of thought and procedure, contributions to the symposium on methodologies, Pasadena. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TU EindhovenEindhovenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations