Social Media and Local Government in Canada: An Examination of Presence and Purpose

Abstract

The objective of this chapter is to undertake a critical examination of social media usage by local or municipal governments in Canada in terms of both presence and purpose. By presence, we mean the existence of social media channels linking municipal actors (administrative and political) to their local citizenry. By purpose, we mean the objectives sought by municipal actors in leveraging social media as either an informational and communications tool on the one hand, or as a platform for consultation and engagement on the other hand, or some combination of both. Based upon a wider review of social media government practices in Canada and a specific examination of four municipalities, we, therefore, seek to respond to the following key questions: (1) to what extent are local and predominantly urban governments in Canada making use of social media; (2) what is the balance between providing information and communications vs. seeking more interactive and collaborative forms of public engagement (and how is this balance reflected in both municipal intent and actual public participation); (3) what is the balance between administrative and political actors in social media deployment and public participation; and (4) what are the most significant and identifiable opportunities and challenges for municipalities in both widening and improving public engagement capacities through social media?

References

  1. Auditor General of Canada. (2013). Access to online services (chapter two). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Office of the Auditor General. Retrieved from http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_201311_02_e_38796.html
  2. Auditor General of Ontario. (2013). Service Ontario (chapter three). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Office of the Auditor General. Retrieved from http://www.auditor.on.ca/en/reports_en/en13/2013ar_en_web.pdf
  3. Batorski, M., & Hadden, D. (2010). Embracing government 2.0: Leading transformative change in the public sector. Alexandria, VA: Grant Thornton.Google Scholar
  4. BDO. (2013). Local councils embrace social media but are yet to fully see full financial benefit. BDO United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://www.bdo.co.uk/sectors/public-sector/local-government/our-research/social-media-within-local-authorities
  5. Bermonte, A. (2011). Senior leaders’ use of web 2.0 and social media in the Ontario public service. Theses and dissertations. Toronto, ON, Canada: Ryerson University. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.ryerson.ca/dissertations/680
  6. Borins, S., Kernaghan, K., Brown, D., 6, P., & Thompson, F. (2007). Digital state at the leading edge. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Britton, J. (2013). Councils reach out through social media but lack guidelines on how to use it. The guardian (online). Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/local-government-network/2013/jul/26/councils-trust-training-social-media-use
  8. Carr-West, J. (2009). From e-democracy to ‘here comes everybody’ a short history of government and the internet. In A. Sawford (Ed.), Local Government 3.0: How councils can respond to the New Web Agenda (pp. 4–9). London: Local Government Information Unit.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, A. (2013). Exploiting the web as a tool of democracy: New ways forward in the study and practice of digital democracy. In World forum for Democracy 2013 issues paper. Strasbourg, England: Council of Europe. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/news/wfd/study_en.pdf
  10. Gartner. (2012). The nexus of forces. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/doc/2049315
  11. Graham, M., & Johnson-Avery, E. (2013). Government public relations and social media: an analysis of the perceptions and trends of social media use at the local government level. Public Relations Journal, 7(4), 1–21.Google Scholar
  12. Gruzd, A., & Roy, J. (2014). Investigating political polarization on Twitter: A Canadian perspective. Policy and Internet, 6(1), 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison, T. M., Guerrero, S., Burke, B. G., Cook, M., Cresswell, A., Helbig, N., Hrdinova, J., & Pardo, T. (2012). Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Information Polity, 17(2), 83–97.Google Scholar
  14. Jellinek, D. (2012). Nine in ten councils embrace social media. E-Government Bulletin. Retrieved from http://www.headstar.com/egblive/?p=1118
  15. Kernaghan, K. (2013). Changing channels: Managing channel integration and migration in public organizations. Canadian Public Administration, 56(1), 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leavey, J. (2013). Social media and public policy: What is the evidence? Alliance for useful evidence. Retrieved from http://www.alliance4usefulevidence.org/assets/Social-Media-and-Public-Policy.pdf
  17. Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. (2011). An open government implementation model: Moving to increased public engagement. Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lips, M. (2012). E-government is dead: Long live public administration 2.0. Information Polity, 17(3–4), 239–250.Google Scholar
  19. Maier-Rabler, U., & Huber, S. (2011). “Open”: the changing relation between citizens, public administration, and political authority. JeDEM: Journal of Democracy, 3(2), 182–191.Google Scholar
  20. Mergel, I. (2012). The social media innovation challenge in the public sector. Information Polity., 17(3–4), 281–292.Google Scholar
  21. Mergel, I., & Greeves, B. (2013). Social media in the public sector field guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Mossberger, K., & Wu, Y. (2012). Civic engagement and local e-government: Social networking comes of age. Chicago, IL: UIC Institute for Policy and Civic Engagement.Google Scholar
  23. Reddick, C. G., & Aikins, S. K. (Eds.). (2012). Web 2.0 Technologies and democratic governance: political, policy and management implications. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Rees, D. (2013). Social Intelligence: realising the value of social media in local government. Local government Chronicle. Retrieved from http://www.lgcplus.com/briefings/social-intelligence-realising-the-value-of-social-media-in-local-government/5063277.article
  25. Roy, J. (2013). From machinery to mobility: Government and democracy in a participative age. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roy, J. (2014). Mobility and government: Opportunities and challenges for service delivery and information management. Toronto, ON, Canada: Institute for Citizen-Centred Service.Google Scholar
  27. Riarh, K. & Roy, J. (2014). The impacts of social media on government and democracy: An examination of municipal Usage in nova scotia, canada. Public Administration and Information Technology, Open Government 4:85–99.Google Scholar
  28. Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  29. Timoshenko, L., & Demers, J. (2012). Social media use among Ontario municipalities is growing fast. Toronto, ON, Canada: Redbrick Communications, Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Viitanen, J. (2010). Does transparency erode trust? Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/oct/03/transparency-trust-public-sector
  31. World Economic Forum. (2011). The future of government: Lessons learned from around the world. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on the Future of Government.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ted Rogers School of ManagementRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.School of Public AdministrationDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations