Skip to main content

An Examination of Greek College Students’ Perceptions of Positive and Negative Effects of Social Networking Use

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Social Networking and Education

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Social Networks ((LNSN))

Abstract

The vast array of social media network sites provide individuals with the opportunity for communication based on similar interests, occupations, events, or political views while integrating additional features such as mobile accessibility, video and photo sharing, and blogging. The benefits and drawbacks of social media networking vary depending on cultural and societal constructs. The purpose of the present chapter is to examine Greek college students’ perceptions (N = 258) of the positive and negative aspects of social networking. It also examines gender and age differences in these perceptions. Findings show that social networking has a positive effect on student learning, communication, and motivation. However, social networking can also lead to feelings of isolation and concerns about academic performance and privacy. Implications for practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Altuna J, Aydin H, Burham O, Amenabav N (2013) The digital user of social networks: a comparative, transcultural and intergenerational study. Int Online J Educ Sci 5(3):598–610

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernal C, Angulo F (2012) Interactions of young Andalusian people inside social networks. Dossier, pp 25–30. doi:10.3916/C40-2013-02-02

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bosch TE (2009) Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. Commun S Afr J Commun Theor Res 35(Gordon, #1706):185–200. doi:10.1080/02500160903250648

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd DM, Ellison MB (2008) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Mediat Commun 13:210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cadima R, Ojeda J, Monguet JM (2012) Social networks and performance in distributed learning communities. Educ Technol Soc 15(Gordon, #1706):296–304

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng K-H, Liang J-C, Tsai C-C (2013) University students’ online academic help seeking: the role of self-regulation and information commitments. Internet High Educ 16:70–77. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheung CMK, Chiu P-Y, Lee MKO (2011) Online social networks: why do students use facebook? Comput Hum Behav 27:1337–1343. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cho K, Cho MH (2013) Training of self-regulated learning skills on a social network system. Soc Psychol Educ 16:617–634. doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9229-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clafferty EM (2011) Facilitating social networking within the student experience. Int J Electr Eng Educ 48(3):245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dabbagh N, Kitsantas A (2012) Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet High Educ 15:3–8. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dabbagh N, Kitsantas A (2013) The role of social media in self-regulated learning. Int J Web Based Communities (IJWBC) (Special Issue, Social Networking and Education as a Catalyst Social Change) 9(Gordon, #1706):256–273. doi:10.1504/ijwbc.2013.053248

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duggan M, Brenner J (2013) The demographics of social media users-2012. Pew research center website. http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_SocialMediaUsers.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2014

  14. Global social media impact study (2013) ERC project 2011-AdG-295486 social network sites and social media. http://gsmis.org/. Accessed 19 May 2014

  15. Gross R, Acquisti A (2005) Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In: Proceedings of WPES’05, pp 71–80. ACM, Alexandria, VA. http://www.heinz.cmu.edu/~acquisti/papers/privacy-facebook-gross-acquisti.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2014

  16. Hew KF (2011) Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Comput Hum Behav 27:662–676. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson LA, Wang J-L (2013) Cultural differences in social networking site use: a comparative study of China and the United States. Comput Hum Behav 29:910–921. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Junco R (2012) Too much face and not enough books: the relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Comput Hum Behav 28:187–198. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Junco R (2013) Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Comput Hum Behav 29:626–631. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Junco R, Heibergert G, Loken E (2011) The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. J Comput Assist Learn 27:119–132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kimbrough AM, Guadagno RE, Muscanell NL, Dill J (2013) Gender differences in mediated communication: women connect more than do men. Comput Hum Behav 29:896–900. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kitsantas A, Chow A (2007) College students perceived threat and preference for seeking help in traditional, distributed, and distance learning environments. Comput Educ 48:383–395. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kitsantas A, Dabbagh N (2010) Learning to learn with integrative learning technologies. Information Age Publishing, Inc, Charlotte

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kitsantas A, Reiser RA, Doster J (2004) Developing self-regulated learners: goal setting, self-evaluation, and organizational signals during acquisition of procedural skills. J Exp Educ 72(Gordon, #1706):269–287. doi:10.3200/JEXE.72.4.269-287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oladejo MA, Adelua OO, Ige NA (2013) Age, gender, and computer self-efficacy as correlates of social media usage for scholarly works in Nigeria. In: Proceedings of the international conference on e-Learning, Cape Town, South Africa, pp 316–320

    Google Scholar 

  26. Murthy D, Rodriguez A, Kinstler L (2013) The potential for virtual communities to promote diversity in the sciences. Curr Sociol 61(7):1003–1020. doi:10.1177/0011392113502994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Myers SB, Endres MA, Ruddy ME, Zelikovsky N (2012) Psychology graduate training in the era of online social networking. Train Educ Prof Psychol 6(1):28–36. doi:10.1037/a0026388

    Google Scholar 

  28. Paul JA, Baker HM, Cochran JD (2012) Effects of online social networking on student academic performance. Comput Hum Behav 28:2117–2127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rizzuto TE, LeDoux J, Hatala JP (2009) It’s not just what you know, it’s who you know: testing a model of the relative importance of social networks to academic performance. Soc Psychol Educ 12:175–189. doi:10.1007/s11218-008-9080-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rouis S, Limayem M, Salehi-Sangari E (2011) Electron J Res Educ Psychol 9(3):961–994

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sánchez RA, Cortijo V, Javed U (2014) Students’ perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Comput Educ 70:138–149. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thompson SH, Lougheed E (2012) Frazzled by Facebook? An exploratory study of gender differences in social network communication among undergraduate men and women. Coll Student J 46(1):88–98

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vanderhoven E, Schellens T, Valcke M (2013) Exploring the usefulness of school education about risks on social network sites: a survey study. J Media Literacy Educ 5(1):285–294

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang S-L, Wu P-Y (2008) The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: the social cognitive perspective. Comput Educ 51:1589–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yu AY, Tian SW, Vogel D, Kwok RC-W (2010) Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts. Comput Educ 55:1494–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zimmerman BJ, Kitsantas A (1997) Developmental phases in self-regulation: shifting from process goals to outcome goals. J Educ Psychol 89(1):29–36. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kitsantas, T., Chirinos, D.S., Hiller, S.E., Kitsantas, A. (2016). An Examination of Greek College Students’ Perceptions of Positive and Negative Effects of Social Networking Use. In: Issa, T., Isaias, P., Kommers, P. (eds) Social Networking and Education. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17716-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17716-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17715-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17716-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics