Abstract
Knowledge transfer has become one of the major policy goals of governments across the world and is being encouraged at the national and EU level. While policy makers and academics continue to look for a knowledge transfer model that will work for all universities, some recent analyses have shown that specific local and historic conditions that affect a university’s ability to engage with the region need to be considered. This paper looks at the knowledge transfer activities of the three universities in the Greater Manchester area. All three universities are closely linked to their local environment and can trace their origin to the mid-nineteenth century and the development of Manchester as the “first industrial city”. Differences in research priorities and funding (cuts) have affected their development and left us with three distinct knowledge transfer strategies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
HE-BCI is an annual survey conducted since 2001, taking into account third stream income, university mission statements and non-commercial activities.
- 2.
The Elementary Education Act of 1870 recommended the establishment of school boards to provide elementary education.
- 3.
The Technical Instruction Act of 1889 allowed local authorities to offer technical or manual education.
- 4.
The Education Act of 1902 allowed local authorities to offer higher education.
- 5.
Previously Salford University Industrial Centre Ltd, renamed in 1986.
- 6.
In 2004 it merged with the University of Manchester’s innovation company.
- 7.
The Further Education Act of 1985 enabled local authorities to supply “goods and services through further education establishments”.
- 8.
Values for 2007 were reported in Table 14.2. The percentage changes in income are calculated adjusting for annual inflation.
- 9.
Values for 2012/2013 show no further recovery. 2013/2014 values were not available at the time of writing.
References
Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Stein J (2008) Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation. Rand J Econ 39(3):617–635
Andersen B, Rossi F (2011) Intellectual property governance and knowledge creation in UK Universities. Econ Innov New Technol 20:701–725
Arbo P, Benneworth P (2007) Understanding the regional contribution of higher education institutions: a literature review. OECD Education Working paper No. 9, OECD, Paris
Ashworth J (2009) How to take a financial crisis and turn it to your advantage. Times Higher Education, London. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/409222.article. 07 Jan 2014
Board of Education (BoE) (1918) The Universities of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. Great Britain. Board of Education, Educational pamphlets No. 33, HMSO, London
Bocock J, Taylor R (2003) The Labour Party and higher education: 1945–51. High Educ Q 57:249–265
Boucher G, Conway C, Van Der Meer E (2003) Tiers of engagement by universities in their region’s development. Reg Stud 37:887–897
Brentnall J (1957) Colleges of advanced technology. Nature 179:436
Breznitz S, Feldman M (2012) The engaged university. J Technol Transfer 37:139–157
Chatterton P, Goddard J (2000) The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. Eur J Educ 35:475–496
Cowan IR (1968) Mechanic’s Institute and science and art classes in Salford in the nineteenth century. Vocat Asp 20:201–210
DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48:147–160
Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Policy 6:147–162
Dosi G, Marengo L (2007) On the evolutionary and behavioural theories of organizations: a tentative roadmap. Organ Sci 18:491–502
Drucker J, Goldstein H (2007) Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities: a review of current approaches. Int Reg Sci Rev 30:20–46
Etzkowitz H, Webster A, Gebhardt C, Terra B (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Res Policy 29:313–330
European Research Associates (1988) The training needs of staff in the community’s higher education sector engaged in cooperation with industry. OOPEC, Luxembourg. http://aei.pitt.edu/40318/1/A4716.pdf. 07 Jan 2014
Feldman M, Desrochers P (2003) Research universities and local economic development: lessons from the history of the Johns Hopkins University. Ind Innov 10:5–24
Geels F (2014) Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: developing an inter-disciplinary triple embeddedness framework. Res Policy 43:261–277
Gibbons M, Johnston R (1975) The roles of science in technological innovation. Res Policy 3:220–242
Goddard J, Coombes M, Kempton L, Vallance P (2014) Universities as anchor institutions in cities in a turbulent funding environment: vulnerable institutions and vulnerable places in England. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 7(2):307–325
Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce (GMCC) (2013) Greater Manchester quarterly economic survey. Quarter 4. Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce, Manchester. http://gmchamber-stage.s3.amazonaws.com/attachments/947/original.pdf. 07 Jan 2014
Hall P (1998) Cities in civilization. Pantheon Books, New York, NY
Henderson RM, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting 1965–1988. Rev Econ Stat 80(1):119–127
Huggins R, Johnston A (2009) The economic and innovation contribution of universities: a regional perspective. Environ Plan C Gov Policy 27:1088–1106
Jones J (1836) Manchester: its political, social and commercial history, ancient and modern. Whittaker and Co., London
Kenney M, Goe WR (2004) The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Res Policy 33:691–707
Lewin AY, Long CP, Carroll TN (1999) The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organ Sci 10:535–550
Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU) (2011) Corporate strategy 2012-2017. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester. http://www2.mmu.ac.uk/about/corporate-strategy/mission/. 07 Jan 2014
Nature (1873) The Owens College, Manchester. Nature 8:506–509
Nature (1876a) The University of Manchester I. Nature 14:225–226
Nature (1876b) The University of Manchester III. Nature 14:265–266
Nature (1887) The Owens College. Nature 35:385–387
Nature (1944) Science and industry at Manchester. Nature 154:266
Nature (1949) Manchester Joint Research Council: report for 1948. Nature 163:520
Nelson RR (1986) Institutions supporting technical advance in industry. Am Econ Rev Proc 76:186–189
Phan PH, Siegel DS (2006) The effectiveness of university technology transfer: lessons learned from quantitative and qualitative research in the U.S. and the U.K. Working paper No. 0609, Department of Economics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Platt HL (2005) Shock cities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Polanyi K (1944) The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Beacon, Boston, MA
Powell J, Dayson K (2013) Engagement and the idea of the civic university. In: Benneworth P (ed) University engagement with socially excluded communities. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 143–162
Redfearn J (1981) Industry advertises. Nature 292:282
Richardson BD (1995) The development of Salford University Business Services Ltd. IEE Colloquium on University Consultancy Activities: Viewpoints of Providers and Users, IET, London, 3/1-3/3
Scott WR (1995) Institutions and organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Simmons AT (1901) Technical education in Manchester. Nature 63:336–337
Tapper T (2007) The governance of British Higher Education. Springer, Dordrecht
Taylor FR (1966) Library service to industry in Great Britain and on the Continent. Libr Trends 14:306–331
Thompson (1886) The Owens College: its foundation and growth and its connection with the Victoria University, Manchester. J. E. Cornish, Manchester
Thursby J, Kemp S (2002) Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Res Policy 31:109–124
University of Manchester (UoM) (2000) Manchester innovation history. University of Manchester, Manchester. (The Internet Archive, San Francisco). https://www.web.archive.org/web/20001001161453/http://www.maninv.com/company_history.htm. 07 Jan 2014
University of Manchester (UoM) (2010) Archive of the Manchester Joint Research Council. The John Rylands University Library, University of Manchester, Manchester. http://www.archives.li.man.ac.uk/ead/html/gb133jrc-p1.shtml#id3229338. 07 Jan 2014
University of Manchester (UoM) (2011) Manchester 2020. University of Manchester, Manchester. http://www.manchester.ac.uk/aboutus/vision/. 07 Jan 2014
University of Salford (UoS) (2009) Strategic plan 2009/10-2017/18. University of Salford, Salford. http://www.corporate.salford.ac.uk/strategy/. 07 Jan 2014
Uyarra E (2010) Conceptualizing the regional roles of universities, implications and contradictions. Eur Plan Stud 18:1227–1246
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Shiri Breznitz, participants of the Technology Transfer Society Conference in Bergamo and an anonymous referee for helpful suggestions and comments. This paper benefits from sponsorship within the Collegio Carlo Alberto Project “Researcher Mobility and Scientific Performance”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lawson, C. (2016). Putting the Region First: Knowledge Transfer at Universities in Greater Manchester. In: Audretsch, D., Lehmann, E., Meoli, M., Vismara, S. (eds) University Evolution, Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Competitiveness. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17713-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17713-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17712-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17713-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)