Skip to main content

Experience and the Object of Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mind in Action

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 18))

  • 1360 Accesses

Abstract

The Cartesian conception of mind is based on the dichotomy of external and internal, which, in its turn, is closely related to the classical conception of experience. Therefore, a consistent redefinition of mind in pragmatism requires a revision of the notion of experience formulated by early modern philosophers. The hidden causes of perceptions are replaced by the relation between two experienced situations mediated by habitual action or controlled operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brentano, F. (1924). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Erster Band. Leipzig: Felix Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (LW 1). (1981). Experience and nature, the later works 1. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (LW 4). (1984). The quest for certainty, the later works 4. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1962). Concerning body. The english works, trl. In M. William (Ed.), (Vol. I). London: Scientia Aalen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1959). An essay concerning human understanding. New York: Dower Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Määttänen, P. (1993). Action and experience. A naturalistic approach to cognition. Helsinki: Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae B 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, B. (1955). On the improvement of the understanding, the ethics, correspondence. Trl. In: R. H. M. Elwes (Eds.), New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pentti Määttänen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Määttänen, P. (2015). Experience and the Object of Knowledge. In: Mind in Action. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17623-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics