Advertisement

“The Medulla Oblongata Is a Very Serious and Lovely Object.” A Comparison of Neuroscientific and Psychoanalytical Theories

  • Edith Seifert

Abstract

Seifert begins her article with the hypothesis that neuroscience can provide a theoretical framework for psychoanalysis, but her analysis ultimately shows this claim to be inadequate. Although Freud’s dictum that man is “not even master in his own home” applies equally to the logic of the brain and central nervous system as it does to the logic of the psyche/the unconscious, there is still a decisive difference when it comes to the unconscious and Freud’s often neglected topographical definition of it as a place of alterity, inaccessible by the conscious and perpetually alien. According to Seifert, we need to be more aware of the disconnect between body and soul and recognize that both psychoanalytic theorems and neuroscientific discoveries are rooted in language. This means that the laws of neuroscience and the laws of psychoanalysis are indeed not the same and that an epistemic leap across the gap between the empirical objectivity of neurons and a symbolic order of the psyche is necessary.

Keywords

Linguistic neuroscience Structural psychoanalysis Benjamin Libet E. Du Bois-Reymond Lacan Psycho-physical parallelism J. M. Charcot 

References

  1. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error. Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Quill.Google Scholar
  2. Du Bois-Reymond, E. (1887). Über die Lebenskraft. In E. Du Bois-Reymond (Ed.), Reden von Emil du Bois-Reymond, BD II (pp. 1–28). Leipzig: Veit & Co. (Original work published 1848)Google Scholar
  3. Freud, S. (1895). Project for a scientific psychology. S.E. I.Google Scholar
  4. Freud, S. (1900). Interpretation of dreams. S.E. V.Google Scholar
  5. Freud, S. (1912). Einige Bemerkungen über den Begriff des Unbewußten in der Psychoanalyse. Stud. III.Google Scholar
  6. Freud, S. (1917). Introductory lectures on psychoanalysis/Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse. S.E. XV.Google Scholar
  7. Freud, S. (1940). An outline of psycho-analysis. S.E. XXIII.Google Scholar
  8. Grünbaum, A. (1988). Die Grundlagen der Psychoanalyse: Eine philosophische Kritik. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  9. Habermas, J. (1977). Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Lacan, J. (2006). Subversion of the subject and the dialectics of desire in the Freudian unconscious. In J. Lacan, Écrits. (B. Fink, Trans.) New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Leuschner, W. (1992). Introduction. In S. Freud (Ed.), Zur Auffassung der Aphasien (pp. 7–35). Frankfurt: Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Libet, B. (2004). Mind time: The temporal factor in consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.Google Scholar
  13. Pauen, M. (2001). Grundprobleme der Philosophie des Geistes. Frankfurt: Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud & philosophy: An essay on interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Seifert, E. (2008). Seele- Subjekt- Körper. Gießen: Psychosozial Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Singer, W. (1990). The formation of cooperative cell assemblies in the visual cortex. Journal of Experimental Biology, 153, 177–197.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychoanalytischer Salon BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations