Abstract

The introduction concerns itself with the current constellation of the dialogue between psychoanalysis and the neurosciences, identifies the areas where the most productive exchanges are occurring, and views the ongoing use of the hyphen in the word “neuro-psychoanalysis” as a telling symptom that invites questions about the problems inherent in the dialogues as well as their epistemological premises. This affects not only the various methods and techniques involved in the analysis of the psychological apparatus and its relation to physiological functions, but also, crucially, the terminology employed. The translation of Freud’s works plays a central role here, as the transfer of his concepts into English coincides with the empirical methods used in the neurosciences, while the reception of psychoanalysis as a theory on how meaning is constructed concentrates on Freud’s purposeful language. From a history of science perspective, the constellations around 2000 and 1900 will thereby be interpreted as a reverse mirror situation: a foundation of psychoanalysis based on neurology, while renouncing the localization-based paradigm (around 1900) and the rediscovery of Freud and the subconscious through neuropsychology, experimental psychology, and neuroscience (around 2000).

Keywords

Psychoanalysis Neurosciences Neuro-Psychoanalysis Freud History of Science 

References

  1. Ansermet, F., & Magistretti, P. (2004). À chacun son cerveau: Plasticité neuronale et inconscient. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  2. Blumenberg, H. (1960). Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
  3. Borck, C. (1998). Visualizing nerve cells and psychical mechanisms: The rhetoric of Freud’s illustrations. In G. Guttman & I. Scholz-Strasser (Eds.), Freud and the neurosciences. From brain research to the unconscious (pp. 57–86). Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  4. Bronfen, E., Erdle, B. R., & Weigel, S. (1999). Trauma: Zwischen Psychoanalyse und kulturellem Deutungsmuster. Köln: Böhlau.Google Scholar
  5. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  6. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  7. Freud, S. (1888). Hysteria. S.E. I. 37–59.Google Scholar
  8. Freud, S. (1895). Entwurf einer Psychologie. G.W. Nachtragsband, 373–486.Google Scholar
  9. Freud, S. (1900). Traumdeutung. G.W. II/III, 1–642.Google Scholar
  10. Freud, S. (1915). Triebe und Triebschicksale. G.W. X, 209–232.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, S. (1916). Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse. Stud. I, 33–445.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. S.E. XVIII, 1–64.Google Scholar
  13. Freud, S. (1930). Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. Stud. IX, 191–270.Google Scholar
  14. Fuchs, T., Sattel, H., & Henningsen, P. (Eds.). (2010). The embodied self: Dimensions, coherence and disorders. Stuttgart: Schattauer.Google Scholar
  15. Gallese, V. (2003). The roots of empathy: The shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 36, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallese, V. (2009). Mirror neurons, embodied simulation, and the neural basis of social identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19(5), 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldschmidt, G.-A. (1988). Quand Freud voit la mer. Paris: Buchet-Chastel.Google Scholar
  18. Guttmann, G., & Scholz-Strasser, I. (Eds.). (1998). Freud and the neurosciences: From brain research to the unconscious. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  19. Kandel, E. R. (2005). Psychiatry, psychoanalysis and the new biology of mind. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub.Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan-Solms, K., & Solms, M. (2000). Clinical studies in neuro-psychoanalysis: Introduction to a depth neuropsychology. Madison: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  21. Le Doux, J. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Roth, G., & Buchheim, A. (2007). Psychoanalyse – Neurobiologie – Trauma. Stuttgart/New York: Schattauer.Google Scholar
  23. Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Emde, R. M., & Pfeifer, R. (Eds.). (2013). Embodiment: Ein innovatives Konzept für Entwicklungsforschung und Psychoanalyse. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  24. Mancia, M. (Ed.). (2006). Psychoanalysis and neuroscience. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Rizzolatti, G. & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain. How our minds share actions and emotions. (F. Anderson, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press (ital. original 2006: So quel que fai, il cervello che agisce e i neuroni specchio).Google Scholar
  26. Schacter, D. L. (1996). Searching for memory: The brain, the mind, and the past. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Solms, M. (1995a). Is the brain more real than the mind? Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 9, 107–120.Google Scholar
  28. Solms, M. (1995b). New findings on the neurological organisation of dreaming: Implications for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 64, 43–67.Google Scholar
  29. Solms, M. (1996a). Towards an anatomy of the unconscious. Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis, 5, 331–367.Google Scholar
  30. Solms, M. (1996b). Was sind Affekte? Psyche, 50, 485–522.Google Scholar
  31. Solms, M. (2000). Dreaming and REM sleep are controlled by different brain mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 843–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Solms, M., & Saling, M. (1986). On psychoanalysis and neuroscience: Freud’s attitude to the localizationist tradition. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 67(4), 397–416.Google Scholar
  33. Solms, M., & Turnbull, O. (2002). The brain and the inner world: An introduction to the neuroscience of subjective experience. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  34. Starobinski, J. (1987). Kleine Geschichte des Körpergefühls. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  35. Starobinski, J., Grubich-Simitis, I., & Solms, M. (2006). Hundert Jahre Traumdeutung von Sigmund Freud: Drei Essays. Frankfurt: Fischer.Google Scholar
  36. Watt, D. (2000). The dialogue between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: Alienation and reparation. Neuropsychoanalysis. A Journal for Psychoanalysis and the Neurosciences, 2(2), 183–192.Google Scholar
  37. Whittle, P. (1999). Experimental psychology and psychoanalysis: What we can learn from a century of misunderstanding. Neuropsychoanalysis. A Journal for Psychoanalysis and the Neurosciences, 1(2), 233–245.Google Scholar
  38. Yu, C. K.-c. (2000). Clearing the ground: Misunderstanding of Freudian dream theory. Neuropsychoanalysis. A Journal for Psychoanalysis and the Neurosciences, 2(2), 212–213.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zentrum für Literatur- und Kulturforschung BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations