Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Recognition in Annelids and the Evolution of Social Recognition and Cognitive Abilities by Sexual Selection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Recognition in Invertebrates

Abstract

Social recognition has rarely received attention in the studies on annelids. This is not surprising since the biology of behavioral interactions in annelids is mostly unexplored. Only few pheromones have been identified, which function as cues in mate recognition and gamete release. Many annelids use chemical and visual cues to locate partners and classify them according to mating status, body size, or oocyte ripeness. In some hermaphroditic polychaete worms and leeches the ability to recognize the quality of potential partners seem to be very refined, especially in relation to the ability to assess the number of competitors over mating. These examples suggest that sexual selection might have favored individual ability to assess conspecific numerosity accurately and vary their male and female resource allocation (sex allocation) accordingly. Finally, annelids can estimate whether they are related to their potential partners and whether they belong to the same or a different population, which again result in adjustments of their reproductive allocation. We suggest that sexual selection is likely to be responsible for the evolution of the ability to assess mate quality and social group size because sex allocation adjustments are favored by sexual selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G, Bisazza A (2008) Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn 11:495–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Åkesson B (1972) Incipient reproductive isolation between geographic populations of Ophryotrocha labronica (Polychaeta, Dorvilleidae). Zool Scr 1(4):207–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthes N (2010) Mate choice and reproductive conflict in simultaneous hermaphrodites. Animal behaviour: evolution and mechanisms. Springer, New York, pp 329–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489):1390–1396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund A (1986) Sex change by a polychaete: effects of social and reproductive costs. Ecology 67(4):836–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund A (1990) Sequential hermaphroditism and the size-advantage hypothesis: an experimental test. Anim Behav 39(3):426–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund A (1991) To change or not to change sex: a comparison between two Ophryotrocha species (Polychaeta). Evol Ecol 5(2):128–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1987) Local mate competition and sex ratio in the diploid worm Dinophilus. Int J Invertebr Reprod Dev 12(2):223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • di Bona V, Lorenzi MC, Sella G (2010) Functional males in pair-mating outcrossing hermaphrodites. Biol J Linn Soc 100(2):451–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez J, Velando A (2013) Sexual selection in earthworms: Mate choice, sperm competition, differential allocation and partner manipulation. Appl Soil Ecol 69:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer A, Fischer U (1996) On the life-style and life-cycle of the luminescent polychaete Odontosyllis enopla (Annelida: Polychaeta). Invertebr Biol:236–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher N, Storey EJ, Johnson M, Reish DJ, Hardege JD (2009) Experience matters: females use smell to select experienced males for paternal care. PLoS ONE 4(11):e7672

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi F, Aquiloni L, Tricarico E (2012) Revisiting social recognition systems in invertebrates. Anim Cogn 15(5):745–762

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grothe C, Pfannenstiel H-D (1986) Cytophysiological study of neurosecretory and pheromonal influences on sexual development in Ophryotrocha puerilis (Polychaeta, Dorvilleidae). Int J Invertebr Reprod Dev 10(2):227–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex-ratios. Science 156:477–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardege JD (1999) Nereidid polychaetes as model organisms for marine chemical ecology. Hydrobiologia 402:145–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollis B, Kawecki TJ (2014) Male cognitive performance declines in the absence of sexual selection. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 281(1781):20132873

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanfranco M, Rolando A (1981) Sexual races and reproductive isolation in Ophryotrocha labronica La Greca and Bacci (Annelida, Polychaeta). Ital J Zool 48(3–4):291–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard JL (2005) Bateman’s principle and simultaneous hermaphrodites: a paradox. Integr Comp Biol 45(5):856–873

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard JL (2006) Sexual selection: lessons from hermaphrodite mating systems. Integr Comp Biol 46(4):349–367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay SM (2009) Ecology and biology of chemoreception in polychaetes. Zoosymposia 2:339–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi MC, Sella G (2000) Is individual recognition involved in the maintenance of pair bonds in Ophryotrocha diadema (Dorvilleidae Polychaeta)? Ethol Ecol Evol 12(2):197–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi MC, Sella G (2008) A measure of sexual selection in hermaphroditic animals: parentage skew and the opportunity for selection. J Evol Biol 21(3):827–833

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi MC, Sella G, Schleicherová D, Ramella L (2005) Outcrossing hermaphroditic polychaete worms adjust their sex allocation to social conditions. J Evol Biol 18(5):1341–1347

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi MC, Schleicherova D, Sella G (2008) Sex adjustments are not functionally costly in simultaneous hermaphrodites. Mar Biol 153(4):599–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi MC, Schleicherová D, Sella G (2014) Multiple paternity and mate competition in non-selfing, monogamous, egg-trading hermaphrodites. Acta Ethologica 17:173–179

    Google Scholar 

  • McComb K, Packer C, Pusey A (1994) Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions. Panthera leo Anim Behav 47:379–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Michiels NK, Hohner A, Vorndran IC (2001) Precopulatory mate assessment in relation to body size in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris: avoidance of dangerous liaisons? Behav Ecol 12(5):612–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Minetti C, Sella G, Lorenzi MC (2013) Population size, not density, serves as a cue for sex ratio adjustments in polychaete worms. Ital J Zool 80(4):547–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroy F, Aira M, Velando A, Domínguez J (2003) Have spermatophores in Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) any reproductive role? The 7th international symposium on earthworm ecology, Cardiff, Wales. Pedobiologia 47(5):526–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroy F, Aira M, Velando A, Domínguez J (2005) Size-assortative mating in the earthworm Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae). J Ethol 23(1):69–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker G (1998) Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Tim RB, Anders PM (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, New York, pp 3–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Purschke G (2005) Sense organs in polychaetes (Annelida). Morphology, molecules, evolution and phylogeny in polychaeta and related taxa. Springer, New York, pp 53–78

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ram JL, Fei X, Danaher SM, Lu S, Breithaupt T, Hardege JD (2008) Finding females: pheromone-guided reproductive tracking behavior by male Nereis succinea in the marine environment. J Exp Biol 211(5):757–765

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salva OR, Regolin L, Mascalzoni E, Vallortigara G (2012) Cerebral and behavioural asymmetries in animal social recognition. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 7:110–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleicherová D, Lorenzi MC, Sella G (2006) How outcrossing hermaphrodites sense the presence of conspecifics and suppress female allocation. Behav Ecol 17(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleicherová D, Lorenzi MC, Sella G, Michiels N (2010) Gender expression and group size: a test in a hermaphroditic and a gonochoric congeneric species of Ophryotrocha (Polychaeta). J Exp Biol 213(9):1586–1590

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicherová D, Sella G, Meconcelli S, Simonini R, Martino M, Cervella P, Lorenzi MC (2014) Does the cost of a function affect its degree of plasticity? A test on plastic sex allocation in three closely related species of hermaphrodites. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 453:148–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Schärer L (2009) Tests of sex allocation theory in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 63(6):1377–1405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sella G (1985) Reciprocal egg trading and brood care in a hermaphroditic polychaete worm. Anim Behav 33(3):938–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Sella G (1988) Reciprocation, reproductive success, and safeguards against cheating in a hermaphroditic polychaete worm, Ophryotrocha diadema Åkesson, 1976. Biol Bull 175(2):212–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Sella G (1990) Sex allocation in the simultaneously hermaphroditic polychaete worm Ophryotrocha diadema. Ecology 71(1):27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sella G (2006) Sexual strategies and mating systems. In: Rouse G, Pleijel F (eds) Reproductive biology and phylogeny in Annelida. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 77–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Sella G, Premoli MC, Turri F (1997) Egg trading in the simultaneously hermaphroditic polychaete worm Ophryotrocha gracilis (Huth). Behav Ecol 8:83–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 69–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonini R, Massamba-N’siala G, Grandi V, Prevedelli D (2009) Distribution of the genus Ophryotrocha (Polychaeta) in Italy: new records and comments on the biogeography of Mediterranean species. Vie et Milieu 59(1):79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey EJ, Reish DJ, Hardege JD (2013) Conditioned water affects pair formation behaviour in the marine polychaete Neanthes (Nereis) acuminata. Anim Cogn 16(1):85–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton R, Bolton E, Bartels-Hardege H, Eswards M, Reish D, Hardege JD (2005) Chemical signal mediated premating reproductive isolation in a marine polychaete, Neanthes acuminata (arenaceodentata). J Chem Ecol 31(8):1865–1876

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tan G, Govedich F, Burd M (2004) Social group size, potential sperm competition and reproductive investment in a hermaphroditic leech, Helobdella papillornata (Euhirudinea: Glossiphoniidae). J Evol Biol 17(3):574–580

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts EA, Dale J (2007) Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends Ecol Evol 22(10):529–537

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Velando A, Domínguez J, Ferreiro A (2006) Inbreeding and outbreeding reduces cocoon production in the earthworm Eisenia andrei. Eur J Soil Biol 42:S354–S357

    Google Scholar 

  • Velando A, Eiroa J, Domínguez J (2008) Brainless but not clueless: earthworms boost their ejaculates when they detect fecund non-virgin partners. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 275(1638):1067–1072

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald G, Rayport S (1977) Vision in annelid worms. Science 196(4297):1434–1439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson G, Bentley M, Gaudron S, Hardege JD (2003) The role of chemical signals in the spawning induction of polychaete worms and other marine invertebrates. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 294(2):169–187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Gage MJ, Parker GA (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol Evol 17(7):313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolken JJ, Florida RG (1984) The eye structure of the bioluminescent fireworm of Bermuda, Odontosyllis enopla. Biol Bull 166(1):260–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer RK, Butman CA (2000) Chemical signaling processes in the marine environment. Biol Bull 198(2):168–187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zirbes L, Deneubourg JL, Brostaux Y, Haubruge E (2010) A new case of consensual decision: collective movement in earthworms. Ethology 116(6):546–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Life Science and System Biology, University of Turin, via Accademia Albertina 13, Turin, Italy

    Maria Cristina Lorenzi, Stefania Meconcelli & Gabriella Sella

  2. LEEC-Laboratoire d’Ethologie Expérimentale et Comparée, Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 99 avenue J.-B. Clément, Villetaneuse, France

    Maria Cristina Lorenzi

Authors
  1. Maria Cristina Lorenzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefania Meconcelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gabriella Sella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cristina Lorenzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    Laura Aquiloni

  2. Department of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    Elena Tricarico

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lorenzi, M.C., Meconcelli, S., Sella, G. (2015). Social Recognition in Annelids and the Evolution of Social Recognition and Cognitive Abilities by Sexual Selection. In: Aquiloni, L., Tricarico, E. (eds) Social Recognition in Invertebrates. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17599-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation