Optimisation of Machining Parameters in Hard Turning by Desirability Function Analysis Using Response Surface Methodology

  • Nabil Kribes
  • Zahia Hessainia
  • Mohamed Athmane Yallese
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


In this study, the effects of cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut on surface roughness in the hard turning were experimentally investigated. AISI 4140 steel was hardened to (56 HRC) .The cutting tool used was an uncoated AL2O3/TiC mixed ceramics which is approximately composed of 70% of AL2O3 and 30% of TiC. Three factor (cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut) and three-level factorial experiment designs completed with a statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed. Mathematical model for surface roughness was developed using the response surface methodology (RSM)associated with response optimization technique and composite desirability was used to find optimum values of machining parameters with respect to objectives surface roughness. The results have revealed that the effect of feed is more pronounced than the effects of cutting speed and depth of cut, on the surface roughness. However, a higher cutting speed improves the surface finish. In addition, a good agreement between the predicted and measured surface roughness was observed. Therefore, the developed model can be effectively used to predict the surface roughness on the machining of AISI 4140 steel with in 95% confidence intervals ranges of conditions studied.


Hard turning Surface roughness prediction Response surface methodology (RSM) Ceramic tool ANOVA desirability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Palanikumar, K., Mata, F., Davim, J.P.: Analysis of surface roughness parameters in turning of FRP tubes by PCD tool 204, 469–474 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Thomas, T.R.: Characterisation of surface roughness parameters. Precis. Eng. 3, 2 (1981)Google Scholar
  3. Montgomery, D.C.: Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  4. York Puri, A.B., Bhattacharya, B.: Modeling and analysis of white layer depth in a wire –cut, EMD process through response surface methodology. Int. J. Mach Manuf. 25, 301–307 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ozcelik, B., Erzurmlu, T.: Determination of effecting dimensional parameters on war-page of thin shell plastic parts using integrated response surface method and genetic al-gorithm. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 32, 1085–1094 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choudhury, L.A., El-Baradie, M.A.: Surface roughness prediction in the turning of high- strength steel by factorial design of experiments. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 67(1-3), 55–61 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arbizu, I.P., Perez, C.J.L.: Surface roughness prediction by factorial design of experiments in turning processes. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 143, 390–396 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dabnun, M.A., Hashmi, M.S.J., El-Baradie, M.A.: Surface roughness prediction model by design of experiments for turning machinable glass-ceramic (Macor). J. Mater. Proc-ess. Technol. 164-165, 1289–1293 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sahin, Y., Motorcu, A.R.: Surface roughness model for machining mild steel with coated car-bide tool. Mater. Des. 26(4), 321–326 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cakir, M.C., Ensarioglu, C., Demirayak, I.: Mathematical modeling of surface roughness for evaluating the effects of cutting parameters and coating material. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209(1), 102–109 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hessainia, Z., Belbah, A., Yallese, M.A., Mabrouki, T., Rigal, J.F.: On the prediction of surface roughness in the hard turning based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations. Measurement 46, 1671–1681 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kribes, N., Hessainia, Z., Yallese, M.A., Ouelaa, N.: Statistical analysis of surface roughness by design of experiments in hard turning. Mechanika 18(5), 605–611 (2012) ISSN 1392-1207 Google Scholar
  13. Hessainia, Z.: Thèse de doctorat, Etude de l’impact des paramètres affectant la rugosité des surfaces et les efforts de coupe en usinage des pièces traitées thermiquement, Université de 08 Mai 1945 Guelma (2014)Google Scholar
  14. Gained, V.N., Karnik, S.R., Faustino, M., Davim, J.P.: Machinability analysis in turning tung-sten-copper composite for application in EDM electrodes. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater. 27, 754–763 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Palanikumar, K., Karthikeyan, R.: Optimal machining conditions for turning of particulate metal matrix composites using Taguchi and response surface methodologies. Mach. Sci.Technol. 10, 417–433 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C.: Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nabil Kribes
    • 2
  • Zahia Hessainia
    • 1
  • Mohamed Athmane Yallese
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanics and Structures Research Laboratory(LMS), May 8th 1945 UniversityGuelmaAlgeria
  2. 2.Laboratory (LMANM) May 8th 1945 UniversityGuelmaAlgeria

Personalised recommendations