Advertisement

Traffic Management along Air Streams through Space Metering

  • Mastura Ab WahidEmail author
  • Hakim Bouadi
  • Antoine Drouin
  • Benjamas Panomruttanarug
  • Felix Mora-Camino

Abstract

Via the current performances of aeronautical communication, navigation and surveillance systems, free flight and traffic management through trajectory negotiation have become a reality. However, the adoption of free flight in congested airspace leads to an increase of the number of potential traffic conflicts which are solved by diverting aircraft from their original flight plan, limiting the benefits of free flight. For high density traffic, air corridor concept and time-based flow management have recently been proposed. In the present paper, it is proposed to organize main traffic flows in congested airspace along air streams which are characterized by a three-dimensional (3D) common reference track and lateral lanes with a dynamic slot structure. There aircraft position is processed in a local space indexed axial coordinates system which should ease the management of traffic separation and surveillance. This change results in the need to develop new 3D space indexed guidance modes to perform position tracking, as well as to design and assign standard trajectories to enter into, evolve inside and exit from the air stream while insuring time and space separation between aircraft.

Keywords

Transportation Research Part Ground Speed Free Slot Collision Avoidance System Guidance Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Paielli, R.A., Erzberger, H.: Conflict probability estimation for free flight, NASA Technical Memorandum 110411 (October 1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ramamoorthy, K., Crassidis, J.L., Singh, T.: Potential functions for en-route air traffic management and flight planning. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, Control. Providence, Rhodes Island (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Joint Planning and Development Office, Concepts of operations for the next generation air transportation system, Washington, D.C. (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ky, P., Miaillier, B.: Sesar: towards the new generation of air traffic management systems in Europe. Journal of Air Traffic Control 48(1), 11–14 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoffman, R., Prete, J.: Principles of airspace tube design for dynamic airspace configuration. In: Proceedings of the 8th AIAA-ATIO Conference, AIAA-2008-8939 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yousefi, A., Zadeh, A.N., Tafazzoli, A.: A dynamic allocation and benefit assessment of NextGen flow corridors. Transportation Research Part C 33, 297–310 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ye, B., Hu, M., Shortle, J.F.: Collision risk-capacity tradeoff analysis of an route corridor model. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 27(1), 124–135 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fedchin, S.S.: Aircraft Navigation. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington (1969)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nourel Din, A., Karamat, T.B., Georgy, J.: Fundamentals of Inertial Navigation. Satellite-based Position and their integration. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baleri, G.: Datum Transformations of NAV420 Reference Frames; Crossbow Technology, Inc., http://www.xbow.com
  11. 11.
    Grewal, M.S., Weill, L.R., Andrews, A.P.: Global Positioning Systems, Inertial Navigation and Integration. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mora-Camino, F.: Flight Control Systems, Lecture Notes, ENAC (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bouadi, H., Mora-Camino, F.: Aircraft trajectory tacking by nonlinear spatial inversion, AIAA-GNC, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 10.2514/6. 2012-4613 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shen, T.J.: Les Réseaux Neurones Affines et Leur Application à la Commande Automatique du Vol, PhD thesis, INPT, Toulouse, France (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weitz, L.A.: Investigating string stability of a time-history control law for Interval Management. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 33, 257–271 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bouadi, H., Choukroun, D., Mora-Camino, F.: Aircraft longitudinal guidance based on a spatial reference. In: Chu, Q., Mulder, B., Choukroun, D., van Kampen, E.-J., de Visser, C., Looye, G. (eds.) Advances in Aerospace Guidance, Navigation and Control, vol. 135, pp. 427–442. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lu, W.C., Duan, L., Hsiao, F.B., Mora-Camino, F.: Neural Guidance Control for Aircraft Based on Differential Flatness. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 31(4), 892–898 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mastura Ab Wahid
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hakim Bouadi
    • 2
  • Antoine Drouin
    • 1
  • Benjamas Panomruttanarug
    • 3
  • Felix Mora-Camino
    • 1
  1. 1.MAIAA Lab., French Civil Aviation Institute (ENAC)University of ToulouseToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Robotics and Production LaboratoryPolytechnic Military SchoolBordj el BahriAlgeria
  3. 3.Department of ControlKing Mongkuts University of TechnologyBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations