Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is twofold: to show where the book stands in the discipline of the political science, and to demonstrate how it would advance the study of business actors in global environmental governance. To begin with, this chapter firstly classifies existent literatures on business actors approach in the discipline of global environmental governance into following four categories: business self-regulations, public-private partnerships, non-state market driven governance and business conflict school . Second, based on the first point, a constructivist perspective on business actors and environmental governance is introduced. Finally, given the insights of the constructivist theory, it explains how the case of automobile industry would add new insights on extant approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Liberal institutionalist position associates with so-called ‘Neo-Liberal Institutionalism’ in International Relations. The core assumption of the theory is placed on the role of international institutions in international politics. By drawing upon the Prisoner’s Dilemma in game theory, it argues that the key to solve the Dilemma is to convince and shift the perception of the other parties that it is possible to gain mutual benefits achieved by long term cooperation, rather than the imaginary benefits that could be gained by the act of Defection. To put simply, it is needed that Prisoner’s Dilemma to be played over time. To ensure the game to be played over time is to establish international regimes. Regimes facilitate cooperation because for example, they do change patterns of transaction costs and provide information to participants, so that uncertainty is reduced. Thus regimes facilitate cooperation because they disseminate information, monitor behaviour and therefore help to prevent cheating. Moreover, regimes facilitate cooperation among states because they: facilitate issue inter-linkage; increase number of interaction; help states to find partners to cooperate because regimes allow reputation to be developed and this influence states’ future potential to do so (Keohane and Axelrod 1985).
- 2.
Regimes refers to a set of explicit of implicit “principles, norms, and decision making procedures around which actor expectations converge in a given issue-area” (Krasner 1983).
- 3.
Earth system transformation is marked by “persistent uncertainty regarding the causes of global environmental change, its impacts, the interlinkage of various causes and response options, and the effects of possible response options….Uncertainty hence poses particular governance challenges. It requires governance to be stable over decades and centuries to withstand sudden changes of earth system parameters (or changes in out knowledge about these parameters), but also to be flexible enough to adapt to changes within the larger stable framework. Governance must be oriented towards the long term, but must also provide solutions for the near future” (Biermann 2007, pp. 329–330).
- 4.
The UNCTC was established in 1972 as the focal point, for all matters related to transnational corporations and foreign direct investment within the United Nations system. In 1993, the UNCTC was transferred to the Division on Investment, Technology and Enterprise Development of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (UNCTAD) in Geneva.
- 5.
WBCSD was originally established in 1990 as Business Council for Sustainable Development among 48 business leaders to represent the voice of business at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio. The WBCSD was formed in 1995 in order to “galvanize the global business community to create a sustainable future for business, society and the environment” (WBCSD n.d.).
- 6.
BASD is a joint initiative between WBCSD and International Chamber of Commerce in order to form a “comprehensive network of business organizations that have come together under one banner in the interests of sustainable development” (BASD n.d).
- 7.
As applied in the case of climate change politics, there are several evidences that support business self-regulations. These supports are driven by the perceptions that “over the long term the world will have to deal with climate change, so their climate-friendly investments will pay off” (Bang et al. 2005, p. 292). Firstly, the Global Climate Coalition (GCC), which exercised strong anti-active lobbying efforts to block any international regulations of GHGs emissions during 1990s, was dismissed in early 2002. By 1997, with the growing scientific and public consensus regarding the high risks of climate change issue, a number of GCC supporters reconsidered the negative PR implications of their involvement in the group. Consequently, with the withdrawn by the BP, a numbers of major companies abandoned GCC such as American Electric Power, Dupont, Shell, Ford, Daimler Chrysler, Texaco and General Mortars (Source Watch n.d.). Secondly, instead of abandoning the GCC, some of these business actors such as BP and Shell, formed a pro-active environmental coalition called the ‘Partnership for Climate Action’, which aims to reduce their aggregate emissions by 15 percent from 1990 levels by 2010 using market-based mechanisms, such as by developing an internal carbon trading scheme (Bang et al. 2005, pp. 291–292). Thirdly, the ‘Chicago Climate Exchange Chicago Climate Exchange’ (CCX, for short) is established in June 2001. The CCX is a ‘greenhouse gas emission registry, reduction and trading system for all six greenhouse gasses’ where ‘members make voluntary but legally binding commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions’. The member of CCX includes such as Ford, DuPont, and American Electric Power. It sets the goal for all members to reduce direct emissions of 4 % below a baseline period of 1998–2001, by the end of December 2006 (CCX n.d.). Fourthly, some oil companies such as BP and Shell have begun to invest in solar energy. In the case of Shell, it established the Shell International Renewables in 1998, and invested $500 million over five years in renewable energy (Levy 2005, p. 84).
- 8.
‘Rationalists’ refers to those who adopted so-called neo-realism and/or neo-liberalism, those of which emphasize the importance of international system and treat the interest of states as given.
- 9.
The rise of Constructivism is sometimes referred as ‘the middle way’ between Rationalism (a theory of International Relations that adopted positivist epistemology) and Reflectivism (other theories that reject positivism, including critical theory and postmodernism). Constructivism is also labeled as ‘new orthodoxy’, as it offers new ontological perspective that is different from Neo-Realism and Neo-Liberal Institutionalism .
- 10.
Ozone depletion is an issue that the total volume of the ozone layer is destroyed by man-made ozone-depleting substances (ODS), such as halocarbon Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC).
- 11.
The first mover’s advantage or, Porter’s hypothesis, claims that any companies would gain the advantage by occupying market segment.
- 12.
Alternative Fluorocarbons Environmental Acceptability Study in 1987.
- 13.
Program for Alternative Fluorocarbon Toxicology Testing in 1988.
- 14.
European companies were the biggest producer of CFC in 1986, that produced 48 % of the world share compare to the US which produced 28 %.
References
Adler E (1997) Seizing the middle ground. Eur J Int Relat 3:319–364
Bang G et al (2005) Future U.S. climate policy: international re-engagement? Int Stud Perspect 6(3):285–303
BASD (n.d.) What is BASD? Retrieved from http://basd.free.fr/about/index.html
Biermann F (2007) “Earth system governance” as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Glob Environ Change 17:326–337
Biermann F et al (2009) Earth system governance: people, places and the planet. Science and implementation plan of the earth system governance project. Bonn
Bäckstrand K (2008) Accountability of networked climate governance: the rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environ Politics 8(3):74–102
Bendell J (2000) Terms for endearment: business, NGOs and sustainable development. Greenleaf, Sheffield
Berger PL, Luckmann T (1967) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor, New York
Bernstein S, Cashore B (2007) Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regul Governance 1(4):347–371
Börzel TA, Risse T (2005) Public-private partnerships. Effective and legitimate tools of transnational governance? In: Grande E, Pauly LW (eds) Complex sovereignty: on the reconstitution of political authority in the 21st century. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 195–216
Bramble BJ, Porter G (1992) Non-governmental organizations and the making of US international environmental policy. In: Hurrell A, Kingsbury B (eds) The international politics of the environment: actors, interests, and institution. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 313–353
Carroll WK (2007) Hegemony and counter-hegemony in a global field. Stud Soc Justice 1(1):36–66
Cashore B (2002) Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule making authority. Governance 15(4):503–529
CCX (n.d.) About CCX. Retrieved 2 Apr 2012, from https://www.theice.com/ccx.jhtml
Chan S, Pattberg P (2008) Private rule-making and the politics of accountability: analyzing global forest governance. Global Environ Politics 8(3):103–121
Christoff P, Ekersley R (2007) The Kyoto protocol and the Asia Pacific partnership on clean development and climate. In: Bonyhady T, Christoff P (eds) Climate law in Australia. Federation Press Sydney, Sydney, pp 32–45
Clapp J (1998) The privatization of global environmental governance: ISO 14000 and the developing world. Glob Gov 4:295–316
Clapp J (2003) Transnational Corporate Interests and Global Environmental Governance: Negotiating Rules for Agricultural Biotechnology and Chemicals. Environ Politics 12(4):1–23
Clapp J (2005) Global environmental governance for corporate responsibility and accountability. Global Environ Politics 5(3):23–34
Connelly J et al (2002) Politics and the environment: from theory to practice, 2nd edn. Routledge, London
De Sombre E (2000) Domestic sources of international environmental policy: industry, environmentalists, and US power. MIT Press, Cambridge
Dellas E et al (2011) Agency in earth system governance: refining a research agenda. Int Environ Agreements: Politics Law Econ 11(1):85–98
Desombre ER (2005) Fishing under flags of convenience: using market power to increase participation in international. Global Environ Politics 5(4):73–94
Doyle T, McEachern D (1998) Environment and politics. Routledge, London
European Commission (2011) How effective is the Forest Stewardship Council certification schemes. Brussels
Falkner R (2001) Business conflict and US Policy. In: Harris PG (ed) The environment, international relations, and U.S. foreign policy. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp 157–177
Falkner R (2003) Private environmental governance and international relations: exploring the links. Global Environ Politics 3(2):72–87
Falkner R (2005) The business of ozone layer protection: corporate power in regime evolution. In: Levy DL, Newell PJ (eds) The business of global environmental governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 105–134
Falkner R (2008) Business power and conflict in international environmental politics. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke
Finnemore M (1996) National interests in international society. Cornell University Press, New York
Giddens A (1986) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press, Oakland
Goldstein J (1996) International law and domestic institutions: reconciling North American “unfair trade” laws. Int Organ 50:541–564
Gourevitch P (1996) Squaring the circle: the domestic sources of international cooperation. Int Organ 50:349–373
Haas PM (1992) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ 46(1):1–35
Hall RB (1999) National collective identity: social constructs and international systems. Columbia University Press, New York
Hall PA, Soskice DW (2001) Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hurrell A, Kingsbury B (eds) (1992) The international politics of the environment: actors, interests, and institution. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Jacobs M (1991) The green economy: environment, sustainable development and the politics of the future. Pluto, London
Jagers SC, Stripple J (2003) Climate governance beyond the state. Glob Gov: Rev Multilateralism Int Organ 9(3):385–399
Katzenstein P (1996) Cultural norms and national security: police and military in postwar Japan. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Keidanren (1997) Keidanren voluntary action plan on the environment. Tokyo
Keohane RO (1988) International institutions: two approaches. Int Stud Quart 32:379–396
Keohane R, Axelrod R (1985) Achieving cooperation under anarchy: strategies and institutions. World Politics 38(1):226–254
Keohane R, Levy M (1996) Institutions for environmental aid: pitfalls and promise. MIT Press, Cambridge
Keohane R, Nye J (2000) Power and interdependence, 2nd edn. Harper Collins, New York
Krasner S (1983) International regimes. Cornell University Press, New York
Kratochwil F (1989) Rules, norms and decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lawrence P (2007) The Asia Pacific partnership on clean development and climate (AP6): a distraction to the Kyoto processor a viable alternative? Asia Pac J Environ Law 10(3/4):183–209
Levy D (1997) Business and international environmental treaties: ozone depletion and climate change. Calif Manag Rev 39(3):54–71
Levy D (2005) Business and the evolution of the climate regime: the dynamics of corporate strategies. In: Levy DL, Newell PJ (eds) The business of global environmental governance. MIT Press, Cambridge
Levy D, Newell P (2002) Business strategy and international environmental governance: toward a neo-gramscian synthesis. Global Environ Politics 2(4):84–101
Levy D, Newell P (eds) (2005) The business of global environmental governance. MIT Press, Cambridge
Lipschutz RD (2004) Limitations of empire. Global Environ Politics 2004(May):20–23
McGee J, Taplin R (2006) The Asia-Pacific partnership on clean development and climate: a complement or competitor to the Kyoto protocol? Glob Change Peace Secur 18(3):173–192
Mikler J (2006) Varieties of capitalism: national institutional explanations of environmental product developments in the car industry. The University of Sydney, Sydney
Mikler J (2007) Varieties of capitalism and the auto industry’s environmental initiatives: institutional explanations for firms’ motivations. Bus Politics 9(1):1–38
Mikler J (2008) Sharing sovereignty for global regulation: the cases of fuel economy and online gambling. Regul Governance 2(4):383–404
Mikler J (2009) Greening the car industry: varieties of capitalism and climate change. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Mikler J (2010) Business as usual or apocalypse now? Regulating the car industry’s carbon emissions. In: Third Biennial conference of the european consortium on political research standing group on regulatory governance. Dublin
Newell P (2001a) Environmental NGOs, TNCs, and the question of governance. In: Stevis D, Assetto VJ (eds) The international political economy of the environment. Lynne Reinner, London, pp 85–107
Newell P (2001b) Managing multinationals: the governance of investment for the environment. J Int Dev 13:907–919
Newell P (2005) Business and international environmental governance: the state of the art. In: Levy DL, Newell P (eds) The business of global environmental governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 21–45
Newell P, Paterson M (1998) A climate for business: global warming, the state and capital. Rev Int Polit Econ 5(4):679–703
Onuf N (1989) World of our making. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia
Paarlberg RL (1996) A domestic dispute: Clinton, Congress, and international environmental policy. Environment 38(8):16–20
Pattberg P (2005) What role for private rule-making in global environmental governance? analysing the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). Int Environ Agreements: Politics Law Econ 5(2):175–189. doi:10.1007/s10784-005-0951-y
Pattberg P (2007) Private Institutions and Global Governance. The New Politics of Environmental Sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Pattberg P, Stripple J (2008) Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century. Int Environ Agreements: Politics Law Econ 8(4):367–388
Pearse R (2010) Making a market? Contestation and climate change. J Aust Polit Econ 66:166–198
Porter G, Brown JW (1996) Glob Environ Politics. Westview Press, Boulder
Pratt N (2004) Bringing politics back in: examining the link between globalisation and democratization. Rev Int Polit Econ 11(2):311–336
Raustiala K (1997) Domestic institutions and international regulatory cooperation. World Politics 49(4):482–509
Reus-Smit C (2005) Constructivism. In: Burchill S, Linklater A, Devetak R, Donnelly J, Paterson M, Reus-Smit C, True J (eds) Theories of international relations, 3rd edn. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke, pp 188–211
Rosenau JN (1995) Governance, order, and change in world politics. Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rowlands I (1995) The politics of global atmospheric change. Manchster University Press, Manchester
Rowlands I (2001) Transnational corporations and global environmental politics. In: Wallace W, Josselin D (eds) Non-state actors in world politics. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke, pp 133–149
Ruggie J (1998) Constructing the world polity. Routledge, London
Schreurs MA, Economy E (1997) The internationalization of environmental protection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Smith S (1999) Social constructivisms and European studies: a reflectivist critique. J Eur Public Policy 6(4):682–691
Source Watch (n.d.) Global climate coalition. Retrieved 29 Mar 2012, from http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Global_Climate_Coalition
Sussman G (2004) The USA and global environmental policy: domestic constraints on effective leadership. Int Polit Sci Rev 25(4):349–369
Underdal A, Hanf K (2000) International environmental agreements and domestic politics: the case of acid rain. Ashgate, Aldershot
Usui M (2002) The role of private business in international environmental governance. Working Paper IAS–CGP Project on Intl Environ Governance, pp 1–31
Van Asselt H (2007) From UNI-ty to diversity? The UNFCCC, the Asia-Pacific partnership, and the future of international law on climate change. Carbon Climate Law 1(1):17–28
Vogel D (2003) The hare and the tortoise revisited: the new politics of consumer and environmental regulation in Europe. Br J Polit Sci 33(4):557–580
Waltz K (1959) Man, the state and war. Columbia University Press, New York
Wapner P (1995) Politics beyond the state: environmental activism and world civic politics. World Politics 47(3):311–340
WBCSD (n.d.) Overview. Retrieved 5 Mar 2013, from http://www.wbcsd.org/about.aspx
Weaver K, Rockman B (1993) Do institutions matter? Brookings Institution, Washington DC
Webb K (2002) Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, The Public Interest and Innovation. Otawa: Carlton University
Wendt A (1987) The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. Int Organ 41(3):335–370
Wendt A (1992) Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization 46(2):391–425
Wendt A (1999) Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
WWF (n.d.) Making fishing sustainable
Young OR (1999) Governance in world affairs. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Iguchi, M. (2015). Business Actors in Global Environmental Governance. In: Divergence and Convergence of Automobile Fuel Economy Regulations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17500-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17500-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17499-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17500-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)