Advertisement

Morphosyntactic Correlates of Gestures: A Gesture Associated with Negation in French and Its Organisation with Speech

  • Simon HarrisonEmail author
  • Pierre Larrivée
Chapter
Part of the Language, Cognition, and Mind book series (LCAM, volume 1)

Abstract

In this paper, we present novel observations indicating that the syntax of clause negation in French constrains how speakers perform a specific gestural form associated with negation. As previously demonstrated for English (Harrison 2010), the Palm-Down-Horizontal-Across (PDA) gesture that we study tends to be coordinated with the main propositional negator and then held in space with the proceeding clause-mate elements. This tendency is confirmed by the French data from an audiovisual corpus of naturalistic conversations. These new data show that the PDA gesture stroke starts with the vocal marker of negation in French as well. This invites further investigation into the relation between propositional structure and structural aspects of gestures as a full component of linguistic organisation.

Keywords

Gesture Clausal negation French 

References

  1. Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (1999). Mapping the range of information contained in the iconic hand gestures that accompany spontaneous speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 438–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bressem, J. (2013). A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body—Language—Communication (pp. 1079–1098). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  3. Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014). The family of away gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body—Language—Communication (pp. 1592–1604). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  4. Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gesture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Calbris, G. (2003). From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis. Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions. Gesture, 3, 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calbris, G. (2005). La négation: Son symbolisme physique. http://gesture-lyon2005.ens-lsh.fr/article.php3?id_article=222.
  7. Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book. Rowley: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  9. Cienki, A. (2012). Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units we (may) abstract from them. Lodz Studies in Language, 25, 149–158.Google Scholar
  10. Cienki, A. (in press). Spoken language usage events. Language and Cognition.Google Scholar
  11. Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  12. de Brabanter, P. (2007). Uttering sentences made up of words and gestures. E. Romero & B. Soria (Eds.), Explicit communication: Robyn Carston’s pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  13. Downing, A., & Locke, P. (1992). A university course in English grammar. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Dryer, M. S. (1996). Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 475–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duncan, S., Cassell, J. H., & Levy, E. (2007). Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language. Essays in honour of David McNeill. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Efron, D. (1972). Gesture, race, and culture. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  17. Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, Cognition, and the Brain. Insights from Sign Language Research. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Escandell-Vidal, V., Leonetti, M., & Ahern, A. (Eds.). (2011). Procedural meaning. Problems and perspectives. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  19. Fricke, E. (2008). Grundlagen einer multimodalen Grammatik des Deutschen: Lokaldeixis im Deutschen: Syntaktische Strukturen und Funktionen. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  20. Fricke, E. (2013). Towards a unified grammar of gesture and speech: A multimodal approach. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill & S. Teßendorf (Eds.) Body—Language—Communication (pp. 733–754). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  21. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Harrison, S. (2009a). The expression of negation through grammar and gesture. In J. Zlatev, M. Andrén, M. Johansson Falck & C. Lundmark (Eds.), Studies in language and cognition (pp. 405–409). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  23. Harrison, S. (2009b). Grammar, gesture, and cognition: The case of negation in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Bordeaux 3.Google Scholar
  24. Harrison, S. (2010). Evidence for node and scope of negation in coverbal gesture. Gesture, 10(1), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harrison, S. (2013). The temporal coordination of negation gestures in relation to speech. In Proceedings of TiGeR 2013.Google Scholar
  26. Harrison, S. (2014). Head shakes: Variation in form, function, and cultural distribution of a head movement related to ‘no’. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill & J. Bressem (Eds.), BodyLanguageCommunication (pp. 1496–1501). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  27. Jouitteau, M. (2004). Gestures as expletives: Multichannel syntax. In G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (Eds.), WCCFL 23 Proceedings (pp. 101–114). Somerville: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
  28. Jouitteau, M. (2007). Listen to the sound of salience, multichannel syntax Q particles. In S. Baauw & F. Drijkoningen (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2005 (pp. 185–200). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  29. Jungheim, N. O. (2008). Language learner and native speaker perceptions of Japanese refusal gestures portrayed in video. In S. G. McCafferty & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture. Second language acquisition and classroom research (pp. 157–182). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), The relation between verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–227). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  31. Kendon, A. (1988). How gestures can become like words. In F. Poyatos (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication (pp. 131–141). Lewiston: C.J. Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  32. Kendon, A. (1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kendon, A. (2002). Some uses of the head shake. Gesture, 2, 147–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kendon, A. (2007). On the origins of modern gesture studies. In S. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (pp. 13–28). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kita, S. (1993). Language and thought interface: A study of spontaneous gestures and Japanese mimetics. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  37. Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Klima, E. (1964). Negation in english. In J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language (pp. 246–323). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Klima, E. S., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesmen, R. F. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 261–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ladewig, S. (2011). Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. Cognitextes, 6.Google Scholar
  42. Ladewig, S. (2014a). Recurrent gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill & J. Bressem (Eds.), BodyLanguageCommunication (pp. 1558–1574). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  43. Ladewig, S. (2014b). The cyclic gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill & J. Bressem (Eds.), BodyLanguageCommunication (pp. 1605–1618). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  44. Larrivée, P. (2004). L’Association négative. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
  45. Larrivée, P. (2010). The pragmatic motifs of the Jespersen cycle. Default, activation and the history of negation in French. Lingua 120(9), 2240–2258.Google Scholar
  46. McClave, E., Kim, H., Tamer, R., & Mileff, M. (2007). Head movements in the context of speech in Arabic, Bulgarean, Korean, and African-American Vernacular English. Gesture, 7(3), 343–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McCleary, L., & Viotti, E. (2010). Sign-gesture symbiosis in Brazilian sign language narrative. In F. Parrill, V. Tobin & M. Turner (Eds.), Meaning, form, and body (pp. 181–201). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
  48. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McNeill, D., & Duncan, S. (2000). Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 141–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Mittelberg, I. (2008). Peircean semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in gestural representations of grammar. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 115–154). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  52. Morris, D. (1994). Bodytalk. A world guide to gestures. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  53. Morris, D., Collett, P., Marsh, P., & O’Shaghnessy, M. (1979). Gestures: Their origins and distribution. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  54. Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: A case of a gesture family? In R. Posner & C. Müller (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 233–256). Berlin: Weidler.Google Scholar
  55. Müller, C. (2008). What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 219–245). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  56. Müller, C., Bressem, J., & Ladewig, S. (2013). Towards a grammar of gestures: A form-based view. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), BodyLanguageCommunication (pp. 707–733). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  57. Müller, C., & Cienki, A. (2009). Words, gestures, and beyond: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 297–328). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  58. Müller, C., Ladewig, S., & Bressem, J. (2013). Gestures and speech from a linguistic perspective: A new field and its history. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), BodyLanguageCommunication (pp. 55–81). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  59. Neidle, C., Kegl, J., Maclaughlin, D., Bahan, B., & Lee, R.G. (2000). The syntax of American Sign Language. Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  60. Pfau, R. (2008). The grammar of headshake: A typological perspective on German Sign Language negation. Linguistics in Amsterdam, 1(1), 37–74.Google Scholar
  61. Pfau, R. (2016, this volume). A featural approach to sign language negation. In P. Larrivée & C. Lee (Eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives (pp. 45–74). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  62. Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
  63. Seyfeddinipur, M. (2006). Disfluency: Interupting speech and gesture. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  64. Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Studies in Linguistics Occassional Papers, 8.Google Scholar
  65. Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sweetser, E. (2007). Looking at space to study mental spaces. Co-speech gesture as a crucial data source in cognitive linguistics. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 201–224). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of English, University of Nottingham Ningbo ChinaNingboChina
  2. 2.Département des Sciences du Langage, CRISCO (EA4255)Université de Caen Basse-NormandieCaen CEDEX 5France

Personalised recommendations