Skip to main content

Quantitative Analysis of Focus Group Interviews

  • Conference paper
Global Perspectives in Marketing for the 21st Century

Abstract

The paper explores the appropriateness of using a neural network algorithm for ana-lyzing excerpts from focus group interviews. Keywords (brand names, values, etc.) are identified by the analyst. The program then scans the entire text and establishes a “cova-riance” matrix with weights that express pain/vise associations between words. This matrix can be used as input data set in multivariate analysis. The paper discusses a selection of problems involved in quantifying qualitative information. The empirical analysis is based on focus groups concerning a tourist catalogue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Grunert, Klaus and Margarete Bader. 1986. “A Systematic Way to Analyse Focus Group Data,” EMAC Proceedings. Helsinki, 825–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, James D. and Thomas W. White. 1994, “Participants Say the Damdest Things,” Paper presented at 2d. WW Electronic & Broadcast Audience Res. Symposium. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Thomas J. and Lyn Richards. 1991, “The NUD.IST Qualitative Data Analysis System”, Qualitative Sociology 14(4), 307–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Marcus. 1998. “Quantitative Analysis of Qualitative Interviews: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Analysis”, AMA Educator’s Proceedings, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmann, David. A. 1992. “Using Catpac to read Qualitative data,” Paper presented at the Advanced Research Techniques Forum of the AMA, Lake Tahoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, Eben A. and Matthew B. Miles. 1995. Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oakes, Cal.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woelfel, Joseph 1993. “Artificial Neural Networks in Policy Research: A Current Assessment,” Journal of Communication. 43(1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woelfel, Joseph and Nick Stoyanoff (undated), “CATPAC: A Neural Network for Qualitative Analysis of Text,” Working Paper. University of New York at Buffalo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zull, Cornelia, Robert P. Weber, and Philip P. Mohler (1989), The General Inquirer III. Mannheim Ger.: Zuma.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schmidt, M. (2015). Quantitative Analysis of Focus Group Interviews. In: Manrai, A., Meadow, H. (eds) Global Perspectives in Marketing for the 21st Century. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17356-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics