Skip to main content

Measuring Service Quality: To Tailor or not to Tailor?

  • Conference paper
Global Perspectives in Marketing for the 21st Century

Abstract

Service quality measurements are often made by academics and practitioners using a standardised measuring instrument. It is apparent that different industries display their own peculiar characteristics and some argue for the tailoring of measurement. This research investigates the relative importance to consumers of ‘standard’ quality measurements versus those tailored for particular service contexts. Results indicate that questions tailored to, or unique to, particular industries typically achieve higher ratings than standard questions indicating tailoring to be desirable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bagozzi, Richard P. 1994. Principles of Marketing Research: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H. and Tetreult, M. S. 1990. The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favourable and Unfavourable Incidents’, Journal of Marketing. 54 (1) Jan: 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Tom J. 1997. ‘Using norms to improve the interpretation of service quality measures’, The Journal of Service Marketing. 11(1): 66–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttle, Francis. 1996. ‘SERVQUAL: Review, Critique, Research Agenda’ in European Journal of Marketing. 30: 8–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crask, Melvin; Fox, Richard J. and Stout, Roy G. 1995. Marketing Research - Principles and Applications: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. J. and Taylor, S. A. 1992. ‘Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension’, Journal of Marketing. 56 (July): 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabholker, Pratibha A., Thorpe, Dayle I. and Rentz, Joseph O.1996. ‘A Measure of Service Quality for Retail Stores: Scale Development and Validation’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 24 (1): 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennew, Christine T., Reed, Geoffrey V. and Binks, Martin R. 1993. ‘Importance-Performance Analysis and the Measurement of Service Quality’, European Journal of Marketing. 27 (2): 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, R. L. and Blanchard, R. F. 1994. ‘Towards a Model of Service Quality - an Example in Retail Banking’, Occasional paper 15 (Feb.), Leicester Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, Nick and Tyas, Phil. 1996. ‘Use of Service Quality Gap Theory to Differentiate between Foodservice Outlets’, The Service Industries Journal. 16(3 July): 321–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Cathy and Mathews, Brian P. 1997. ‘The Influence Of Experience On Service Expectations’, International Journal of Service Industry Management. 8 (4): 290–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, David J.; Wales, Hugh G.; Taylor, Donald A. and Rubin, Ronald S. 1978. Marketing Research: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mersha, Tigineh and Adlakha, Veena. 1992. ‘Attributes of Service Quality: The Consumers’ Perspective’, International Journal of Service Industry Management. 3 (3): 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, Valarie A. and Berry, Leonard L. 1985. ‘A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research’, Journal of Marketing. 49 (Fall): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, Valarie A. and Berry, Leonard L. 1988. SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measureing Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality, Journal of Retailing. 64 (Spring): 12–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. Parasuraman, A. and Berry, L. 1990. Delivering Quality Service: The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, Valarie A. and Bitner, Mary Jo. 1996. Service Marketing: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Santos, J., Mathews, B.P. (2015). Measuring Service Quality: To Tailor or not to Tailor?. In: Manrai, A., Meadow, H. (eds) Global Perspectives in Marketing for the 21st Century. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17356-6_59

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics